Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:14:48.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2103 – Cognitive Adaptation Training In An Assertive Community Treatment Setting For Outpatients With Schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

J.P. Hansen
Affiliation:
Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg
B. Østergaard
Affiliation:
Research Unit of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense
M. Nordentoft
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
L. Hounsgaard
Affiliation:
Research Unit of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Cognitive Adaptation Training Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT) is a treatment that circumvents cognitive impairments by rearranging the environment to support, prompt and sequence appropriate behaviours. CAT has shown promising results, including improved social functioning. As yet, no reports have appeared on the use of CAT in combination with Assertive Community Treatment (ACT).

Aim

To evaluate the effect of CAT in comparison with ACT, focusing on social functions (primary outcome), symptoms, readmission, and quality of life of outpatients with schizophrenia.

Objectives

To conduct a randomised clinical trial to test the effect of CAT compared to ACT on primary and secondary outcome.

Methods

From January 2009 to September 2010, 62 patients from three early intervention centres (where ACT was a principal part of the treatment) were enrolled in a randomised clinical trial. The effect of CAT was assessed at six and nine months.

Results

The results indicated no significant difference between intervention group and control group at six and nine months for any outcome. The results indicated no significant difference on primary outcome GAF-F at six months (p= 0.32) or nine months (p= 0.34).

Conclusions

The results from this trial differ from previous CAT trials; this is the first trial without significant results in comparison with treatment as usual. However, the low number of patients in the trial may have resulted in accepting a false null hypothesis, giving a type II error. Further studies are needed to determine if some elements from CAT can make ACT more economically effective.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.