Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:29:50.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distributive Justice and International Trade*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2012

Ethan B. Kapstein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Public officials frequently assert that nations shape their own economic destiny. This statement implies that the international economy presents a level playing field for all participants. If the rules of globalization were somehow written in favor of certain countries, however, that would not be true, and the legitimacy of the economic system would be cast in doubt. This essay examines the structure of the international trade regime. Following John Rawls, it asserts that “justice is the first virtue of social institutions.” This leads to the question: Is the trade regime just?

The essay seeks to answer that question through both a theoretical and empirical exploration of the trading system. Building on the Rawlsian “original position,” it sketches the fundamental principles that would underlie such a regime. It then traces the history of North-South trade relations as a case study.

The essay concludes by suggesting that concerns with the trade regime's normative framework have played an important role in shaping its basic principles. But that does not mean that the regime is just. Greater transfers from North to South would be one of the major requirements of justice that currently are not being met

Type
Articles
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 13 , March 1999 , pp. 175 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For a classic statement of the utilitarian position with respect to trade theory, see Meade, James, The Theory of International Economic Policy, Trade And Welfare (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 5Google Scholar.

2 Cited in Hausman, Daniel M. and McPherson, Michael S., Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 95–96Google Scholar.

3 Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, (1971), p. 3Google Scholar.

4 Meade, , The Theory of International Economic Policy, Trade And Welfare, p. 5Google Scholar.

5 Beitz, Charles R., Political Theory and International Relations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979Google Scholar); and Pogge, Thomas W., Realizing Rawls (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989Google Scholar).

6 Krasner, Stephen D., Structural Conflict: The Third World against Global Liberalism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), p. 12Google Scholar.

7 Tsikata, Tsidi M., Aid Effectiveness: A Survey of the Recent Empirical Literature (Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 1998), p. 5Google Scholar.

8 Rodrik, Dani, What Does tbe Political Economy Literature on Trade Policy (Not) Tell Us That We Ought to Know? (Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1994), p. 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Hall, Peter A., “The Role of Interests, Institutions, and Ideas in the Comparative Political Economy of the Industrialized Nations,” in Lichbach, Mark Irving and Zuckerman, Alan S., eds., Comparative Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997), p. 195Google Scholar.

10 Mill, John Stuart, Principles of Political Economy (New book: Penguin 1970, orig. 1848), book II, chap. 1, p. 350Google Scholar.

11 For a review of utilitarian doctrine, see Ellis, Anthony, “Utilitarianism and International Ethics,” in Nardin, Terry. and Mapel, David R., eds., Traditions of International Ethics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992Google Scholar).

12 The example is drawn from Rescher, Nicholas, Distributive Justice (Pittsburgh: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966), p. 26Google Scholar.

13 Ball, Lawrence and Mankiw, N. Gregory, What Do Budget Deficits Do? (Harvard University, 1996, photocopy), p. 108Google Scholar.

14 Hausman, and McPherson, , Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy, p. 96Google Scholar.

15 Okun, Arthur, Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1973), pp. 91–95Google Scholar.

16 Nozick, Robert, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974Google Scholar).

17 Sen, Amartya, On Ethics and Economics (New York: Basil Blackwell, 1987), p. 32Google Scholar.

18 Rawls, , A Theory of Justice, p. 7Google Scholar.

19 Rawls, John, “The Law of Peoples,” in Shute, Stephen and Hurley, Susan, eds., On Human Rights (New York: Basic Books, 1993Google Scholar).

20 Rawls, , A Theory of Justice, p. 321Google Scholar.

21 Ibid., p. 60Google Scholar.

22 Ibid., p. 328Google Scholar.

23 Carr, Edward Hallett, The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (New York: Harper & Row, 1964), p. 146Google Scholar.

24 Hoffmann, Stanley, Duties Beyond Borders (Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 1981), p. 141Google Scholar.

25 Doyle, Michael W., Ways of War and Peace (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1997), pp. 422–23Google Scholar.

26 United Nations Development program, Human Development Report 1997 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997Google Scholar).

27 Doyle, , Ways of War and Peace, p. 423Google Scholar.

28 For an excellent recent overview, see Doyle, , Ways of War and Peace, pp. 423–36Google Scholar.

29 World Bank, World Development Report 1997 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. 12Google Scholar.

30 Summers, Lawrence H., “The Global Economic Situation and the United States' Approach” (United States Office of Public Affairs, October 1, 1998Google Scholar).

31 World Bank, World Development Report 1997Google Scholar.

32 World Bank, World Development Report 1990 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990), p. 126Google Scholar.

33 Krueger, Anne O., Trade Policies and Developing Nations (Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1995), p. 45Google Scholar.

34 Rawls, , A Theory of Justice, p. 14Google Scholar.

35 Axelrod, Robert M., The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books, 1984Google ScholarPubMed); and Ostrom, Elinor, Walker, James, and Gardner, Roy, “Covenants With and Without a Sword,” American Political Science Review 86 (June 1992), pp. 404–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 Cited in Irwin, Douglas A., An Intellectual History of Free Trade (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), p. 83Google Scholar.

37 Meade, , The Theory of International Economic Policy, Trade And Welfare, p. 282Google Scholar.

38 Ellis, , “Utilitarianism and International Ethics.”Google Scholar

39 Helleiner, G. K., The New Global Economy and the Developing Countries (Brookfield, Vt.: Edward Elgar, 1990), pp. 51–52Google Scholar.

40 Richardson, J. David, “The New Political Economy of Trade Policy,” in Krugman, Paul R., ed., Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1986), p. 272Google Scholar.

41 Ibid., p. 274Google Scholar.

42 Keohane, Robert O., “Reciprocity in International Relations,”International Organization 40, no. 1 (1986), p. 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Keohane, , “Reciprocity in International Relations,” p. 7Google Scholar.

44 Rawls, , A Theory of Justice, pp. 102–3Google Scholar.

45 on this point see Richardson, J. David, “Trade Policy,” in Feldstein, Martin, ed., International Economic Cooperation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988), p. 172Google Scholar.

46 Cited in Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977), p. 77CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Arndt, H. W., Essays in International Economics 1944–1994 (Brookfield, Vt.: Avebury, 1996), p. 303Google Scholar.

48 Finlayson, Jock A. and Zacher, Mark W., “The GATT and the Regulation of Trade Barriers: Regime Dynamics and Functions,” in Krasner, Stephen D., ed., International Regimes (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983), p. 287Google Scholar.

49 Richardson, , “The New Political Economy of Trade Policy,” p. 172Google Scholar.

50 Haggard, Stephan, Developing Nations and the Politics of Global Integration (Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1995Google Scholar). Haggard emphasizes the growing divisions within “South.”

51 Cited in Krueger, , Trade Policies and Developing Nations, p. 45Google Scholar.

52 Tsikata, , Aid Effectiveness, p. 5Google Scholar.

53 Krasner, Stephen D., Structural Conflict (Berkeley: University of California press, 1985Google Scholar).

54 Hoekman, Bernard and Kostecki, Michel, The Political Economy of the World Trading system: From GATT to WTO (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 27Google Scholar.

55 Cited in Srinivasan, T. N., Developing Countries and the Multilateral Trading System (Boulder: Westview Press, 1998), p. 21Google Scholar.

56 Lewis, John P., “Oil, Other Scarcities, and the Poor Countries,” World Politics 4(1974), p. 66Google Scholar.

57 Cited in Arndt, H. W., Economic Development: The History of an Idea (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987), p. 51Google Scholar.

58 Grimwade, Nigel, International Trade Policy: A Contemporary Analysis (New York: Routledge, 1996), pp. 152–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Arndt, , Economic Development, pp. 72–75Google Scholar; and Krueger, , Trade Policies and Developing Nations, pp. 7–8Google Scholar.

59 Meier, Gerald M., International Trade and Development (New York: Harper & Row, 1963), pp. 175ffGoogle Scholar.

60 Arndt, , Economic Development, p. 76Google Scholar.

61 Grimwade, , International Trade Policy, pp. 154–55Google Scholar; Arndt, , Economic Development, pp. 77–87Google Scholar.

62 Srinivasan, , Developing Countries and the Multilateral Trading System, p. 23Google Scholar; and Arndt, , Economic Development, pp. 77–78Google Scholar.

63 Arndt, , Economic Development, p. 78Google Scholar.

64 Dell, Sidney, “The Origins of UNCTAD,” in Cutajar, Michael Zammit ed., UNCTAD and the South-North Dialogue: The First Twenty Years (New York: Pergamon Press, 1985), pp. 10–26Google Scholar.

65 Krishnamurti, R., “UNCTAD as a Negotiating Instrument on Trade Policy: The UNCTAD-GATT Relationship,” in Cutajar, , ed., UNCTAD and the South-North Dialogue, pp. 46–48Google Scholar.

66 Arndt, , Economic Development, p. 78Google Scholar.

67 Grimwade, , International Trade Policy, p. 162Google Scholar.

68 Krueger, , Trade Policies and Developing Nations, p. 40Google Scholar.

69 Srinivasan, , Developing Countries and the Multilateral Trading System, p. 26Google Scholar.

70 Krueger, , Trade policies and Developing Nations, p. 40Google Scholar.

71 Ibid., p. 43Google Scholar.

72 Grimwade, , International Trade Policy, p. 166Google Scholar.

73 Haggard, , Developing Nations, p. 44Google Scholar.

74 World Trade Organization, “The Uruguay Round,” http://www.wto.org/wto/about/facts5.html (1994Google Scholar).

75 Harrison, Glenn W., Rutherford, Thomas F., and Tarr, David G., “Quantifying the Urguay Round,” in Martin, Will and Winters, L. Alan, eds., The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1995), p. 242Google Scholar.

76 Whalley, John and Hamilton, Colleen, The Trading System after the Uruguay Round (Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 1998), pp. 62–63Google Scholar.

77 World Trade Organization, “The Uruguay Round,” p. 6Google Scholar.

78 Cited in Krueger, , Trade Policies and Developing Nations, p. 105Google Scholar.

79 Cited in ibid., p. 107Google Scholar.

80 Grimwade, , International Trade Policy, p. 189Google Scholar.

81 Hoekman, Bernard and Kostecki, Michel, The Political Economy of the World Trading System, p. 241Google Scholar.

82 “ Survey of World Trade ,” The Economist , October 3, 1998, pp. 37 – 38Google Scholar.

83 For a good overview, see Anderson, Kym, “The Entwining of Trade Policy,” in Martin, Will L. and Alan Winters, L., eds., The Uruguay Round and the Developing Economics, pp. 435–56Google Scholar.