Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

EPA-1666 – Physical and Psychic Birth Coincide. about Bioethical Implications of the Birth Theory (1972)

  • S. Santomauro (a1), C. Di Agostino (a2), C. Iannaco (a3), A. Homberg (a4), L. Giorgini (a4), E. Gerbhardt (a4), D. Montanaro (a5), R. Pompei (a6), F. Padrevecchi (a7), R. Ricciardi (a8) and M. Petrucci (a4)...

Abstract

After refusing the belief that a voluntary interruption of pregnancy (VIP) must necessarily lead to depression, the paper reports the clinical observation according to which, after a VIP, guilt feelings leading to depression may but do not have to inevitably arise in women, in their partners, in medical staff.

These kind of guilt feelings are centred on the self accusation of having taken away the possibility of a life to a child. So the point is whether the embryo and the fetus can be considered scientifically human life.

Surprisingly, it was psychiatry that gave an important answer to this relevant issue. As a matter of fact, the so-called Birth Theory - which has been laid down by the Italian Psychiatrist and Psychotherapist Massimo Fagioli since 1972 – is hard-and-fast as to this point; human life presupposes a psychic activity which is absent in the fetus.

According to this theory, the fetus is a biological existence which becomes a potential human being from the 22nd/24th week of pregnancy only. Such a potentiality of the fetus can occur only at the very moment of birth when the first stimulation of the retina, caused by the light, originates a transformation of the brain functioning, generating the beginning of its psychic activity in a specific form defined by the author as’imaginative capability’.

It is even more surprising that the Birth Theory, initially elaborated on the basis of clinical observations and deductive reasoning, has recently received important, increasing backing from fetal and neonatal neurology.

Copyright

EPA-1666 – Physical and Psychic Birth Coincide. about Bioethical Implications of the Birth Theory (1972)

  • S. Santomauro (a1), C. Di Agostino (a2), C. Iannaco (a3), A. Homberg (a4), L. Giorgini (a4), E. Gerbhardt (a4), D. Montanaro (a5), R. Pompei (a6), F. Padrevecchi (a7), R. Ricciardi (a8) and M. Petrucci (a4)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

EPA-1666 – Physical and Psychic Birth Coincide. about Bioethical Implications of the Birth Theory (1972)

  • S. Santomauro (a1), C. Di Agostino (a2), C. Iannaco (a3), A. Homberg (a4), L. Giorgini (a4), E. Gerbhardt (a4), D. Montanaro (a5), R. Pompei (a6), F. Padrevecchi (a7), R. Ricciardi (a8) and M. Petrucci (a4)...
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *