Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Comparative evaluation of the prolonged use of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing anaesthetized patients

  • G. S. Voyagis (a1), V. K. Dimitriou (a1) and K. P. Kyriakis (a1)

Abstract

The cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) was compared with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with respect to airway quality and respiratory adverse events in 140 spontaneously breathing patients undergoing procedures of duration more than 1 h. Patients were allocated randomly to receive either a COPA (n=72) or a LMA (n=68) for airway management during anaesthesia induced with propofol and maintained with sevoflurane, nitrous oxide and oxygen. Groups were similar when comparing the first-time successful insertion rates (COPA: 94.5%, LMA: 95.6%), but airway manipulations (head tilt, chin lift, jaw thrust) were reported more frequently in the COPA group, 27.8% vs. LMA, 4.4%; P=0.0005. During the post-induction apnoeic period, all patients were ventilated manually and although, mean (SD) leak pressure was lower in the COPA group (18 (4) cm H2O vs. LMA, 22 (3) cm H2O; P< 0.0001), the tidal volumes achieved did not differ in both groups: COPA, 9.5 (4) mL kg−1 vs. LMA, 10.5 (4.5) mL kg−1. The incidences of intra-operative coughing, gagging, laryngospasm, oxygen desaturation and hypercarbia were similar in both groups. Although both devices are equivalent with respect to the overall respiratory problems during spontaneous breathing anaesthesia of intermediate or prolonged duration, the LMA was associated with fewer airway quality problems, suggesting that it is more efficacious in securing the airway.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence: G. S. Voyagis, 19, Kallistratou Str., GR-157 72 Athens, Greece.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Comparative evaluation of the prolonged use of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing anaesthetized patients

  • G. S. Voyagis (a1), V. K. Dimitriou (a1) and K. P. Kyriakis (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.