Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T20:28:21.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Expressions, Mediations, and Exclusions in Post-secular Societies: Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2012

Klas Grinell*
Affiliation:
Museum of World Culture, PO Box 5303, SE-402 27 Gothenburg, Sweden. Email: klas.grinell@varldskulturmuseet.se
Urban Strandberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, PO Box 711, SE-405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden. Email: urban.strandberg@gu.se

Abstract

Modernist theories of development and democratization predicted that secularization would lead to the disappearance of religion. This has not happened. But contemporary democratic states are secular and define religion as a private matter. At the same time, a politics of recognizing religiosity is deeply rooted in the modern state, and it is obvious that intangible values play an important role and have a valid claim to public spaces. On the metaphorical agora, the square that constitutes the middle ground between the cathedral and the parliament, commitment born in the cathedral is transformed into rational arguments that can be presented in parliament. But who governs the square? Do spiritual values need a public defence? Can or should all religious commitments and expressions be transformed into profane arguments? How could public spaces be designed and maintained to promote peaceful mediations between profane, sacred and other principled commitments? By assembling artistic and academic thinkers who do not confine themselves to intellectual analysis, but demand our involvement and our realization that we are part of the processes we are considering, this Focus contributes to a discussion of religiosity and public spaces in post-secular societies.

Type
Focus: Religiosity and Public Spaces
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Notes

1.Eugenio, T. (1997) Penser la religion (Barcelona: Ediciones Destino).Google Scholar
2.Kauffman, S. A. (2008) Reinventing the Sacred: A New View of Science, Reason, and Religion (New York: Basic Books), p. 87.Google Scholar
3.an-Naim, A. A. (2008) Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Sharia (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), p. 214.Google Scholar
4.Casanova, J. (1994) Public Religions in the Modern World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Berger, P. and Zijderveld, A. (2009) In Praise of Doubt: How to have Convictions without becoming a Fanatic (New York: HarperCollins), p. 18.Google Scholar
6.Seligman, A., Weller, R. P., Puett, M. J. and Simon, B. (2008) Ritual and its Consequences: an Essay on the Limits of Sincerity (New York: Oxford University Press), p. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Zizek, S. (2000) The Fragile Absolute – Or, Why is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting for (London: Verso).Google Scholar
8.Ramadan, T. (2009) Radical Reform: Islamic Ethics and Liberation (New York: Oxford University Press), p. 34.Google Scholar
9.Sigurdson, O. (2009) Det postsekulära tillståndet: religion, modernitet, politik [The Post Secular Predicament: Religion, Modernity, Politics] (Göteborg: Glänta), p. 333.Google Scholar
10.Jones, J. M. (2007) Some Americans reluctant to vote for Mormon, 72-year-old presidential candidates. Gallup. http://www.gallup.com/poll/26611/Some-Americans-Reluctant-Vote-Mormon-72YearOld-Presidential-Candidates.aspx. [accessed 16 September 2010].Google Scholar