Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:16:56.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EFFECT OF ORGANIC FERTILIZERS ON NITRATE ACCUMULATION IN VEGETABLES AND MINERAL NITROGEN IN TROPICAL SOILS OF MOROGORO, TANZANIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2011

MARCELINA A BAITILWAKE*
Affiliation:
Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O.Box 3203, Morogoro, Tanzania Ghent University, Department of Soil Management, Coupure 653, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
SARA DE BOLLE
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Department of Soil Management, Coupure 653, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
JOOST SALOMEZ
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Department of Soil Management, Coupure 653, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
JEROME P MREMA
Affiliation:
Sokoine University of Agriculture, Department of Soil Science, P.O.Box 3008, Morogoro, Tanzania
STEFAAN DE NEVE
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Department of Soil Management, Coupure 653, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
*
§Corresponding author: E-mail: mbalu96@yahoo.com

Summary

Nitrogen (N) nutrition is a key factor for vegetable growth and yield. However, different rates of nitrogen fertilization may trigger different responses to vegetables. A survey was conducted to investigate the effect of soil fertility management practices on nitrate concentration in vegetables. The survey results were used to plan experiments on the effect of chicken and cattle manures on nitrate levels in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa) and amaranthus (Amaranthus cruentus) grown in Tanzania and the patterns of mineral nitrogen in soils under open field conditions. Chicken or cattle manure at 200, 300 kg N ha−1 and 170 250 kg N ha−1 for Chinese cabbage and amaranthus respectively, and control were compared in a randomized complete block design. We observed a higher nitrate content in fertilized Chinese cabbage at day 30 than at day 44 after sowing, ranging from 3243 to 4993 mg kg−1 fresh matter regardless of the N source and rates. Only application of manures at high levels (250 kg N ha−1) induced significantly (p < 0.05) higher nitrate contents in amaranthus at day 28 after sowing, although there was a clear indication of nitrate accumulation even at 170 kg N ha−1 application. Soil NH4+-N + NO3-N in both Chinese cabbage and amaranthus plots were increased with increasing N application rates and differences between control and amended soils were significant (p < 0.01). There was a positive relationship between NO3 concentration in vegetables and NO3-N in the rooted top soil layer (0–15 cm). However, higher NH4+ concentrations depressed NO3 build up in crops and a significant negative relationship between soil (NH4+-N)/(NO3-N) ratio and crop NO3 content was found. It is concluded that low manure application rates result in similar yields to high rates but reduces nitrate accumulation in vegetables and excess mineral nitrogen in soils.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abou El-Magd, M. M., El-Bassiony, A. M. and Fawzy, Z. F. (2006). Effect of organic manure with or without chemical fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of some varieties of broccoli plants. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 2:791798.Google Scholar
Amr, A. and Hadidi, N. (2001). Effect of cultivar and harvesting date on nitrate (NO3) and nitrite (NO2) content of selected vegetables grown under open field and greenhouse conditions in Jordan. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 14:5967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baitilwake, M. A., De Bolle, S., Salomez, J., Mrema, J. P. and De Neve, S. (2010). Nitrogen mineralization of two manures as influenced by contrasting application methods under laboratory conditions. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. In press.Google Scholar
Bremner, J. M. and Keeney, D. R. (1965). Steam distillation methods for determination of ammonium, nitrate and nitrite. Analytical Chemistry Acta 32:485495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J. M. and Mulvaney, C. S. (1982). Nitrogen total. In. Methods of Soil Analysis. Agronomy Monograph 9, Part 2, 2nd ed., 595624 (Eds Page, A. L., Miller, R. H., and Keeney, D. R.). Madison. USA: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World Development. 22:12531268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission of the European Communities Scientific Committee for Food (1994/97). Report of the Scientific Committee for Food on Nitrate and Nitrite, 26th Series, EC, Brussels.Google Scholar
De Neve, S., Csitári, G., Salomez, J. and Hofman, G. (2004). Quantification of the effect of fumigation on short and long term nitrogen mineralization and nitrification in different soils. Journal of Environment Quality 33:16471652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, J. (2008). Effects of different harvest start times on leafy vegetables (lettuce, pak choi and rocket) in a reaping and regrowth system. Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Agriculture Science at Lincoln University, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Gee, G. W. and Bauder, J. W. (1978). Particle size analysis. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 1, 383412 (Ed. Klute, A.). Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Hill, M. J. (1999). Nitrate toxicity: myth or reality. British Journal of Nutrition 81: 343344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kucke, M. and Kleeberg, P. (1997). Nitrogen balance and soil nitrogen dynamics in two areas with different soil, climatic and cropping conditions. European Journal of Agronomy 6:89100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maerere, A. P., Kimbi, G. G. and Nonga, D. L. M. (2001). Comparative effectiveness of manures on soil chemical properties, yield and root growth of amaranthus. African Journal of Science and Technology 1:1421.Google Scholar
McLean, E. O. (1982). Soil pH and lime requirements. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Agronomy Monograph 9, Part 2, 2nd ed., 199223 (Eds Page, A. L.). Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S. and Dean, L. A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Circular 993 US Dep. of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Priha, O., Lehto, T. and Smolander, A. (1999). Mycorrhizas and C and N transformations in the rhizosphere of Pinus sylvestris, Pices abies and Betula pendula seedlings. Plant and Soil 206:191204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santamaria, P. (2006). Nitrate in vegetables: Toxicity, content, intake and EC regulation. Science of Food and Agriculture 10:1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sleutel, S., De Neve, S., Prat Roibás, M. R. and Hofman, G. (2005). The influence of model type and incubation time on the estimation of stable organic carbon. European Journal of Soil Science 56:505514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speijers, G. J. A. (1996). Nitrite (and potential endogenous formation of N-nitroso compounds). In Toxicological Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants in Food, 269–323. World Health Organization, Food Additives Series 35.Google Scholar
Takebe, M., Ishihara, T., Ishii, K. and Yoneyama, T. (1995). Effect of nitrogen forms and Ca/K ratio in the culture solution on the contents of nitrate, ascorbic acid and oxalic acid in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L) and komatsuna (Brassica campestris L.). Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 66:535543.Google Scholar
Walkley, A. and Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soils organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 63:251263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, S. A., Corey, R. B. and Iyer, J. G. (1979). Soil and Plant Analysis for Tree Culture, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. New Delhi.Google Scholar
WRB (World reference base for soil resources). (2006). A framework for international classification, correlation and communication. World Soil Resource Reports 103.Google Scholar