Hostname: page-component-7d684dbfc8-4nnqn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-09-25T10:20:43.068Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2011

Agricultural University of Athens, Faculty of Crop Science, Laboratory of Agronomy, 75, Iera Odos Street, 11855 Athens, Greece
Agricultural University of Athens, Faculty of Crop Science, Laboratory of Agronomy, 75, Iera Odos Street, 11855 Athens, Greece
Agricultural University of Athens, Faculty of Crop Science, Laboratory of Agronomy, 75, Iera Odos Street, 11855 Athens, Greece
Agricultural University of Athens, Faculty of Crop Science, Laboratory of Agronomy, 75, Iera Odos Street, 11855 Athens, Greece
Benaki Phytopathological Institute, Department of Weed Science, 8 St Delta Street, 14561, Kifissia, Greece
Agricultural University of Athens, Faculty of Crop Science, Laboratory of Agronomy, 75, Iera Odos Street, 11855 Athens, Greece
Corresponding author.


The presence of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) in crops is increasing in arid and semi-arid environments. Field experiments were conducted in Greece in 2009 and 2010 to determine the influence of velvetleaf emergence time and maize (Zea mays) hybrids with different growth rates on maize yield and velvetleaf growth and fecundity. Velvetleaf was uniformly seeded in order to emerge at the 1, 3, 5 and 7-leaf stage of maize (V1, V3, V5 and V7 growth stages, respectively). Velvetleaf biomass, canopy area and seed production were significantly affected by the date of velvetleaf emergence. Velvetleaf plants emerging just after maize (V1) produced 7–17 times lower seed number, compared with the V5 growth stage. Maximum maize grain yield loss ranged from 26 to 37% for early emerging velvetleaf, and less than 6% yield loss occurred from velvetleaf seedlings emerging at V7 growth stage. Maize hybrids with high initial growth rate seem to be more competitive than the other hybrids. The results of this study are essential in the development of an integrated weed management strategy for maize in semi-arid environments, since they highlight the importance of the careful selection of a competitive maize hybrid and avoidance of early velvetleaf emergence.

Research Article
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Andersen, R. N., Menges, R. M. and Conn, J. S. (1985). Variability in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and reproduction beyond its current range in North America. Weed Science 33:507512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosnic, A. C. and Swanton, C. J. (1997). Influence of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) time of emergence and density on corn (Zea mays). Weed Science 45:276282.Google Scholar
Callaway, M. B. (1992). A compendium of crop varietal tolerance to weeds. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 7:169180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardina, J., Regnier, E. and Sparrow, D. (1995). Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition and economic thresholds in conventional and no-tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Science 43:8187.Google Scholar
Chikoye, D., Weise, S. F. and Swanton, C. J. (1995). Influence of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) time of emergence and density on white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Science 43:375380.Google Scholar
Christensen, S. (1995). Weed suppressive ability of spring barley cultivars. Weed Research 35:241247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cirilo, A. G. and Andrade, F. H. (1994). Sowing date and maize productivity: II. Kernel number determination. Crop Science 34:10441046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, S. A., Kleinjan, J., Clay, D. E., Forcella, F. and Batchelor, W. (2005). Growth and fecundity of several weed species in corn and soybean. Agronomy Journal 97:294302.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. D. (1985). A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Annals of Applied Biology 107:239252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousens, R., Brain, P., O'Donovan, J. T. and O'Sullivan, P. A. (1987). The use of biologically realistic equations to describe the effects of weed density and relative time of emergence on crop yield. Weed Science 35:720725.Google Scholar
Evans, S. P., Knezevic, S. Z., Lindquist, J. T. and Shapiro, C. A. (2003). Influence of nitrogen and duration of weed interference on corn growth and development. Weed Science 51:546556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F. (1987). Tolerance of weed competition associated with high leaf-area expansion rate in tall fescue. Crop Science 27:146147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. R., Swanton, C. J. and Anderson, G. W. (1992). The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Science 40:441447.Google Scholar
Hartzler, R. G. (1996). Velvetleaf population dynamics following a single year's seed rain. Weed Technology 10:581586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, J. S. and Boose, A. B. (2000). Potential for spread of Abutilon theophrasti in California. Weed Science 48:4352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, M. and Taylorson, R. B. (1984). Hardseededness and germinability of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) as affected by temperature and moisture. Weed Science 32:111115.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z. and Horak, M. J. (1998). Influence of emergence time and density on redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Science 46:665672.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Weise, S. F. and Swanton, C. J. (1994). Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Science 42:568573.Google Scholar
Lindquist, J. L. and Mortensen, D. A. (1998). Tolerance and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) suppressive ability of two old and two modern corn (Zea mays) hybrids. Weed Science 46:569574.Google Scholar
Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A. and Johnson, B. E. (1998). Mechanisms of corn tolerance and velvetleaf suppressive ability. Agronomy Journal 90:787792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohler, C. L., Frisch, J. C. and Pleasant, J. Mt., 1997. Evaluation of mechanical weed management programs for corn (Zea mays L.). Weed Technology 11:123131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otequi, M. E., Nicolini, M. G., Ruiz, R. A. and Dodds, P. A. (1995). Sowing date effects on grain yield components for different maize genotypes. Agronomy Journal 87:2933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roggenkamp, G. J., Mason, S. C. and Martin, A. R. (2000). Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and green foxtail (Setaria viridis) response to corn (Zea mays) hybrid. Weed Technology 14:304311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sattin, M., Zanin, G. and Berti, A. (1992). Case history for weed competition/population ecology: velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technology 6:213219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, N. R. (1984). Velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae), history and economic impact in the United States. Economic Botany 38:407416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M. and Alm, D. M. (1993). Survey results on environmental issues and weed science research priorities within the corn belt. Weed Technology 7:763770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, C. J. and Weise, S. F. (1991). Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technology 5:657663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollenaar, M., Nissanka, S. P., Aguilera, A., Weise, S. F. and Swanton, C. J. (1994). Effect of weed interference and soil nitrogen on four maize hybrids. Agronomy Journal 86:596601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travlos, I. S., Economou, G. and Kanatas, P. J. (2011). Corn and barnyardgrass competition as influenced by relative time of emergence and corn hybrid. Agronomy Journal 103:16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, S. I. (1990). Allozyme and life history variation in five northwardly colonizing North American weed species. Plant Systematics and Evolution 169:4154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, S. I. and Black, L. S. (1986). Geneological variation in recently established populations of Abutilon theophrasti (velvetleaf). Canadian Journal of Botany 64:16321643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, E. L., Curran, W. S., Harper, J. K., Roth, G. W. and Knievel, D. P. (2004). Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference and seed production in corn silage and grain. Weed Technology 18:779783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanin, G. and Sattin, M. (1988). Threshold level and seed production of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medicus) in maize. Weed Research 28:347352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar