Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Predictors of personal continuity of care of patients with severe mental illness: A comparison across five European countries

  • Pierre Smith (a1), Pablo Nicaise (a1), Domenico Giacco (a2), Victoria jane Bird (a2), Michael Bauer (a3), Mirella Ruggeri (a4), Marta Welbel (a5), Andrea Pfennig (a3), Antonio Lasalvia (a6), Jacek Moskalewicz (a5), Stefan Priebe (a2) and Vincent Lorant (a6)...

Abstract

Background:

In Europe, at discharge from a psychiatric hospital, patients with severe mental illness may be exposed to one of two main care approaches: personal continuity, where one clinician is responsible for in- and outpatient care, and specialisation, where various clinicians are. Such exposure is decided through patient-clinician agreement or at the organisational level, depending on the country’s health system. Since personal continuity would be more suitable for patients with complex psychosocial needs, the aim of this study was to identify predictors of patients’ exposure to care approaches in different European countries.

Methods:

Data were collected on 7302 psychiatric hospitalised patients in 2015 in Germany, Poland, and Belgium (patient-level exposure); and in the UK and Italy (organisational-level exposure). At discharge, patients were exposed to one of the care approaches according to usual practice. Putative predictors of exposure at patients’ discharge were assessed in both groups of countries.

Results:

Socially disadvantaged patients were significantly more exposed to personal continuity. In all countries, the main predictor of exposure was the admission hospital, except in Germany, where having a diagnosis of psychosis and a higher education status were predictors of exposure to personal continuity. In the UK, hospitals practising personal continuity had a more socially disadvantaged patient population.

Conclusion:

Even in countries where exposure is decided through patient-clinician agreement, it was the admission hospital, not patient characteristics, that predicted exposure to care approaches. Nevertheless, organisational decisions in hospitals tend to expose socially disadvantaged patients to personal continuity.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Predictors of personal continuity of care of patients with severe mental illness: A comparison across five European countries
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Predictors of personal continuity of care of patients with severe mental illness: A comparison across five European countries
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Predictors of personal continuity of care of patients with severe mental illness: A comparison across five European countries
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. E-mail address: pierre.smith@uclouvain.be

References

Hide All
[1]Haggerty, JLReid, RJFreeman, GKStarfield, BHAdair, CEMcKendry, RContinuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ 2003; 327:1219-21.
[2]Adair, CEMcDougall, GMBeckie, AJoyce, AMitton, CWild, CT et al. History and measurement of continuity of care in mental health services and evidence of its role in outcomes. Psychiatr Serv 2003; 54:1351-6.
[3]Khandaker, GC, SDibben, CKar Ray, MFrom a sector-based service model to a functional one. Psychiatr Bull 2009; 33:329-32.
[4]Lodge, GHow did we let it come to this? A plea for the principle of continuity of care. Psychiatrist 2012; 36:361-3.
[5]Omer, SPriebe, SGiacco, DContinuity across inpatient and outpatient mental health care or specialisation of teams? A systematic review. Eur Psychiatry 2015; 30:258-70.
[6]Begum, MBrown, KPelosi, ACrabb, JMcTaggart, JMitchell, C et al. Survey of patients’ view on functional split of consultant psychiatrists. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13:362.
[7]Schmidt-Kraepelin, CJanssen, BGaebel, WPrevention of rehospitalization in schizophrenia: results of an integrated care project in Germany. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 259(Suppl 2)2009; S205-212.
[8]Mellsop, GWBlair-West, GWDuraiappah, VThe effect of a new integrated mental health service on hospitalisation. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1997; 31:480-3.
[9]Lambert, MBock, TSchottle, DGolks, DMeister, KRietschel, L et al. Assertive community treatment as part of integrated care versus standard care: a 12-month trial in patients with first- and multiple-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders treated with quetiapine immediate release (ACCESS trial). J Clin Psychiatry 2010; 71:1313-23.
[10]Bird, VJGiacco, DNicaise, PPfennig, ALasalvia, AWelbel, M et al. In-patient treatment in functional and sectorised care: patient satisfaction and length of stay. Br J Psychiatry 2018; 212:81-7.
[11]Kar, NSingh, SPTungaraza, TERoy, SO’Brien, MCooper, D et al. Staff satisfaction in the functionalisation of psychiatric in-patient care. Ment Illn. 2012; 4:e6.
[12]Le Bas, JKing, RBlock, MThe impact of mental health service integration on systemic function: a staff perspective. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1998; 32:666-72.
[13]Laugharne, RPM. Sector and functional models of consultant care: in-patient satisfaction with psychiatrists. Psychiatr Bull 2012;36(7):254-6.
[14]Sytema, SMicciolo, RTansella, MContinuity of care for patients with schizophrenia and related disorders: a comparative south-Verona and Groningen case-register study. Psychol Med 1997; 27:1355-62.
[15]Leutz, WNFive laws for integrating medical and social services: lessons from the United States and the United Kingdom. Milbank Q 1999; 77:77-110iv-v..
[16]Lunt, NSRExworthy, MGreen, SHorsfall, DMannion, RMedical tourism: treatments, markets and health system implications: a scoping review. OECD Health Policy Studies 2004.
[17]Nutting, PAGoodwin, MAFlocke, SAZyzanski, SJStange, KCContinuity of primary care: to whom does it matter and when?. Ann Fam Med 2003; 1:149-55.
[18]Weiss, LJBlustein, JFaithful patients: the effect of long-term physician-patient relationships on the costs and use of health care by older Americans. Am J Public Health 1996; 86:1742-7.
[19]Carrillo, JECarrillo, VAPerez, HRSalas-Lopez, DNatale-Pereira, AByron, ATDefining and targeting health care access barriers. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2011; 22:562-75.
[20]Gulliford, MFigueroa-Munoz, JMorgan, MHughes, DGibson, BBeech, R et al. What does’ access to health care’ mean?. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002; 7:186-8.
[21]Alegria, MBijl, RVLin, EWalters, EEKessler, RCIncome differences in persons seeking outpatient treatment for mental disorders: a comparison of The United States with Ontario and The Netherlands. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000; 57:383-91.
[22]Sorensen, THOlsen, KRVedsted, PAssociation between general practice referral rates and patients’ socioeconomic status and access to specialised health care a population-based nationwide study. Health Policy 2009; 92:180-6.
[23]Steele, LSGlazier, RHLin, EInequity in mental health care under Canadian universal health coverage. Psychiatr Serv 2006; 57:317-24.
[24]van Doorslaer, EMasseria, CKoolman, XOHER, GroupInequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries. CMAJ 2006; 174:177-83.
[25]Packness, AWaldorff, FBChristensen, RDHastrup, LHSimonsen, EVestergaard, M et al. Impact of socioeconomic position and distance on mental health care utilization: a nationwide Danish follow-up study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2017; 52:1405-13.
[26]Sareen, JJagdeo, ACox, BJClara, Iten Have, MBelik, SL et al. Perceived barriers to mental health service utilization in the United States, Ontario, and the Netherlands. Psychiatr Serv 2007; 58:357-64.
[27]Wendt, CFrisina, LRothgang, HHealthcare system types: a conceptual framework for comparison. Social Policy Admin 2009;43(1):70-90.
[28]Wendt, CInternational comparison of health care systems. Overview of state of research. Gesundheitswesen 2006; 68:593-9.
[29]Paris, VDevaux, MWei, LHealth systems institutional characteristics: a survey of 29 OECD countries (50) Retrieved from Paris 2010 http://wwwoecdorg/els/health/workingpapers.
[30]Giacco, DBird, VJMcCrone, PLorant, VNicaise, PPfennig, A et al. Specialised teams or personal continuity across inpatient and outpatient mental healthcare? Study protocol for a natural experiment. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e008996.
[31]Dimitri, GGiacco, DBauer, MBird, VGreenberg, LLasalvia, A et al. Predictors of lenght of stay in psychiatric inpatient units: does their effect vary across countries?. European Psychiatry 2017; 3592:1-7.
[32]Leatherdale, STNatural experiment methodology for research: a review of how different methods can support real-world research. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2018.
[33]Anderson, KKFuhrer, RMalla, AKThe pathways to mental health care of first-episode psychosis patients: a systematic review. Psychol Med 2010; 40:1585-97.
[34]Guy, WClinical global impressions (CGI) scale 2000, Psychiatric Measures, APA Washington DC.
[35]Priebe, SWatzke, SHansson, LBurns, TObjective social outcomes index (SIX): a method to summarise objective indicators of social outcomes in mental health care. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2008; 118:57-63.
[36]Forrest, CBNutting, PAvon Schrader, SRohde, CStarfield, BPrimary care physician specialty referral decision making: patient, physician, and health care system determinants. Med Decis Making 2006; 26:76-85.
[37]Shadmi, EFreund, TTargeting patients for multimorbid care management interventions: the case for equity in high-risk patient identification. Int J Equity Health 2013;12(70):.
[38]Forrest, CBNutting, PWerner, JJStarfield, Bvon Schrader, SRohde, CManaged health plan effects on the specialty referral process: results from the ambulatory sentinel practice network referral study. Med Care 2003; 41:242-53.
[39]Forrest, CBGlade, GBStarfield, BBaker, AEKang, MReid, RJGatekeeping and referral of children and adolescents to specialty care. Pediatrics 1999; 104:28-34.
[40]Grard, APablo, NLorant, VEvaluation de la réforme « vers de meilleurs soins en santé mentale » – résultats 2014. Acta Psychiatrica Belgica 2015115/1.
[41]Lambert, MBock, TDaubmann, AMeigel-Schleiff, CLange, BLange, M et al. [The Hamburg-model of integrated care for patients with psychosis: part 1. Rationale, treatment concept and results of the pre-study]. Psychiatr Prax 2014; 41:257-65.
[42]Busse, RBlümel, MGermany: Health system review. Health systems in transition 16 2014 1-301.
[43]Campbell, MFitzpatrick, RHaines, AKinmonth, ALSandercock, PSpiegelhalter, D et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2000; 321:694-6.

Keywords

Predictors of personal continuity of care of patients with severe mental illness: A comparison across five European countries

  • Pierre Smith (a1), Pablo Nicaise (a1), Domenico Giacco (a2), Victoria jane Bird (a2), Michael Bauer (a3), Mirella Ruggeri (a4), Marta Welbel (a5), Andrea Pfennig (a3), Antonio Lasalvia (a6), Jacek Moskalewicz (a5), Stefan Priebe (a2) and Vincent Lorant (a6)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Predictors of personal continuity of care of patients with severe mental illness: A comparison across five European countries

  • Pierre Smith (a1), Pablo Nicaise (a1), Domenico Giacco (a2), Victoria jane Bird (a2), Michael Bauer (a3), Mirella Ruggeri (a4), Marta Welbel (a5), Andrea Pfennig (a3), Antonio Lasalvia (a6), Jacek Moskalewicz (a5), Stefan Priebe (a2) and Vincent Lorant (a6)...
Submit a response

Comments

We encountered an error trying to retrieve Comments for this article. Please try again or contact Customer Services

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *