Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T21:52:24.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rationality and risk-taking in Russia’s first Chechen War: toward a theory of cognitive realism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2010

Jason J. Morrissette
Jason J. Morrissette*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA
*
* E-mail: morrissette@marshall.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article seeks to establish a better scholarly understanding of former Russian President Boris Yeltsin’s decision to launch an ill-planned, risky, and ultimately disastrous invasion of the breakaway republic of Chechnya in 1994. Examining the decision-making environment that led up to the invasion, I conclude that while neorealism provides an adequate explanation for Yeltsin’s motives in this case, the decisions that he made in pursuit of these goals do not reflect the logic of rational utility maximization commonly associated with neorealist theory. Instead, I suggest that prospect theory – based on the idea that decision-makers tend to be risk averse when confronted with choices between gains while risk acceptant when confronted with losses – offers significantly more explanatory insight in this case. Thus, the article offers further support for an alternative theoretical approach to international relations that some scholars have termed ‘cognitive realism’, incorporating neorealist motives with a more empirically accurate perspective on the decision-making processes undertaken in pursuit of these motives.

Keywords

Chechen Warrealismprospect theoryYeltsinRussia
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , July 2010 , pp. 187 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, G. (1971), Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Ashley, R.K. (1984), ‘The poverty of neorealism’, International Organization 38(2): 225–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashour, O. (2004), ‘Security, oil, and internal politics: the causes of the Russo–Chechen conflicts’, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 27(2): 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baev, P.K. (2006), ‘Thucydides’ three security dilemmas in post-Soviet Strife’, Journal of Military Ethics 5(4): 334–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, D.A. (ed.) (1993), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Baron, R.S. (2005), ‘So right it’s wrong: groupthink and the ubiquitous nature of polarized group decision making’, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 37: 219–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berejikian, J.D. (2002), ‘A cognitive theory of deterrence’, Journal of Peace Research 39(2): 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berejikian, J.D. (2004), International Relations Under Risk: Framing State Choice, Albany, NY: University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bershidsky, L. (1994), ‘For Yeltsin, Chechnya holds key to future’, The Moscow Times, 30 December.Google Scholar
Bowker, M. (1997), Russian Foreign Policy and the End of the Cold War, Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Breslauer, G.W. (2002), Gorbachev and Yeltsin as Leaders, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, S.E. (2001), Small Nations and Great Powers: A Study of Ethnopolitical Conflict in the Caucasus, Richmond, VA: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
de Waal, T. (1994), ‘Decision to march: Yeltsin’s Rubicon’, The Moscow Times, 15 December.Google Scholar
Druckman, J.McDermott, R. (2008), ‘Emotion and the framing of risky choice’, Political Behavior 30: 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, J.B. (1998), Russia Confronts Chechnya: Roots of a Separatist Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elletson, H. (1998), The General Against the Kremlin, Alexander Lebed: Power and Illusion, London: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Evangelista, M. (2002), The Chechen Wars: Will Russia Go the Way of the Soviet Union?, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Farnham, B. (1992), ‘Roosevelt and the Munich crisis: insights from prospect theory’, Political Psychology 13(2): 205–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, J. (1995), ‘Rationalist explanations for war’, International Organization 49(3): 379–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, P. (1994), ‘Russia threatens a splinter state’, Christian Science Monitor, 30 November.Google Scholar
Ford, P. (1995), ‘When Russia’s hard-liners speak, Yeltsin listens’, Christian Science Monitor, 30 January.Google Scholar
Ford, P. (1997), ‘The view from the Kremlin: Russia as eternal superpower’, Christian Science Monitor, 29 May.Google Scholar
Gaidar, Y. (1999), Days of Defeat and Victory (translated from Russian by Jane Ann Miller), Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Gall, C.de Waal, T. (1998), Chechnya: Calamity in the Caucasus, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, C. (1994), ‘Chechnya invasion puts Yeltsin in harm’s way’, Los Angeles Times, 12 December.Google Scholar
Goldman, M.F. (1999), Russia, the Eurasian Republics, and Central/Eastern Europe, Dushkin: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Grieco, J.M. (1995), ‘Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism’, in C.W. Kegley, Jr (ed.), Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge, New York: St Martin’s Press, pp. 151–171.Google Scholar
Haas, M.L. (2001), ‘Prospect theory and the cuban missile crisis’, International Studies Quarterly 45(2): 241–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ITAR-TASS (1995), ‘Yeltsin criticizes military for “Chechen Anomaly”’. 17 February.Google Scholar
Janis, I.L. (1973), Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Jasinski, M., Berejikian, J. (2009), ‘Domestic and foreign influences on issue framing under prospect theory’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, 67th Annual National Conference, Chicago, IL, 2 April 2009. Retrieved 15 February 2009 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p361705_index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D.Tversky, A. (1979), ‘Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk’, Econometrica XLVII: 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, R. (ed.) (1986), ‘Realism, neorealism, and the study of world politics’, in Neorealism and its Critics, New York: Columbia University, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Kipp, J.W. (2003), ‘Putin and Russia’s wars in Chechnya’, in D.R. Herspring (ed.), Putin’s Russia: Past Imperfect, Future Uncertain, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 177–202.Google Scholar
Lapidus, G.W. (1998), ‘Contested sovereignty: the tragedy of Chechnya’, International Security 23(1): 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebed, A. (1997), My Life and My Country, Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.Google Scholar
Levy, J.S. (1997a), ‘Prospect theory and international relations: theoretical applications and analytical problems’, Political Psychology 13(2): 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, J.S. (1997b), ‘Prospect theory, rational choice, and international relations’, International Studies Quarterly 41(1): 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieven, A. (1998), Chechnya: Tombstone of Russian Power, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, A. (2001), ‘The realism of Russia’s foreign policy’, Europe–Asia Studies 53(1): 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, D. (2004), ‘Support and non-support for nationalist rebellion: a prospect theory approach’, Political Psychology 25(5): 703–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, R. (1998), Risk-Taking in International Politics: Prospect Theory in American Foreign Policy, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, R. (2004), ‘Prospect theory in political science: gains and losses from the first decade’, Political Psychology 25(2): 289–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, R.Kugler, J. (2001), ‘The decision to launch the gulf war: comparing expected utility and prospect theory models’, Journal of Strategic Studies 24: 49–85.Google Scholar
McInerney, A. (1992), ‘Prospect theory and soviet policy towards Syria, 1966–1967’, Political Psychology 13(2): 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. (1994), ‘The false promise of international institutions’, International Security 19(3): 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. (2009), ‘Anarchy and the struggle for power’, in R. Art and R. Jervis (eds), International Politics, New York: Pearson/Longman, pp. 50–60.Google Scholar
New York Times Editorial Board (1994), ‘Miscalculation in Chechnya’, The New York Times, 28 December.Google Scholar
O’Ballance, E. (1997), Wars in the Caucasus: 1990–1995, New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Official Kremlin International News Broadcast (1995), ‘The shame is that the army was DRAWN into this adventure: interview with Lieutenant General Leonid Ivashev’. January 5.Google Scholar
Peuch, J. (2004), ‘Chechnya: ten years after – the logic behind the first Chechen War’, Radio Free Europe. Retrieved 10 December from http://www.rferl.org/content/Article/1056335.htmlGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R.D. (1988), ‘Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games’, International Organization 42: 427–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russian Center for Public Opinion Research (VCIOM) (1994), ‘What marks on a scale of 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest) do you give to the performance of Boris Yeltsin?’. Retrieved 15 February 2009 from http://www.russiavotes.orgGoogle Scholar
Jr.Schaub, G. (2004), ‘Deterrence, compellence, and prospect theory’, Political Psychology 25(3): 389–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seely, R. (2001), Russo–Chechen Conflict, 1800–2000: A Deadly Embrace, London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Shevtsova, L. (1999), Yeltsin’s Russia: Myths and Reality, Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Sirén, P. (1998), ‘The battle for Grozny: the Russian invasion of Chechnia, December 1994–December 1996’, in B. Fowkes (ed.), Russia and Chechnia: The Permanent Crisis (Essays on Russo-Chechen Relations), New York: St Martin’s Press, pp. 87–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloane, W. (1995), ‘In Tightrope Act, Yeltsin justifies war, assures West’, Christian Science Monitor, 17 February.Google Scholar
Specter, M. (1995), ‘For Russia’s troops, humbling days’, The New York Times, 8 January.Google Scholar
Stein, J.G. (1993), ‘International cooperation and loss avoidance: framing the problem’, in J.G. Stein and L. W. Pauly (eds), Choosing to Cooperate: How States Avoid Loss, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins, pp. 2–34.Google Scholar
Taliaferro, J.W. (1997), ‘Cognitive realism: risk taking and the psychology of loss aversion in foreign policy’. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Taliaferro, J.W. (1998), ‘Quagmires in the Periphery: foreign wars and escalating commitment in international conflict’, Security Studies 7(3): 94–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taliaferro, J.W. (2004), ‘Power politics and the balance of risk: hypotheses on great power intervention in the periphery’, Political Psychology 25(2): 177–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walt, S. (1999), ‘Rigor or rigor mortis? Rational choice and security studies’, International Security 23(4): 5–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, K. (1965), Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis, New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Waltz, K. (1979), Theory of International Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Yeltsin, B. (2000), Midnight Diaries (translated from Russian by Catherine A. Fitzpatrick), New York: Perseus Books Group.Google Scholar