Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T08:18:18.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DETERMINANTS OF FERTILIZER MICRODOSING-INDUCED YIELD INCREMENT OF PEARL MILLET ON AN ACID SANDY SOIL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2015

ALI IBRAHIM ,
ROBERT CLEMENT ABAIDOO ,
DOUGBEDJI FATONDJI  and
ANDREWS OPOKU
ALI IBRAHIM*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah Univeristy of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, BP: 12404 Niamey, Niger
ROBERT CLEMENT ABAIDOO
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah Univeristy of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria
DOUGBEDJI FATONDJI
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, BP: 12404 Niamey, Niger
ANDREWS OPOKU
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah Univeristy of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
*
§Corresponding author. Email: ibramali@myway.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Recent studies have reported the benefits of fertilizer microdosing in increasing crop yields in low input cropping systems. Little information is however available on the mechanisms underlying this effect. The objective of this study was therefore to explore the root-based mechanisms governing the growth enhancing phenomena of the fertilizer microdosing technology. A two-year experiment was conducted at the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Research Station in Niger. Four treatments comprising (i) 2 g hill−1 of diammonuim phosphate (DAP), (ii) 6 g hill−1 of compound fertilizer NPK, (iii) broadcasting of 200 kg ha−1 of compound fertilizer NPK (recommended rate) and (iv) unfertilized control was arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. On average, fertilizer microdosing treatments (2-g DAP hill−1 and 6-g NPK hill−1) achieved 86% and 79% of the grain yields recorded from broadcasting of 200-kg NPK ha−1, respectively, in 2013 and 2014. The leaf area index and leaf chlorophyll content significantly increased with fertilizer microdosing at the early stage of millet growth. At the same stage, fertilizer microdosing enhanced the lateral root length density in the topsoil (0–20 cm) by 72% and 40% at respective lateral distances of 25 cm and 50 cm from the centre of the hill compared with broadcast of 200-kg NPK ha−1. Fertilizer microdosing did not significantly change soil pH in the root zone. It is concluded that the positive effect of fertilizer microdosing in increasing millet yield results from the better exploitation of soil nutrients due to early lateral roots proliferation within the topsoil.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , October 2016 , pp. 562 - 578
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akponikpé, P. B. I., Michels, K. and Bielders, C. L. (2008). Integrated nutrient management of pearl millet in the Sahel combining cattle manure, crop residues and mineral fertilizer. Experimental Agriculture 44:453–472.Google Scholar
Aune, J. B. and Bationo, A. (2008). Agricultural intensification in the Sahel – the ladder approach. Agricultural Systems 98:119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagayoko, M., Alvey, S., Neumann, G. and Buerkert, A. (2000). Root-induced increases in soil pH and nutrient availability to field-grown cereals and legumes on acid sandy soils of Sudano-Sahelian West Africa. Plant and Soil 225:117–127.Google Scholar
Bationo, A., Christianson, C., Baethgen, W. and Mokwunye, A. (1992). A farm-level evaluation of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer use and planting density for pearl millet production in Niger. Fertilizer Research 31:175–184.Google Scholar
Bationo, A. and Mokwunye, A. (1991). Alleviating soil fertility constraints to increase crop production in West Africa: the experience in the Sahel. In Alleviating Soil Fertility Constraints to Increased Crop Production in West Africa, 195–215 (Ed. A. U. Mokwunye). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Bationo, A. and Waswa, B. (2011). New challenges and opportunities for integrated soil fertility management in Africa. In Innovations as Key to the Green Revolution in Africa, 3–17 (Eds Bationo, A., Waswa, B., Okeyo, J. M., Maina, F. and Kihara, J.). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Bielders, C. L. and Gérard, B. (2014). Millet response to microdose fertilization in South–Western Niger: effect of antecedent fertility management and environmental factors. Field Crops Research 171:165–175.Google Scholar
Black, A., Sherlock, R., Smith, N., Cameron, K. and Goh, K. (1985). Effects of form of nitrogen, season, and urea application rate on ammonia volatilisation from pastures. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 28:469–474.Google Scholar
Brück, H., Sattelmacher, B. and Payne, W. (2003). Varietal differences in shoot and rooting parameters of pearl millet on sandy soils in Niger. Plant and Soil 251:175–185.Google Scholar
Buerkert, A., Bationo, A. and Piepho, H.-P. (2001). Efficient of phosphorus application strategies for increased crop production in sub-Saharan West Africa. Field Crops Research 72:1–15.Google Scholar
Fan, M. X. and Mackenzie, A. F. (1993). Urea and phosphate interactions in fertilizer microsites: ammonia volatilization and pH changes. Soil Science Society of America Journal 57:839–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gérard, B., Hiernaux, P., Muehlig-Versen, B. and Buerkert, A. (2001). Destructive and non-destructive measurements of residual crop residue and phosphorus effects on growth and composition of herbaceous fallow species in the Sahel. Plant and Soil 228:265–273.Google Scholar
Hafner, H., George, E., Bationo, A. and Marschner, H. (1993). Effect of crop residues on root growth and phosphorus acquisition of pearl millet in an acid sandy soil in Niger. Plant and Soil 150:117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, J. L. (2011). Soil management for increasing water use efficiency in field crops under changing climates. In Soil Management: Building a Stable Base for Agriculture, 161–173 (Eds Hatfield, J. L. and Sauer, T. J.). Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Hayashi, K., Abdoulaye, T., Gerard, B. and Bationo, A. (2008). Evaluation of application timing in fertilizer micro-dosing technology on millet production in Niger, West Africa. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 80:257–265.Google Scholar
Hinsinger, P., Plassard, C., Tang, C. and Jaillard, B. (2003). Origins of root-mediated pH changes in the rhizosphere and their responses to environmental constraints: a review. Plant and Soil 248:43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, A. (2004). The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients. New phytologist 162:9–24.Google Scholar
Houba, V., Van der Lee, J. and Novozamsky, I. (1995). Soil Analysis Procedures; Other Procedures (Soil and Plant Analysis, Part 5B). Tech. Report, Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, Netherlands, 217 p.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, A., Abaidooa, R. C., Fatondji, D. and Opoku, A. (2015). Hill placement of manure and fertilizer micro-dosing improves yieldand water use efficiency in the Sahelian low input millet-basedcropping system. Field Crops Research 180:29–36.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, A., Pasternak, D. and Fatondji, D. (2014). Impact of depth of placement of mineral fertilizer micro-dosing on growth, yield and partial nutrient balance in pearl millet cropping system in the Sahel. Journal of Agricultural Science 153:1412–1421.Google Scholar
ICRISAT. (2009). Fertilizer microdosing-boosting production in unproductive lands. Available at: http://www.icrisat.org/impact-stories/icrisat-is-fertilizer-microdosing (accessed 14 February 2014).Google Scholar
Jing, J., Rui, Y., Zhang, F., Rengel, Z. and Shen, J. (2010). Localized application of phosphorus and ammonium improves growth of maize seedlings by stimulating root proliferation and rhizosphere acidification. Field Crops Research 119:355–364.Google Scholar
Khasawneh, F., Sample, E. and Kamprath, E. (1980). Agronomic effectiveness of phosphate fertilizers. In The Role of Phosphorus in Agriculture, 311–332 (Eds Khasawneh, F. E., Sample, E. C. and Kamprath, E. J.). Madison, WI: ASA.Google Scholar
Klaij, M. and Vachaud, G. (1992). Seasonal water balance of a sandy soil in Niger cropped with pearl millet, based on profile moisture measurements. Agricultural Water Management 21:313–330.Google Scholar
Ma, Q., Zhang, F., Rengel, Z. and Shen, J. (2013). Localized application of NH4+–N plus P at the seedling and later growth stages enhances nutrient uptake and maize yield by inducing lateral root proliferation. Plant and Soil 372:65–80.Google Scholar
Manu, A., Bationo, A. and Geiger, S. (1991). Fertility status of selected millet producing soils of West Africa with emphasis on phosphorus. Soil Science 152:315–320.Google Scholar
Marschner, H. (1991). Mechanisms of adaptation of plants to acid soils. In Plant-Soil Interactions at Low pH, Vol. 45, 683–702 (Eds Wright, R. J., Baligar, V. C. and Murrmann, R. P.). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Muehlig-Versen, B., Buerkert, A., Bationo, A. and Roeheld, V. (2003). Phosphorus placement on acid arenosol of the west African Sahel. Experimental Agriculture 39:307–325.Google Scholar
Payne, W. A. (1997). Managing yield and water use of pearl millet in the Sahel. Agronomy Journal 89:481–490.Google Scholar
Rebafka, F.-P., Bationo, A. and Marschner, H. (1993). Phosphorus seed coating increases phosphorus uptake, early growth and yield of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) grown on an acid sandy soil in Niger, West Africa. Fertilizer Research 35:151–160.Google Scholar
Rengel, Z., Tang, C., Raphael, C. and Bowden, J. W. (2000). Understanding subsoil acidification: effect of nitrogen transformation and nitrate leaching. Soil Research 38:837–849.Google Scholar
Russo, P., Pettit, C., Coltekin, A., Imhof, M., Cox, M. and Bayliss, C. (2014). Understanding soil acidification process using animation and text: an empirical user evaluation with eye tracking. In Cartography from Pole to Pole, 431–448 (Eds M. Buchroithner, N. Prechtel and D. Burghardt). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Sivakumar, M. V. K. and Salaam, S. A. (1999). Effect of year and fertilizer on water-use efficiency of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) in Niger. The Journal of Agricultural Science 132:139–148.Google Scholar
Smit, A. L., Blom-Zandstra, M., van der Werf, A. and Bindraban, P. S. (2013). Enhancing Early Root Growth to Exploit Indigenous Soil P and Fertilizer P. VFRC Report 2013/4, Virtual Fertilizer Research Center, Washington, DC, 36 p.Google Scholar
Tabo, R., Bationo, A., Amadou, B., Marchal, D., Lompo, F., Gandah, M., Hassane, O., Diallo, M. K., Ndjeunga, J., Fatondji, D., Gerard, B., Sogodogo, D., Taonda, J. B. S., Sako, K., Boubacar, S., Abdou, A. and Koala, S. (2011). Fertilizer microdosing and ‘warrantage’ or inventory credit system to improve food security and farmers’ income in West Africa. In Innovations as Key to the Green Revolution in Africa, 113–121 (Eds Bationo, A., Waswa, B., Okeyo, J. M., Maina, F. and Kihara, J. M.). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Tabo, R., Bationo, A., Gerard, B., Ndjeunga, J., Marchal, D., Amadou, B., Annou, M. G., Sogodogo, D., Taonda, J.-B. S. and Hassane, O. (2007). Improving cereal productivity and farmers’ income using a strategic application of fertilizers in West Africa. In Advances in Integrated Soil Fertility Management in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities, 201–208 (Eds Bationo, A., Waswa, B., Kihara, J. and Kimetu, J.). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Tennant, D. (1975). A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. Journal of Ecology 63:995–1001.Google Scholar
Trust, L. A. (2007). Genstat. Rothamsted, UK: Lawes Agricultural Trust (Rothamsted Experimental Station).Google Scholar
Twomlow, S., Rohrbach, D., Dimes, J., Rusike, J., Mupangwa, W., Ncube, B., Hove, L., Moyo, M., Mashingaidze, N. and Mahposa, P. (2010). Micro-dosing as a pathway to Africa's green revolution: evidence from broad-scale on-farm trials. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 88:3–15.Google Scholar
Vadez, V., Krishnamurthy, L., Kashiwagi, J., Kholova, J., Devi, J., Sharma, K., Bhatnagar-Mathur, P., Hoisington, D., Hash, C. and Bidinger, F. (2007). Exploiting the functionality of root systems for dry, saline, and nutrient deficient environments in a changing climate. Journal of SAT Agricultural Research 4:1–61.Google Scholar
van Reeuwijk, L. P. (1993). Procedures for Soil Analysis. Technical paper No. 9, 4th edn (Ed International Soil Reference and Information Center). Dordrecht, Netherlands: ISRIC.Google Scholar
Viets, F. G. (1962). Fertilizers and the efficient use of water. Advances in Agronomy 14:223–264.Google Scholar
Weligama, C., Tang, C., Sale, P., Conyers, M. and Liu, D. (2008). Localised nitrate and phosphate application enhances root proliferation by wheat and maximises rhizosphere alkalisation in acid subsoil. Plant and Soil 312:101–115.Google Scholar
West, L. T., Wilding, L. P., Landeck, J. K. and Calhoun, F. G. (1984). Soil Survey of the ICRISAT Sahelian Center, Niger, West Africa. Texas A&M University System/Tropsoils in cooperation with the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Yamoah, C. F., Bationo, A., Shapiro, B. and Koala, S. (2002). Trend and stability analyses of millet yields treated with fertilizer and crop residues in the Sahel. Field Crops Research 75:53–62.Google Scholar