Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-vddjc Total loading time: 3.368 Render date: 2021-04-17T12:01:45.299Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

The Obsolescence of almost all theories concerning International Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Abstract

The implosion of the Soviet empire undermined most theories concerning International Relations. Only a few political scientists have conceded afterwards the weakness of their theories, which were mostly ahistorical, based on the deformation of politics with history omitted. The question asked in this article is what kind of International Relations as a discipline may be more reliable and helpful in the future.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

1.Holsti, K. (1993) International relations at the end of the millenium. Review of International Studies 19, (1993), 408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Kissinger, H. (1994) Diplomacy (New York) pp. 804835.Google Scholar
3.Kratochwil, F. (1993) The embarassment of changes; neorealism as the science of Realpolitik without politics. Review of International Studies, 19 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hoffmann, S. (1977) An American social science: international relations Daedelus, 20, 59.Google Scholar
5.Rosenau, J. (1996) Probing puzzles persistently: a desirable but improbable function for I.R. theory. In Smith, S., Booth, K., and Zalewski, M. (eds.), International Theory, Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge) pp. 309317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Wight, M. (1996) Why is there no international theory?, In Butterfield, H. and Wight, M. (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations. Essays in the Theory of International Politics (London) pp. 1734.Google Scholar
7.Knudsen, T. L. (1992) A History of International Relations (Manchester) p. 3.Google Scholar
8.Bremer, S. A. (1992) Dangerous dyads: conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816–1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36, 309341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Siccama, J. G. (1993) Realistische en idealistische perspectevieven op Europese veiligheid. Een kwantitatief-historische toetsing. Transaktie, 22, 210224. See also Paul Schroeder's criticism of George Blainey's The Causes of War (Melbourne 1977) discussed in T. C. W. Banning (1994) P. W. Schroeder's concert of Europe, The International History Review 16, 713.Google Scholar
10.Gaddis, J. L. (1992) International relations theory and the end of the Cold War. International Security, 17, 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Fisher, D. H. (1970) Historians' Fallacies (New York), p. 90.Google Scholar
12.Mearshheimer, J. (1990) Back to the future. Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security, 15, 556. (Correspondence on this provocative article in the fall 1990 issue of the same journal).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Walker, R. B. J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge) p. 6.Google Scholar
14.Gaddis, J. L. (1993) The tragedy of Cold War history. Diplomatic History, 17, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Nietzsche, F. (1956) Werke, vol. 2 (Munich) p. 820.Google Scholar
16.Ruggie, J. G. (1993) Territoriality and beyond; problematizing modernity in international relations. International Organization, 47, 139174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Schmitter, P. C. (1986) An introduction to Southern European transitions from authoritarian rule: Italy, Greece, Portugal, Spain and Turkey. In O'Donnell, G., Schmitter, P. C. and Whitehead, L. (eds.), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Prospects for Democracy (Baltimore) pp. 310.Google Scholar
18.Lebow, R. N. and Risse-Kappen, T. (eds) (1995) International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War. (New York) p. 247.Google Scholar
19.Halliday, F. (1995) International relations and discontents. International Affairs, 71, 746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Joffe, J. (1995) Bismark or Britain? Towards an American grand strategy after bipolarity International Security, 19, 94117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Rosecrance, R. (1973) International Relations: Peace or War? (New York) 25.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 74 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Obsolescence of almost all theories concerning International Relations
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The Obsolescence of almost all theories concerning International Relations
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The Obsolescence of almost all theories concerning International Relations
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *