Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T16:13:42.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE EFFECTS OF ALUMINIUM ON THE PHOTOSYNTHETIC APPARATUS OF TWO RICE CULTIVARS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2013

E. M. FONSECA JÚNIOR ,
J. CAMBRAIA ,
C. RIBEIRO ,
M. A. OLIVA ,
J. A. OLIVEIRA  and
F. M. DaMATTA
E. M. FONSECA JÚNIOR
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil
J. CAMBRAIA*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil
C. RIBEIRO
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil
M. A. OLIVA
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil
J. A. OLIVEIRA
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil
F. M. DaMATTA
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil
*
‡Corresponding author. Email: cambraia@ufv.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

We aimed to evaluate aluminium (Al) effects on the photosynthetic apparatus of two rice cultivars with contrasting tolerances to Al. Nine-days-old seedlings were exposed to 0 or 1 mM Al for 10 days, and then dry mass, Al and chloroplastidic pigment contents and photosynthetic parameters were determined. Al accumulated mainly in the roots of the Al-treated plants. In the leaves, Al increased only in the sensitive cultivar, but there was no difference between the cultivars in Al-treated plants. The root and leaf dry mass, the net carbon assimilation rate, stomatal conductance and internal CO2 concentration were all reduced in response to Al application, but only in the sensitive cultivar. Both the initial fluorescence and potential photochemical efficiency of photosystem II were unresponsive to the Al treatments, regardless of the cultivar. In the Al-sensitive cultivar, Al provoked significant decreases in the photochemical quenching coefficient, quantum yield of photosystem II electron transport and apparent electron transport rate, in parallel to an unaltered non-photochemical quenching coefficient. All of these parameters remained at the control levels in the tolerant cultivar. The chloroplastidic pigment content increased only in the Al-tolerant cultivar, whereas it remained unaltered after Al treatment in the sensitive cultivar. In conclusion, Al induced stomatal and (most likely) photochemical constraints on photosynthesis but with no apparent signs of photoinhibition in the Al-sensitive cultivar. Despite the similar Al levels of the cultivars, unchanging biomass accumulation or photosynthetic performance in the tolerant cultivar challenged with Al highlights its higher intrinsic ability to cope with Al stress.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , July 2014 , pp. 343 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akaya, M. and Takenaka, C. (2001). Effects of aluminum stress on photosynthesis of Quercus glauca Thumb. Plant and Soil 237:137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L.-S., Qi, Y.-P., Jiang, H.-X. and Yang, G.-H. (2010). Photosynthesis and photoprotective systems of plants in response to aluminum toxicity. African Journal of Biotechnology 9:9237–9247.Google Scholar
Chen, L.-S., Qi, Y.-P., Smith, B. R. and Liu, X.-H. (2005). Aluminum-induced decrease in CO2 assimilation in citrus seedlings is unaccompanied by decreased activities of key enzymes involved in CO2 assimilation. Tree Physiology 25:317–324.Google Scholar
Clark, R. B. (1975). Characterization of phosphatase of intact maize roots. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 23:458–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruz, J. L., Mosquim, P. R., Pelacani, C. R., Araújo, W. L. and DaMatta, F. M. (2003). Photosynthesis impairment in cassava leaves in response to nitrogen deficiency. Plant and Soil 257:417–243.Google Scholar
Famoso, A. N., Clark, R. T., Shaff, J. E., Craft, E., McCouch, S. R. and Kochian, L. V. (2010). Development of a novel aluminum tolerance phenotyping platform used for comparisons of cereal. Plant Physiology 153:1678–1691.Google Scholar
Foy, C. D. (1988). Plant adaptation to acid, aluminum-toxic soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 19:959–987.Google Scholar
Giannakoula, A., Moustakas, M., Mylona, P., Papadakis, I. and Upsanis, T. (2008). Aluminum tolerance in maize is correlated with increased levels of mineral nutrients, carbohydrates and proline, and decreased levels of lipid peroxidation and Al accumulation. Journal of Plant Physiology 165:385–396.Google Scholar
Jiang, H.-X., Chen, L.-S., Zheng, J.-G., Han, S., Tang, N. and Smith, B. R. (2008). Aluminum-induced effects on photosystem II photochemistry in Citrus leaves assessed by the chlorophyll a fluorescence transient. Tree Physiology 28:1863–1871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Justino, G. C., Cambraia, J., Oliva, M. A. and Oliveira, J. A. (2006). Efeito do alumínio sobre a absorção e redução de nitrato em dois cultivares de arroz. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 41:1285–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochian, L. V., Hoekenga, O. A. and Piñeros, M. A. (2004). How do crop plants tolerate acid soils? Mechanisms of aluminum tolerance and phosphorous efficiency. Annual Review of Plant Biology 55:459–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krause, G. H. and Weis, E. (1991). Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 42:313–349.Google Scholar
Lichtenthaler, H. K. (1987). Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods in Enzymology 148:350–382.Google Scholar
Lima, A. L. S., DaMatta, F. M., Pinheiro, H. A., Tótola, M. R. and Loureiro, M. E. (2002). Photochemical responses and oxidative stress in two clones of Coffea canephora under water deficit conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany 47:239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendonça, R. J., Cambraia, J., Oliveira, J. A. and Oliva, M. A. (2003). Efeito do alumínio na absorção e na utilização de macronutrientes em duas cultivares de arroz. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 38:843–848.Google Scholar
Mendonça, R. J., Cambraia, J., Oliva, M. A. and Oliveira, J. A. (2005). Capacidade de cultivares de arroz de modificar o pH de soluções nutritivas na presença de alumínio. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 40:447–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, S., Mumm, P., Impes, D., Endler, A., Weder, B., Al-Rasheid, K. A. S., Geiger, D., Marten, I., Martinoia, E. and Hedrich, R. (2010). AtALMT12 represents an R-type anion channel required for stomatal movement in Arabidopsis guard cells. Plant Journal 63:1054–1062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mihailovic, N., Drazic, G. and Vucinic, Z. (2008). Effects of aluminum on photosynthetic performance in Al-sensitive and Al-tolerant maize inbred lines. Photosynthetica 46:476–480.Google Scholar
Milivojevic, D. and Stojanovic, D. (2003). Role of calcium in aluminum toxicity on content of pigments and pigment-protein complexes of soybean. Journal of Plant Nutrition 26:341–350.Google Scholar
Moustakas, M., Eleftheriou, E. P. and Ouzounidou, G. (1997). Short-term effects of aluminum at alkaline pH on the structure and function of the photosynthetic apparatus. Photosynthetica 34:169–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxborough, K. and Baker, N. R. (1997). Resolving chlorophyll a fluorescence images of photosynthetic efficiency into photochemical and non-photochemical components – calculation of qP and Fv′/Fm′ without measuring F 0′. Photosynthesis Research 54:135–142.Google Scholar
Peixoto, P. H. P., DaMatta, F. M. and Cambraia, J. (2002). Responses of the photosynthetic apparatus to aluminum stress in two sorghum cultivars. Journal of Plant Nutrition 25:821–832.Google Scholar
Ryan, P. R. and Delhaize, E. (2010). The convergent evolution of aluminium resistance in plants exploits a convenient currency. Functional Plant Biology 37:275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, S., Pinto, G., Dias, M. C., Correia, C. M., Moutinho-Pereira, J., Pinto-Carnide, O. and Santos, C. (2012). Aluminium long-term stress differently affects photosynthesis in rye genotypes. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 54:105–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, S., Pinto-Carnide, O., Martins-Lopes, P., Matos, M., Guedes-Pinto, H. and Santos, C. (2010). Differential aluminium changes on nutrient accumulation and root differentiation in a sensitive vs. tolerant wheat. Environmental and Experimental Botany 68:91–98.Google Scholar
Wang, C. and Wood, F. A. (1973). A modified aluminum reagent for the determination of aluminum after HNO3-H2SO4 digestion. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 53:237–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar