Abramson, P.R., Aldrich, J.H. and Rohde, D.W. (1987), ‘Progressive ambition among United States senators: 1972–1988’, Journal of Politics
André, A., Freire, A. and Papp, Z. (2014), ‘Electoral rules and legislators’ personal vote-seeking’, in K. Deschouwer and S. Depauw (eds), Representing the People. A Survey Among Members of Statewide and Substate Parliaments, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 87–109.
Bernauer, J. and Bräuninger, T. (2009), ‘Intra-party preference heterogeneity and faction membership in the 15th German bundestag: a computational text analysis of parliamentary speeches’, German Politics
Cain, B., Ferejohn, J. and Fiorina, M.P. (1987), The Personal Vote. Constituency Service and Electoral Independence, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Carey, J.M. (2007), ‘Competing principals, political institutions, and party unity in legislative voting’, American Journal of Political Science
Carey, J.M. and Shugart, M.S. (1995), ‘Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: a rank ordering of electoral formulas’, Electoral Studies
Cox, W.G., Rosenbluth, F.M. and Thies, M.F. (2000), ‘Electoral rules, career ambitions, and party structure: comparing factions in Japan’s upper and lower houses’, American Journal of Political Science
Dalton, R.J. and Wattenberg, M.P. (eds) (2000), Parties without Partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Debus, M. and Bäck, H. (2014), ‘Der Einfluss von Mandatstyp und Wahlkreiseigenschaften auf die inhaltlichen Positionen in Parlamentsreden. Eine Untersuchung anhand der parlamentarischen Debatten im Deutschen Bundestag von 1998 bis 2002’, Swiss Political Science Review
Deschouwer, K. and Depauw, S. (eds) (2014), Representing the People. A Survey Among Members of Statewide and Substate Parliaments, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deschouwer, K., Depauw, S. and André, A. (2014), ‘Representing the people in parliaments’, in K. Deschouwer and S. Depauw (eds), Representing the People. A Survey Among Members of Statewide and Sub-state Parliaments, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–18.
Döring, H. and Manow, P. (2012), Parliament and government composition database (ParlGov): An Infrastructure for Empirical Information on Parties, Elections and Governments in Modern Democracies, Version 12/10: parlgov.org (accessed January 15, 2013).
Downs, A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper & Row.
Epstein, D., Brady, D., Kawato, S. and O’Halloran, S. (1997), ‘A comparative approach to legislative organization: careerism and seniority in the United States and Japan’, American Journal of Political Science
Gelman, A. and Hill, J. (2007), Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel Hierarchical Models, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giannetti, D. and Benoit, K. (eds) (2009), Intra-party Politics and Coalition Governments, London: Routledge.
Hazan, R.Y. and Rahat, G. (2010), Democracy Within Parties. Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heller, W.B. and Mershon, C. (eds) (2009), Political Parties and Legislative Party Switching, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Herrick, R. and Moore, M.K. (1993), ‘Political ambition’s effect on legislative behavior: Schlesinger’s typology reconsidered and revised’, Journal of Politics
Hibbing, J.R. (1986), ‘Ambition in the house: behavioral consequences of higher office goals among U.S. representatives’, American Journal of Political Science
Kam, C.J. (2009), Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karvonen, L. (2010), The Personalisation of Politics. A Study of Parliamentary Democracies, Colchester: ECPR Press.
Maestas, C. (2003), ‘The incentives to listen: progressive ambition, resources, and opinion monitoring among state legislators’, Journal of Politics
Maestas, C.D., Fulton, S., Maisel, L.S. and Stone, W.J. (2006), ‘When to risk it? Institutions, ambitions, and the decision to run for the U.S. House’, American Political Science Review
Martin, S. (2010), ‘Electoral rewards for personal vote cultivation under PR-STV’, West European Politics
Martin, S. (2014), ‘Why electoral systems don’t always matter: the impact of “mega-seats” on legislative behavior in Ireland’, Party Politics
Mayhew, D.R. (1974), Congress. The Electoral Connection, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Meserve, S.A., Pemstein, D. and Bernhard, W.T. (2009), ‘Political ambition and legislative behavior in the European Parliament’, Journal of Politics
Micozzi, J.P. (2014), ‘Alliance for progress? Multilevel ambition and patterns of cosponsorship in the Argentine House’, Comparative Political Studies
Müller, W.C. (2000), ‘Political parties in parliamentary democracies. Making delegation and accountability work’, European Journal of Political Research
Müller, W.C. and Strøm, K. (eds) (1999), Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, P. (ed.) (1997), Passages to Power. Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Brian, D.Z. and Shomer, Y. (2013), ‘A cross-national analysis of party switching’, Legislative Studies Quarterly
Ozbudun, E. (1970), ‘Party cohesion in western democracies: a causal analysis’, Sage Professional Papers in Comparative Politics
Poguntke, T. and Webb, P.D. (eds) (2005), The Presidentialization of Politics. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Proksch, S. and Slapin, J.B. (2012), ‘Institutional foundations of legislative speech’, American Journal of Political Science
Riker, W.H. (1962), The Theory of Political Coalitions, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rohde, D.W. (1979), ‘Risk-bearing and progressive ambition: the case of members of the United States house of representatives’, American Journal of Political Science
Saalfeld, T. and Strøm, K.W. (2014), ‘Political parties and legislators’, in S. Martin, T. Saalfeld and K.W. Strøm (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 371–398.
Samuels, D. (2003), Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schlesinger, J.A. (1966), Ambition and Politics. Political Careers in the United States, Chicago: Rand McNally.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper & Brothers.
Searing, D.D. (1994), Westminster's World. Understanding Political Roles, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Shomer, Y. (2014), ‘What affects candidate selection processes? A cross-national examination’, Party Politics
Sieberer, U. (2006), ‘Party unity in parliamentary democracies: a comparative analysis’, Journal of Legislative Studies
Sieberer, U. (2010), ‘Behavioral consequences of mixed electoral systems: deviating voting behavior of district and list MPs in the german bundestag’, Electoral Studies
Sieberer, U. (2015), ‘Using MP statements to explain voting behavior in the German bundestag: an individual level test of the competing principals theory’, Party Politics
Stratmann, T. and Baur, M. (2002), ‘Plurality rule, proportional representation, and the German Bundestag: how incentives to pork-barrel differ across electoral systems’, American Journal of Political Science
Strøm, K. (1990), ‘A behavioral theory of competitive political parties’, American Journal of Political Science
Strøm, K. (1997), ‘Rules, reasons, and routines: legislative roles in parliamentary democracies’, Journal of Legislative Studies
Treul, S.A. (2009), ‘Ambition and party loyalty in the U.S. Senate’, American Politics Research
Van der Slik, J.R. and Pernacciaro, S.J. (1979), ‘Office ambitions and voting behavior in the U.S. Senate’, American Politics Quarterly
Victor, J.N. (2011), ‘Legislating versus campaigning: the legislative behavior of higher office-seekers’, American Politics Research
Zittel, T. and Gschwend, T. (2008), ‘Individualised constituency campaigns in mixed-member electoral systems. Candidates in the 2005 German elections’, West European Politics