Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T23:32:59.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of somatosensory evoked potentials in detecting cerebral ischaemia during carotid endarterectomy

An assessment of its validity under regional anaesthesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2008

S. Fielmuth  and
T. Uhlig
S. Fielmuth*
Affiliation:
Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, St. Louis, MO, USA Dietrich-Bonhoeffer-Klinikum, Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Neubrandenburg, Germany
T. Uhlig
Affiliation:
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria Klinikum Luedenscheid, Zentrum fuer Anaesthesie und Intensivmedizin, Germany
*
Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8054, 660 S. Euclid, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. E-mail: fielmuts@msnotes.wustl.edu; Tel: +314 362 1355; Fax: +314 747 1070
Get access

Summary

Background and objective

The generation of shunt criteria by somatosensory evoked potentials is controversial. This study was designed to validate somatosensory evoked potentials’ tracings and their derived shunt criteria compared with clinical-neurological examination.

Methods

We prospectively studied the somatosensory evoked potentials’ tracing in 102 patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy under cervical plexus blockade, comparing different somatosensory evoked potentials’ derived thresholds of impaired cerebral blood flow with the neurological examination.

Results

The 50% reduction of the primary cortical response to median nerve stimulation as threshold of critical cerebral blood flow showed a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 66%. In case of total collapse of primary cortical response, we observed a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 89%. Concerning the prolongation of central conduction time between the spinal response at N13 and the cortical response at N20/P25 as critical threshold of impaired cerebral blood flow, the sensitivity was 87% and specificity 40%. The need-to-shunt index with its threshold at >0.5 showed a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 88%.

Conclusion

Compared to other studies, we have shown a much lower sensitivity and specificity of somatosensory evoked potentials in detecting critical cerebral perfusion; thus its use remains controversial and has to be assessed in further investigations.

Keywords

SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED POTENTIALSCAROTID STENOSISCERVICAL PLEXUSANAESTHESIA CONDUCTIONSURGERY
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 25 , Issue 8 , August 2008 , pp. 648 - 656
Copyright
Copyright © European Society of Anaesthesiology 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Gumerlock, MK, Neuwelt, EA. Carotid endarterectomy: to shunt or not to shunt. Stroke 1988; 19: 1485–1490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Cheng, MA, Theard, MA, Tempelhoff, R. Anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: a survey. J Neurosurg Anaesthesiol 1997; 9: 211–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Beese, U, Langer, H, Lang, W, Dinkel, M. Comparison of near-infrared spectroscopy and somatosensory evoked potentials for the detection of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 1998; 29: 2032–2037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Dinkel, M. Stellenwert des EP-monitorings für die Gefäßchirurgie. Anaesthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 1997; 32 (Suppl. 2): 215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Kochs, E. Zerebrales monitoring. Anaesthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 1991; 26: 363–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Dinkel, M, Kamp, H-D, Schweiger, H. Somatosensorisch evozierte potentiale in der karotischirurgie. Anaesthesist 1991; 40: 72–78.Google Scholar
7.Gigli, GL, Caramia, M, Marciani, MG, Zarola, F, Lavaroni, F, Rossini, PM. Monitoring of subcortical and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy: comparison with stump pressure levels. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987; 68: 424–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Haupt, WF, Horsch, S. Evoked potential monitoring in carotid surgery: a review of 994 cases. Neurology (Minneap.) 1992; 42: 835–838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.JrKearse, LA, Brown, EN, McPeck, K. Somatosensory evoked potentials sensitivity relative to electroencephalography for cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 1992; 23: 498–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Lam, AM, Manninen, PH, Ferguson, GG, Nantau, W. Monitoring electrophysiological function during carotid endarterectomy: a comparison of somatosensory evoked potentials and conventional electroencephalogram. Anaesthesiology 1991; 75: 15–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Markand, ON, Warren, CH, Moorthy, SS, Dilley, R. Monitoring of somatosensory evoked responses during carotid endarterectomy. Arch Neurol 1984; 41: 375–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Pozzessere, G, Valle, E, Santaro, A, Delfini, R. Prognostic value of early somatosensory evoked potentials during carotid surgery: relationship with electroencephalogram, stump pressure and clinical outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1987; 89: 28–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Russ, W, Fraedrich, G, Hehrlein, FW, Hempelmann, G. Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials as a prognostic factor of neurologic state after carotid endarterectomy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 33: 392–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Fava, E, Bortolani, E, Ducati, A, Shieppati, M. Role of SEP in identifying patients requiring temporary shunt during carotid endarterectomy. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 84: 426–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Moore, DC. Regional block. A handbook for use in the clinical practice of medicine and surgery, 4th edn. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1978: 112–22.Google Scholar
16.Moore, WS, Barnett, HJM, Beebe, HG et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation 1995; 91: 566–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trila Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid disease. New Engl J Med 1991; 325: 445–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Shapiro, HM, Aidinis, SJ. Neurosurgical anesthesia. Surg Clin North Am 1975; 55: 913–928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Sbarigia, E, Shioppa, A, Misuraca, M. Somatosensory evoked potentials versus locoregional anaesthesia in the monitoring of cerebral function during carotid artery surgery: preliminary results of a prospective study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2001; 21: 413–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Haupt, WF, Erasmi-Körber, H, Lanfermann, H. Intraoperative recording of parietal SEP can miss hemodynamic infarction during carotid endarterectomy: a case study. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 92: 86–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Erasmi, H, Walter, M, Löhr, G. Läßt sich die sicherheit des SEP-monitorings während der carotis-chirurgie verbessern? Langenbecks Arch Chir 1997; 114 (Suppl. II): 1293–1294.Google Scholar
22.Mayer, RC, Bingley, J, Westcott, MJ et al. Intraoperative neurological changes in 1665 regional anaesthetic carotid endarterectomies predicts postoperative stroke. ANZ J Surg 2007; 77: 49–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Ackerstaff, RG, van de Vlassakker, JW. Monitoring of brain function during carotid endarterectomy: an analysis of contemporary methods. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1998; 12: 341–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.De Vleeschauer, P, Horsch, S, Matamaros, R. Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials in carotid surgery: results, usefulness and limitations of the method. Ann Vasc Surg 1988; 2: 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Holland, NR. Subcortical strokes from intracranial aneurysm surgery: implications for intraoperative neuromonitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 15: 439–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Wöber, C, Zeitlhofer, J, Asenbaum, S et al. Monitoring of median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials in carotid surgery. J Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 15: 429–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed