Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:48:33.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PW01-177 - Jumping To Conclusions In Psychotic Patients: A Comparison With Siblings And Healthy Controls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

M.L. Barrigon
Affiliation:
Psychiatry Service, Santa Ana Hospital, Motril, Spain Neurodevelopmental Psychiatry Research Unit, Jaén Medical Center, Jaén, Spain
J.L. Rubio
Affiliation:
Neurodevelopmental Psychiatry Research Unit, Jaén Medical Center, Jaén, Spain University of Granada, Faculty of Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychology, Spain
M. Ruiz-Veguilla
Affiliation:
Neurodevelopmental Psychiatry Research Unit, Jaén Medical Center, Jaén, Spain
L. Hernández
Affiliation:
Neuroevelopmental Psychiatry Research Unit, Jaén Medical Center, Granada, Spain
M. Ferrin
Affiliation:
Neurodevelopmental Psychiatry Research Unit, Jaén Medical Center, Jaén, Spain Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
M.D. Salcedo
Affiliation:
Neurodevelopmental Psychiatry Research Unit, Jaén Medical Center, Jaén, Spain
J.M. Moreno
Affiliation:
Neurodevelopmental Psychiatry Research Unit, Jaén Medical Center, Jaén, Spain

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives

To explore a cognitive bias-Jumping to Conclusions-in patients with schizophrenia and to compare with non-psychotic siblings and healthy controls by means of the Picture Decision Task (PDT).

Methods

42 patients with schizophrenia, 20 non-psychotic siblings and 77 healthy controls were compared in the PCT. This task consists of showing drawings of common objects that are displayed on a computer screen in decreasing degrees of fragmentation: new features are added in eight successive stages, until the entire object is eventually manifest. There are two kinds of trials (“cued” and “uncued”; that is, with and without interpretative clues). According to the responses, five parameters were calculated: Jumping To Conclusions at first stage-that is, with the very first drawing-(JTC-1), Plausibility Rating at first stage (PR-1), Draws To Decision (DTD), Time Response at first stage (TR-1) and Time Response for Draw to Decision (TR-DTD)

Results

In comparison with siblings and controls, more of the schizophrenia patients made a definitive decision at the first stage (represented by a significantly higher JTC-1), and they showed a higher Plausibility Rating (represented by a higher PR-1) than siblings and controls. For the uncued trials, patients needed fewer stages (a lower DTD) when making a decision than siblings (5.53±0.20 vs. 7.04±0.28; p=0.001) and controls (5.53±0.20 vs. 6.83±0.14; p=0.001).

Conclusions

These results suggest that patients make quick decisions with a high level of conviction and may manifest a data-gathering bias. Our results may indicate some degree of faulty appraisal and an inability to tolerate ambiguity when faced with decision-making.

Type
Psychotic disorders / Schizophrenia
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2009
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.