Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:28:21.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P-206 - Residual Symptoms in Bipolar Disorder: how to Define and to Manage Them in Clinical Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

L. Samalin
Affiliation:
CHU de Clermont Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand
L. Yon
Affiliation:
GH Albert Chenevier Henri Mondor, Créteil
B. Giordana
Affiliation:
Hopital Pasteur, Nice
V. Milhet
Affiliation:
GH Albert Chenevier Henri Mondor, Créteil
W. El Hage
Affiliation:
CPU Tours Nord, Saint Cyr Sur Loire
P. Courtet
Affiliation:
Hopital Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France
F. Bellivier
Affiliation:
GH Albert Chenevier Henri Mondor, Créteil
P.M. Llorca
Affiliation:
CHU de Clermont Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Residual symptoms (RS) are common in bipolar disorder. There is no clear consensus on how RS are defined, and individual clinicians may have their own perceptions of this clinical problem.

Objective:

The aim of this study is to define RS and to describe their management using a qualitative analysis.

Methods:

A qualitative study was conducted. Data were collected from five focus groups including 41 psychiatrists all over France. An interview guide was used, including questions about definition of RS, their assessment and influence on the management of bipolar patients. Content analysis was used to identify themes emerging from the focus groups.

Results:

There was no consensus among participants regarding an explicit definition of RS. The definition appears to be multifactorial, interactive and scalable. It is based both on the psychiatrist's therapeutic objectives and patient's complaints. Eight major RS was identified: suicidal risk, emotional dysregulation, compliance, cognitive impairment, sleep disorder, functional disability, complaints from the patients and the development of comorbidities.

Content analysis underlines the fact that: standardized tools are not used in clinical practice; RS are a constant preoccupation; they justify optimisation of medication and adjustment of visit frequency.

Conclusions:

Qualitative study is helpful to define and describe RS. Identifying RS is an important way of achieving implementation strategies and improve management of bipolar patients.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.