Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
EnglishFrançais
European Review European Review

Article contents

The Pluralist Interpretation of Chinese Marxist Aesthetics in Contemporary European Scholarship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2020

Qilin Fu  and
Shubo Gao
Qilin Fu
Affiliation:
College of Literature and Journalism, Sichuan University, 24 Yihuan Road, Chengdu610064, People’s Republic of China. Email: fql@scu.edu.cn
Shubo Gao
Affiliation:
College of Literature and Journalism, Sichuan University, 24 Yihuan Road, Chengdu610064, People’s Republic of China. Email: fql@scu.edu.cn
Corresponding
E-mail address:
fql@scu.edu.cn
Get access
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Europe there have appeared several important collections on Marxist literary theory, such as Francis Mulhern’s Contemporary Marxist Literary Criticism (1992) and Terry Eagleton and Drew Milne’s Marxist Literary Theory: A Reader (1996). However, Chinese voices are not included at all in these volumes. Maybe this lacuna results from a lack of awareness of Chinese Marxist aesthetics on the part of most European literary historians and critics. In this article, we seek to discuss the circumstances of European scholars’ contacts with Chinese Marxist aesthetics, mainly in the 1960s and 1970s. Starting from the variation theory perspective proposed by Shunqing Cao we will discuss how European scholars read and misread what they perceived as the meaning and universal applicability of what was happening in China at the time. The discussion is divided into three parts: the utopian interpretation of the Chinese theory of revolution in France, the critical reception by Eastern European Marxists, and the sympathetic interpretation by sinologists such as the Dutch diplomat and literary scholar Douwe Fokkema.

Type
Articles
Information
European Review , First View , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
© 2020 Academia Europaea

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.
If you should have access and can't see this content please contact technical support.

References

Ahmad, A (2012) Three ‘turns’ to Marx: Derrida, Žižek, Badiou. Social Scientist 40(7/8), 43–59.Google Scholar
Althusser, L (1969) For Marx. Translated by Brewster, B.London: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Althusser, L and Balibar, E (1970) Reading Capital. Translated by Brewster, B.London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Balibar, E and Macherey, P (1996) On literature as an ideological form. In Eagleton, T and Milne, D (eds), Marxist Literary Theory: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Feher, F and Heller, A (1987) Eastern Left – Western Left. Cambridge and New York: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fokkema, D and Ibsch, E (1995 [1978]) Theories of Literature in the Twentieth Century. London: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Fu, QL (2015) The reception of Mao’s ‘Talks at the Yan’an Forum on Literature and Art’ in English-language scholarship. Comparative Literature and Culture 17(1), Article 12, http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/vol17/iss1/12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gálik, M (1980) The Genesis of Modern Chinese Literary Criticism (1917–1930). Bratislava: Veda Publishing House.Google Scholar
Hewlett, N (2010) Badiou, Balibar, Rancière: Re-thinking Emancipation. London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Kolakowski, L (2008) Main Currents of Marxism. Translated by Falla, PS.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kosik, K (1976) Dialectics of the Concrete: A Study on Problems of Man and World. Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Love, J and May, T (2008) From universality to equality: Badiou’s critique of Rancière. Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 12(2), 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, X (1977) Pamphlets et Libelles. Paris: Maspero. (On the back cover of the book Althusser talks about Lu Xun.)Google Scholar
Mao, TT (1971) Selected Reading from the Works of Mao Tse-Tung (A). Peking: Foreign Language Press.Google Scholar
Marković, M (1974) The Contemporary Marx: Essays on Humanist Communism. Nottingham: Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation Ltd.Google Scholar
Morawski, S (1978) Inquiries into the Fundamentals of Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pickowicz, PG (1980) Marxist Literary Thought and China: A Conceptual Framework. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pickowicz, PG (1981) Marxist Literary Thought in China: The Influence of Ch’ü Ch’iu-pai. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Průšek, J (1962) Basic problems of the history of modern Chinese literature and C. T. Hsia, a history of modern Chinese fiction. Toungpao 49(1), 357–404.Google Scholar
Průšek, J (1987) Modern Chinese Literature: Essays. Translated by Li Yanqiao. Changsha: Hunan Literature and Art Press.Google Scholar
Rancière, J (2004) The politics of literature. Substance 33(1), 10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rancière, J (2011) Althusser’s Lesson. Translated by Battista, E. London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Wolin, R (2010) The Wind from the East: French Intellectuals, the Cultural Revolution and the Legacy of the 1960s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zapotocky, A (1958) The party must lead literature and arts. In For Socialist Realism, vol. II. Beijing: Writer’s Press.Google Scholar
Žižek, S (2007) Introduction: Mao Tse-tung, or the Marxist lord of misrule. In Tse-tung, Mao, On Practice and Contradiction. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 12 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 10th June 2020 - 24th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-76cb886bbf-kdwz2 Total loading time: 0.391 Render date: 2021-01-24T04:12:54.927Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Pluralist Interpretation of Chinese Marxist Aesthetics in Contemporary European Scholarship
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The Pluralist Interpretation of Chinese Marxist Aesthetics in Contemporary European Scholarship
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The Pluralist Interpretation of Chinese Marxist Aesthetics in Contemporary European Scholarship
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *