Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

QT interval and QT dispersion during the induction of anaesthesia in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage: a comparison of thiopental and propofol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

P. E. Tanskanen
Affiliation:
Töölö Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia, Helsinki, Finland
J. V. Kyttä
Affiliation:
Töölö Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia, Helsinki, Finland
T. T. Randell
Affiliation:
Töölö Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia, Helsinki, Finland
Get access

Abstract

Background and objective: Thiopental prolongs the QT interval more than propofol, and the two induction agents were compared in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage predisposed to electrocardiographic abnormalities and cardiac dysrhythmias.

Methods: Twenty-nine patients were studied randomly. Anaesthesia was induced with either thiopental or propofol and fentanyl; vecuronium was used as a neuromuscular blocking agent. The electrocardiogram and arterial blood pressure were monitored from before the induction of anaesthesia to 2 min after endotracheal intubation.

Results: The median QT interval was at baseline 423 ms in the thiopental group and at 432 ms in the propofol group, and it increased in the thiopental group to 446 ms and decreased in the propofol group to 425 ms (P < 0.01 between groups). After induction and endotracheal intubation, the number of patients with increased QT dispersion was greater in the propofol group (P < 0.05). The incidence of cardiac dysrhythmias was similar in the study groups.

Conclusions: Thiopental and propofol are equally suitable for the induction of anaesthesia in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2002 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 2 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-76cb886bbf-r88h9 Total loading time: 0.628 Render date: 2021-01-25T02:18:48.594Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

QT interval and QT dispersion during the induction of anaesthesia in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage: a comparison of thiopental and propofol
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

QT interval and QT dispersion during the induction of anaesthesia in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage: a comparison of thiopental and propofol
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

QT interval and QT dispersion during the induction of anaesthesia in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage: a comparison of thiopental and propofol
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *