Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:00:37.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low-flow anaesthesia with desflurane: kinetics during clinical procedures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

A. Johansson
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Lund, S-221 85, Sweden
D. Lundberg
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Lund, S-221 85, Sweden
H. H. Luttropp
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Lund, S-221 85, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Background and objective Low-flow anaesthesia is economical and less polluting. The purpose of this study was to determine the inspired and end-tidal desflurane concentrations during anaesthesia with a vaporizer setting maintained at 5%, during low-flow anaesthesia after 120 min with fresh gas inflows of 1.0 and 2.0 L min−1.

Methods The study was both prospective and randomized, including 56 patients (28 patients in each group) scheduled for elective surgery of an expected anaesthesia time of at least 120 min. Inspired and end-tidal concentrations of desflurane were measured during low-flow anaesthesia with fresh gas inflows of 1.0 and 2.0 L min−1. The vaporizer setting was fixed at 5% desflurane.

Results The inspired and end-tidal concentrations of desflurane in the 1.0 L min−1 group after 120 min were 4.54% vs. 4.37% (P < 0.001). In the 2.0 L min−1 group, the inspired and end-tidal concentrations of desflurane were 4.76% vs. 4.58% (P < 0.001). The estimated end-tidal/inspired ratios at 120 min of anaesthesia were 0.96 in both groups. At a fresh gas flow of 1.0 L min−1, the end-tidal concentration was 0.87 of the vaporizer setting. Increasing the fresh gas flow to 2.0 L min−1 increased the end-tidal value by 0.05.

Conclusion There is a significant difference between the inspired and end-tidal concentrations of desflurane when fresh gas inflows were 1.0 and 2.0 L min−1, but not for the ratio of inspired/end-tidal.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2001 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)