Skip to main content Accessibility help




Understanding the growth dynamics of fine roots and their contribution to soil organic carbon and nutrient pools is crucial for estimating ecosystem carbon and nutrient cycling and how these are influenced by climate change. Rubber is cultivated in more than 10 million hectare globally and the area under rubber cultivation is fast expanding due to socio-economic reasons, apart from the importance given to this species for eco-restoration of degraded lands. An experiment was conducted to quantify fine root production, fine root turnover and carbon and nutrient cycling through fine roots in rubber plantations with different soil nutrient status and rainfall pattern. Fine root production was estimated by sequential coring and ingrowth core methods. Fine root decomposition was determined by the litter bag technique. Carbon and nutrient contents in fine roots were determined and their turnover was computed. Fine root biomass in the top 0–7.5-cm soil layer showed significant seasonal fluctuation and the fluctuations were particularly wide during the transition period from the dry season to the rainy season. Fine root production estimated by the different methods was significantly higher at the lower fertility site and during the higher soil moisture stress year. Fine root turnover ranged from 1.04 to 2.29 year−1. Root carbon and nutrient status showed seasonal variation and lower status was observed during the rainy season. The annual recycling of C, N, P, K, Ca and Mg through fine roots ranged from 590 to 1758, 30 to 85, 3 to 12, 13 to 31, 11 to 35 and 6 to 13 kg ha−1, respectively. Substantial quantities of carbon and nutrients were recycled annually in rubber plantations through fine roots. When soil moisture and nutrient stress were more severe, fine root production, turnover and carbon and nutrient recycling through fine roots were higher.


Corresponding author

Corresponding author. Email:


Hide All
Agren, G., Axelsson, B., Flower-Ellis, J. G. K., Linder, T., Person, H., Staaf, H. and Troeng, E. (1980). Annual carbon budget for a young Scots pine. Ecological Bulletin 32:307313.
Bouillet, J. P., Laclau, J. P. and Arnaud, M. (2002). Changes with age in the spatial distribution of roots of Eucalyptus clone in Congo: impact on water and nutrient uptake. Forest Ecology and Management 171:4357.
Braekke, F. H. (1995). Responses of under storey vegetation and Scots pine root systems to fertilization at multiple deficiency stress. Plant and Soil 168–169:179185.
Bray, R. H. and Kurtz, L. T. (1945). Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science 59:3945.
Cheng, X. and Bledsoe, C. S. (2002). Contrasting seasonal patterns of fine root production for blue oaks Quercus douglassi and annual grasses in California oak woodland. Plant and Soil 240:263274.
Edwards, N. T. and Harris, W. F. (1977). Carbon cycling in a mixed deciduous forest floor. Ecology 58:431437.
Fahey, T. J. and Hughes, J. W. (1994). Fine root dynamics in a northern hard wood forest ecosystem. Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest. Journal of Ecology 82:533548.
Fahey, T. J., Hughes, J. W., Pu, M. and Arthur, M. A. (1988). Root decomposition in nutrient flux following whole tree harvest of northern hard wood forest. Forest Science 34:744768.
Fairley, R. I. and Alexander, I. J. (1985). Methods of calculation fine root production in forests In Ecological Interactions in Soil, Plants, Microbes and Animals, 3742 (Eds Fitter, A. H., Alkinson, D. and Read, D. J.). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Forde, B. and Lorenzo, H. (2001). The nutritional control of root development. Plant and Soil 232:5168.
George, E., Seith, B., Schaeffer, C. and Marschner, H. (1997). Responses of Picea, Pinus and Pseudotsuga roots to heterogeneous nutrient distribution in soil. Tree Physiology 17:3945.
George, S., Suresh, P. R., Wahid, P. A., Nair, R. B. and Punnoose, K. I. (2009). Active root distribution pattern of Hevea brasiliensis determined by radioassay of latex serum. Agroforestry Systems 76:275281.
Green, J. J., Dawson, L. A., Proctor, J., Duff, E. I. and Elston, D. A. (2005). Fine root dynamics in a tropical rain forest is influenced by rainfall. Plant and Soil 276:2332.
Hertel, D. and Leuschner, C. (2002). A comparison of four different fine root production estimates with ecosystem carbon balance data in a Fagus–Quercus mixed forest. Plant and Soil 239:237251.
Jackson, M. L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis, 498 pp. New York: Prentice Hall Inc.
Jackson, R. B., Mooney, H. A. and Schulze, E. D. (1997). A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area and nutrient contents. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA 94:73627366.
Jessy, M. D. (2004). Phosphorus Nutrioperiodism in Rubber. PhD thesis, Kerala Agricultural University.
Jessy, M. D., Meera Bai, M., Nair, A. N. S. and Meti, S. (2007). Adaptability to low soil phosphorus in rubber trees: role of roots and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Journal of Plantation Crops 35:133138.
Jessy, M. D., Meera Bai, M., Rajendran, P., Geethakumari, L., Nair, A. N. S. and Philip, S. (2008). Adaptability of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) trees to low soil phosphorus. Some mechanisms involved. Journal of Plantation Crops 30:1218.
Jessy, M. D., Prasannakumari, P., Nair, R. B., Vijayakumar, K. R. and Nair, N. U. (2010). Influence of soil moisture and nutrient status on fine root dynamics of rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis). Journal of Plantation Crops 38:9296.
Jessy, M. D., Thomas, V. and Vijayakumar, K. R. (2005). Fine root production of rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) in relation to precipitation. Preprints of papers, International Natural Rubber Conference, India, 156–163.
Jha, P. and Mohapatra, K. P. (2010). Leaf litterfall, fine root production and turnover in four major tree species of the semi-arid region of India. Plant and Soil 326:481491.
Jourdan, C., Silva, E. V., Goncalves, J. L. M., Ranger, J., Moreira, R. M. and Laclau, J. P. (2008). Fine root production and turnover in Brazilean Eucalyptus plantations under contrasting nitrogen fertilizer regimes. Forest Ecology and Management 256:396404.
Joslin, J. D. and Wolfe, M. H. (1998) Impacts of water input manipulations on fine root production and mortality in a mature hardwood forest. Plant and Soil 204:165174.
Keyes, M. R. and Grier, C. C. (1981). Above and below ground production in 40 year old Douglas fir stands on low and high productivity sites. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 11:599605.
Krishnakumar, A. K., Gupta, C., Sinha, R. R., Sethuraj, M. R., Potty, S. N., Eappen, T. and Das, K. (1991). Ecological impact of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantations in North East India: 2. Soil properties and biomass recycling. Indian Journal of Rubber Research 4 (2):134141.
Leuschner, C. and Hertel, D. (2002). Fine root biomass of temperate forests in relation to soil acidity and fertility, climate, age and species. Progress in Botany 64:405438.
Leuschner, C., Hertel, D., Schmid, I., Koch, O., Muhs, A. and Holscher, D. (2004). Stand fine root morphology in old-growth beech forests as a function of precipitation and soil fertility. Plant and Soil 258:4356.
Levillain, J., M'Bou, A. T., Deleporte, P., Saint-Andre, D. and Jourdan, C. (2011). Is the simple auger coring method reliable for below-ground standing biomass estimation in Eucalyptus forest plantations? Annals of Botany 108:221230.
Lopez, B., Sabate, S. and Garcia, C. A. (2001). Annual and seasonal changes in the fine root biomass of a Quercus ilex L forest. Plant and Soil 230:125134.
Majdi, H., Pregitzer, K., Morien, A., Nylund, J. and Agren, G. J. (2005). Measuring fine root turn over in forest ecosystems. Plant and Soil 276:18.
McClaugherty, C., Aber, J. D. and Melillo, J. M. (1982). The role of fine roots in the organic matter and nitrogen budgets of two forested ecosystems. Ecology 63:1481.
McGroddy, M. and Silver, W. L. (2000). Variations in belowground carbon storage and soil CO2 flux rates along a wet tropical climate gradient. Biotropica 32:614622
Morgan, M. F. (1941). Chemical Diagnosis by the Universal Soil Testing System, 450. Bulletin of the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station.
Persson, H. A. and Stadenberg, I. (2010). Fine root dynamics in a Norway spruce forest (Picea abies (L.) Karst) in eastern Sweden. Plant and Soil 330:329344.
Post, W. M., Emmanuel, W. R., Zinke, P. J. and Stangenberger, A. G. (1982). Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature 298:156159.
Rasse, D. P., Rumpel, C. and Dignac, M. F. (2005). Is soil carbon mostly root carbon? Mechanisms for a specific stabilization. Plant and Soil 269:341356.
Soong, N. K. (1976). Feeder root development of Hevea brasiliensis in relation to clones and environment. Journal of the Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia 24:283298.
Steingrobe, B., Scmid, H. and Classen, N. (2001). Root production and root mortality of winter barley and its implication with regard to phosphate acquisition. Plant and Soil 237:239248.
Valverde-Barrantes, O. J., Raich, J. W. and Russell, A. E. (2007). Fine root mass, growth and nitrogen content for six tropical tree species. Plant and Soil 290:257370.
Vitousek, P. M. and Sanford, R. L. Jr (1986). Nutrient cycling in moist tropical forests. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 17:137167.
Vogel, A. I. (1969). A Text Book of the Qualitative Inorganic Analysis including Elementary Instrumental Analysis, 744745. London: The English Language Book Society and Longman.
Vogt, K. A. and Presson, H. (1991). Root methods. In Techniques and Approaches in Forest Tree Ecophysiology, 477502 (Eds Lassoie, J. P. and Hinkley, C.). Boca Raton, FL: RC Press.
Vogt, K. A., Vogt, D. J. and Bloomfield, J. (1998). Analysis of some direct and indirect methods for estimating root biomass and production of forests at an ecosystem level. Plant and Soil 200:7189.
Vogt, K. A., Vogt, D. J., Palmiotto, P. A., Boon, P., O'Hara, J. and Asbjornsen, H. (1996). Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species. Plant and Soil 187:159219.


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed