Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T00:22:49.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Political Orientation of Agrarian Classes: a theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Carlo Geneletti
Get access

Extract

Inrecent times sociologists of different intellectual orientation and academic specialization have demonstrated a renewed interest in agrarian matters. If any, because the peasants still constitute a large section of the world population, this interest must be commended. In this paper, I will deal with a subject that is at present rather left aside: the political orientation of agrarian classes: it is a theoretical effort to evaluate the relations existing between landownership and political orientation. I will try to answer this question: ‘Once agrarian classes have been defined according to their access to land, which is their relative political orientation?’

Type
Structure and Interest
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , May 1976 , pp. 54 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alavi, Hamza, Peasants and Revolution, in Miliband, and Seville, (eds.), The Socialist Register 1965 (London, Merlin Press, 1965), pp. 241–277.Google Scholar
Alberti, Giorgo, The Breakdown of Provincial Urban Power Structure and the Rise of Peasant Movements, Land Tenure Center Reprint (Madison, University of Wisconsin, 1973).Google Scholar
Allardt, Erick, Types of Protest, in Zorno, Piz (ed.), Political Sociology (Baltimore, Penguin Press, 1971), pp. 273–290.Google Scholar
Ayrout, Henri, The Egyptian Peasant (Boston, Beacon Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Barrington, Moore J., The Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (Boston, Beacon Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard, Max Weber. An intellectual portrait (New York, Anchor Books, 1962).Google Scholar
Blanco, Hugo, Land or Death. The peasant struggle in Peru (New York, Pathfinder Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Brinton, Crane, The Anatomy of Revolution (New York, Vintage Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Centers, Richard, The Psychology of Social Classes. A study of class consciousness (New York, Russel & Russel, 1961).Google Scholar
Chayanov, A.V., The Theory of Peasant Economy (Chicago, Irwin Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Davies, James, Toward a Theory of Revolution, in Lindenfeld, F. (ed.), Reader in Political Sociology (New York, Funk & Wagnalls, 1968), pp. 405–431.Google Scholar
Dogan, Mattei, La Stratificazione Sociale dei Suffragi, in Sfreaficoe, A. e Palombara, J. La, (eds.), Elezioni e Comportamento Politico in Italia (Milano, Edizioni di Comunita, 1963), pp. 475–494.Google Scholar
Faure, Marcel, Les ouvriers agricoles, in Fauvet, J. et Mendras, H. (eds.), Les paysans et la politique dans la France contemporaine (Paris, A. Colin, 1958), pp. 281–285.Google Scholar
Fauvet, Jacques, Le monde paysan et la politique, in Fauvet, J. et Mendras, H. (eds.), Les paysans et la politique dans la France contemporaine (Paris, A. Colin, 1958), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Feder, Ernest, Social Opposition to Peasant Movements and its Effects in Latin America, Studies in Comparative International Development, VI (1971), 159–189.Google Scholar
Forman, , Shepard, , Disunity and Discontent; a study of peasant political movements in Brazil, Journal of Latin American Studies, III (1971), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, J.H., The European Peasantry: The final phase (London, Methuen, 1969).Google Scholar
Furtado, Celso, Diagnosis of the Brazilian Crisis (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galeski, Boguslaw, Social Organization and Rural Social Change, pp. 119–137in Shanin, T. (ed.), Peasants and Peasant Societies (Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1971).Google Scholar
GaljartBenno, , Movilizacion Campesina en América Latina, Boletín de Estudios Latinoamericanos, XII (1972), 2–19.Google Scholar
Galli, G.and Prandi, F., Patterns of Political Participation in Italy (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Gilhodés, Pierre, Agrarian Struggles in Colombia, pp. 407–454in Stavenhagen, R. (ed.), Agrarian Problems and Peasant Movements in Latin America (New York, Anchor Books, 1970).Google Scholar
Gough, Kathleen, Peasant Resistance and Revolt in South India, Pacific Affairs, XLI (1968), 526–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, Everett, On the Theory of Social Change. How Economic Growth begins (Homswood, Ill., The Dorsey Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Hewitt, Cynthia, Brasil: The Peasant Movement of Pernambuco, 1961–1964, in Landsberger, H. (ed.), Latin American Peasant Movements (Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1969), pp. 374–398.Google Scholar
Hoffer, Eric, The True Believer (New York, Harper & Row, 1966).Google Scholar
Huizer, Gerrit, Emiliano Zapata and the Peasant Guerrillas in the Mexican Revolution, pp. 375–406in Stavenhagen, R., (ed.), Agrarian Problems and Peasant Movements in Latin America (New York, Anchor Books, 1970), pp. 375–406.Google Scholar
Huizer, Gerrit, The Revolutionary Potential of Peasants in Latin America (Lexington, Lexington Books, 1972).Google Scholar
Kautsky, Karl, La Questione Agraria (Milano, Feltrinelli, 1959).Google Scholar
Landsberger, Henry, The role of Peasant Movement and Revolts in Development, in Landsberger, H. (ed.), Latin American Peasant Movements (Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1969), pp. 1–61.Google Scholar
Landsberger, Henry, The Problems of Peasant Wars, Comparative Studies in Society and History, XV (1973), 378–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Georges, The Coming of the French Revolution (New York, Vintage, 1949).Google Scholar
Lehmann, David, Peasant Consciousness and Agrarian Reform in Chile, Archives européennes de sociologie, XIII (1972), 297–325.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. Martin, Political Man (New YorkAnchor Books, 1963).Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, Capital. A critique of political economy (Chicago, Charles A. Ker, 1909).Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (New York, International Publishers, 1926).Google Scholar
Merton, Robert, Social Theory and Social Structure (New York, Free Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Mitrany, David, Marx Against the Peasants (Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Moraes, Clodomir, Peasant Leagues in Brasil, in Stavenhagen, R. (ed.), Agrarian Problems and Peasant Movements in Latin America (New York, Anchor Books, 1970), pp. 453–502.Google Scholar
Mousnier, Roland, Peasant Uprisings in Seventeenth Century France, Russia, and China (New York, Harper Torchbooks 1970).Google Scholar
Petras, I. and Zeitlin, M., Agrarian Radicalism in Chile, in Stavenhagen, R., op. cit. pp. 503–532.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro, On the Logic of Post Factum Explanations: the hypothesis of lower class frustration as the cause of Leftist Radicalism, Social Forces, LIII (1971). 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postan, M. M., Fact and Relevance (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanin, Teodor, Peasantry as a Political Factor, in Shanin, T. (ed.), Peasants and Peasant Societies (Baltimore, Penguin Books, 1971), pp. 238–264.Google Scholar
Siegfred, André, The Influence of the Régime of Landed Property on the Formation of Political Opinion, in Sorokin, P., Zimmermann, C. and Galpin, C. (eds.), A Systematic Sourcebook in Rural Sociology (Minneapolis, The University of Minnesota Press, 1932), pp. 402–408.Google Scholar
Singelmann, Peter, Campesin Movements Class Conflict in Latin America: the functions of exchange power, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Sociological Association in San Antonio, Texas, 03 1972.Google Scholar
Singelmann, Peter, The Closing Triangle: critical notes on a model for peasant mobilization in Latin America (unpublished paper).Google Scholar
Sorokin, P., Zimmermann, C. and Galpin, C., A Systematic Sourcebook in Rural Sociology (Minneapolis, The University of Minnesota Press, 1932).Google Scholar
Sterling, Paul, A Turkish Village, pp. 37–48in Shanin, T. (ed.), Peasants and Peasant Societies (Baltimore, Penguin Books, 1971). pp. 37–48.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney, Peasant Communism in Southern Italy (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Thomas, W.I., and Znaniecki, F., The Polish Peasant in Europe and America (New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 1927).Google Scholar
Toch, Hans, The Social Psychology of Social Movements (Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merril Company, 1965).Google Scholar
Tomasevich, Jozo, Peosants, Politics, and Economic Change in Yugoslavia (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1955).Google Scholar
Urzua, Raül, La Demanda Campesina (Santiago, Ediciones NuevaUniversidad, 1969).Google Scholar
Villari, Pasquale, Il Mezzogiorno e la Questione Sociale, in Villari, R. (ed.), Il Sud nella Storia d'ltalia. Antologia della questione meridionole (Bari, Laterza, 1971), pp. 105–117.Google Scholar
Wertheim, W.F., Evolution and Revolution (Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1974).Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric, José, San, Subcultures of a ‘Traditional’ Coffee Municipality, in Steward, J.H. et al. (eds.), The People of Puerto Rico (Chicago, The University of Illinois Press, 1956), pp. 190–203.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric, The Sons of the Shaking Earth (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric, Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century (New York, Harper & Row, 1969).Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric, On Peasant Rebellions, op. cit. pp. 264–274.Google Scholar
Zagoria, Donald, The Ecology of Peasant Communism in India, American Political Science Review, II (1971), 144–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar