Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Understanding the EU-led ‘pandemic’ of constitutional foreign policy objectives - Joris Larik, Foreign Policy Objectives in European Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press2016), pp. 368.

  • Teresa Cabrita
  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Understanding the EU-led ‘pandemic’ of constitutional foreign policy objectives - Joris Larik, Foreign Policy Objectives in European Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press2016), pp. 368.
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Understanding the EU-led ‘pandemic’ of constitutional foreign policy objectives - Joris Larik, Foreign Policy Objectives in European Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press2016), pp. 368.
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Understanding the EU-led ‘pandemic’ of constitutional foreign policy objectives - Joris Larik, Foreign Policy Objectives in European Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press2016), pp. 368.
      Available formats
      ×

Abstract

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Footnotes

Hide All
*

PhD Researcher, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance (ACELG) and Amsterdam Centre for International Law (ACIL). Email: t.m.cabrita@uva.nl.

Footnotes

References

Hide All

1 J.-C. Juncker, ‘State of the Union 2018, The Hour of European Sovereignty. Authorised version of the State of the Union Address 2018’, <ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/state-union-speeches/state-union-2018_en>, visited 8 January 2019.

2 European Union External Action Service (EEAS), ‘Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy’, 28 June 2016, p. 10, <europa.eu/globalstrategy/en/shared-vision-common-action-stronger-europe>, visited 8 January 2019.

3 Art. 3(5) TEU.

4 Larik, J., Foreign Policy Objectives in European Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press 2016) p. 3 (citing W. Drescher, ‘Ziele und Zuständigkeiten’, in A. Marchetti and C. Demesmay (eds.), Der Vertrag von Lissabon: Analyse und Bewertung (Nomos 2010) p. 68).

5 Ibid., p. 3 (citing R. Barents, Het Verdrag van Lissabon: Achtergronden en Commentaar (Kluwer 2008) p. 181).

6 On the role of legal scholarship in supporting the ECJ’s narrative on the constitutional character of the EU legal order, see Horsley, T., The Court of Justice of the European Union as an Institutional Actor: Judicial Lawmaking and its Limits (Cambridge University Press 2018) p. 127-129 .

7 Larik, supra n. 4, p. 88 ff.

8 Ibid., p. 68.

9 Ibid., p. 46.

10 Ibid., p. 38.

11 Ibid.

12 Ibid., p. 53.

13 Ibid.

14 Ibid., p. 67.

15 Ibid., p. 89 (citing K.-P. Sommermann, Staatsziele und Staatszielbestimmungen (Mohr Siebeck 1997) p. 273).

16 Ibid., p. 59.

17 Ibid., p. 276.

18 Ibid., p. 55.

19 Art. 15(4) Constitution of the Russian Federation (1993).

20 Larik, supra n. 4, p. 18.

21 Ibid., p. 67.

22 Ibid., p. 123-124.

23 Hartley, T.C., European Union Law in a Global Context: Text, Cases and Materials (Cambridge University Press 2004) xv .

24 Larik, supra n. 4, p. 102-103; Art. 90 Constitution of the Kingdom of The Netherlands.

25 Ibid., p. 159.

26 Which are seen as aspects ‘immune to integration’ (integrationsfest), a term used by the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) in its Decision of 30 June 2009 (Lissabon), BVerfGE 123, p. 267, para. 239; Larik, supra n. 4, p. 175, 181.

27 Larik, supra n. 4, p. 170 ff.

28 ECJ 3 September 2008, Joined Cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P, Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council and Commission.

29 Larik, supra n. 4, p. 151.

30 See G. de Búrca, ‘Europe’s raison d’être’, in D. Kochenov and F. Amtenbrink (eds.), The European Union’s Shaping of the International Legal Order (Cambridge University Press 2014) p. 21-37.

31 A point that the author later revisits in Larik, J., ‘Pars Pro Toto: The Member States’ Obligations of Sincere Cooperation, Solidarity and Unity’ in M. Cremona (ed.), Structural Principles in EU External Relations Law (Hart Publishing 2018) p. 175199 .

32 Larik, supra n. 4, p. 177.

33 Ibid., p. 189; Cremona, M., ‘Coherence in European Foreign Relations Law’, in P. Koutrakos (ed.), European Foreign Policy: Legal and Political Perspectives (Edward Elgar 2011) p. 6061 ; Van Vooren, B., EU External Relations Law and the European Neighbourhood Policy: A Paradigm for Coherence (Routledge 2012) p. 5772 .

34 Larik, supra n. 4, p. 280.

35 Ibid., p. 198.

36 Ibid., p. 14.

* PhD Researcher, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance (ACELG) and Amsterdam Centre for International Law (ACIL). Email: .

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed