Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:29:35.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characteristics of High Yielding Cassava Varieties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

James H. Cock
James H. Cock
Affiliation:
Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical Apartado aéreo 6713, Cali-Colombia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Forty different cultivars of cassava were grown in unreplicated plots at a plant population of 20,000 plants/ha in fertile soil. Harvests were taken at 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 months after planting 18 varieties. The characteristics of the two highest yielding varieties, M Colombia 113 (66 t/ha) and M Colombia 22 (32 t/ha), were compared with the other types. M Colombia 22 is an early type (25 t/ha after 6 months) with a very high harvest index; M Colombia 113 yields little better than average 6 months after planting. High yield is associated with a balance between leaf production and root production, so that leaf area index does not decline excessively in the later growth stages. Changing canopy structure is unlikely to increase yields.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , April 1976 , pp. 135 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

CIAT (1972). A. Rep. Centro Int. Agric. Trop. Cali, Colombia.Google Scholar
Cock, J. H. (1973). 3rd. Symp. Int. Trop. Root Crop Soc., Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Doku, E. V. (1965). Ghana J. Science 5, 42.Google Scholar
Duncan, W. G., Loomis, R. S., Williams, W. A. & Hanau, R. (1967). Hilgardia 38, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enyi, B. A. C. (1972). J. Hort. Sci. 47, 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomis, R. S., Williams, W. A. & Hall, A. E. (1971). A. Rev. Plant. Physiol. 22, 431.Google Scholar
Sinha, S. E. & Nair, T. V. R. (1971). Ind. J. Genetics Pl. Breeding 31, 16.Google Scholar
Vries, C. A.de Ferweda, J. D. & Flach, M. (1967). Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 15, 241.Google Scholar
Watson, D. J. & Watson, M. A. (1953). Ann. Appl. Biol. 40, 1.Google Scholar
Williams, C. N. & Ghazali, S. M. (1969). Expl Agric. 5, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, S., Forno, D. A., Cock, J. H. & Gomez, K. A. (1972). Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice (2nd ed.). Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar