Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:31:56.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fertilizer Responses in Swamp Rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Northern Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

Th. Y. Bredero
Affiliation:
Federal Rice Research Station, Badeggi via Minna, Northern Nigeria*

Summary

A series of N × P field experiments with irrigated rice, conducted over the period 1958–1962 on the same plots on alluvial soils considered representative for most of the bottom ‘fadama’ land in Niger and Ilorin Provinces, Northern Nigeria, showed small increases with medium dressings of P2O5 and large responses with high dressings of N. The N responses showed considerable variation between soil types and years. The variation between soil types was attributed to different cation exchange capacities, which resulted in NH4′ leaching from the root zone at different rates. The variation in N responses between years was probably due to different physiological timings of the top dressings. Results of chemical analyses of straw and grain samples of the 1961 crop were used to estimate the percentage of N and P2O5 recovered by the crop with the various treatments over the untreated plots in the previous years of the experiments on two soil types. The recovery percentages for the different levels of N on the clay ‘basin’ soils were moderate, about 18 per cent, whereas those for the sandy ‘levee’ soils were lower, averaging only 9 per cent. Recovery of P2O5 varied from good at medium N levels (14 per cent) to moderate at high N levels (9 per cent) on the basin soils. Recovery of P2O5 on the levee soils was poor. The utilisation of the recovered N (75 lb paddy/lb N) and P2O5 (42 lb paddy/lb P2O5) was very good for N and fair for P2O5.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abeywardena, V. (1961). Trop. Agriculturist, 117, 4.Google Scholar
Bredero, Th. J. (1963). Memo. 48. Fed. Dept. Agric. Res., Ibadan.Google Scholar
Bredero, Th. J. (1964). Trop. Agric. Trin. 41, 2.Google Scholar
Glander, H. & Peter, A. (1962). Green bull. 6 Verl. gessellacl. f. Ackerl MB 4.Google Scholar
Grist, D. H. (1959). Rice, London: Longmans Green, 3rd ed.Google Scholar
Hall, V. L. (1960). Ark. Agric. Exp. Sta. Rep. Ser. 92.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, J. E. Y. (1959). Trop. Agric. Trin. 36, 2.Google Scholar
Higgins, G. M., Ramsay, P. M. & Pullan, R. A. (1960). Soil Surv. Sect. Bull. 10, R.R.S. Samaru.Google Scholar
Jacob, A.Uexkiill, H.v. (1960). Fertilizer use, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Kix, M. C. & Hall, V. L. (1960). I.R.C. Newsl. 10, 2.Google Scholar
Mikkelson, P. S. & Finfrock, D. C. (1957). Agron. J. 49, 296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukerjee, H. N. (1957). I.R.C. Newsl. 6, 1.Google Scholar
Nedeco, (1961). Niger Dam Project, 5, 7.Google Scholar
Takahashi, J. (1963). Rep. Fed. Govt. of Nigeria, Badeggi (unpublished).Google Scholar