Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T21:49:14.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commutator length of annulus diffeomorphisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2012

E. MILITON
E. MILITON*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Mathématiques d’Orsay, UMR 8628, Bât. 425, Faculté des Sciences d’Orsay, Université Paris-Sud XI, F-91405 Orsay cedex, France (email: emmanuel.militon@math.u-psud.fr)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the group Diffr0(𝔸) of Cr-diffeomorphisms of the closed annulus that are isotopic to the identity. We show that, for r≠2,3, the linear space of homogeneous quasi-morphisms on the group Diffr0(𝔸) is one-dimensional. Therefore, the commutator length on this group is (stably) unbounded. In particular, this provides an example of a manifold whose diffeomorphism group is unbounded in the sense of Burago, Ivanov and Polterovich.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 919 - 937
Copyright
©2012 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Abe, K. and Fukui, K.. Commutators of C1-diffeomorphisms preserving a submanifold. J. Math. Soc. Japan 61 (2009), 427–436.Google Scholar
[2]Anderson, R. D.. The algebraic simplicity of certain groups of homeomorphisms. Amer. J. Math. 80(4) (Oct. 1958), 955–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bavard, C.. Longueur stable des commutateurs. Enseign. Math (2) 37(1–2) (1991), 109–150.Google Scholar
[4]Bounemoura, A.. Simplicité des groupes de transformations de surface (Ensaios Matematicos, 14). Sociedade Brasileira de Matematica, Rio de Janeiro, 2008, pp. 1–143.Google Scholar
[5]Burago, D., Ivanov, S. and Polterovich, L.. Conjugation-invariant norms on groups of geometric origin. Groups of diffeomorphisms: In Honor of Shigeyuki Morita on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday (Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics, 52). Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 2008.Google Scholar
[6]Calegari, D.. scl (Mathematical Society of Japan Memoirs, 20). Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Ghys, E.. Groups acting on the circle. Enseign. Math. (2) 47 (2001), 329–407.Google Scholar
[8]Eisenbud, D., Hirsch, U. and Neumann, W.. Transverse foliations of Seifert bundles and self-homeomorphisms of the circle. Comment. Math. Helv. 56 (1981), 638–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Entov, M., Polterovich, L. and Py, P.. On continuity of quasi-morphisms for symplectic maps. Perspectives in Analysis, Geometry and Topology (Progress in Mathematics, 296). Birkhäuser/Springer, New York, 2012, pp. 169–197.Google Scholar
[10]Mather, J. N.. Commutators of diffeomorphisms I. Comment. Math. Helv. 49 (1974), 512–528.Google Scholar
[11]Mather, J. N.. Commutators of diffeomorphisms II. Comment. Math. Helv. 50 (1975), 33–40.Google Scholar
[12]Tsuboi, T.. On the uniform perfectness of diffeomorphism groups. Groups of Diffeomorphisms: In Honor of Shigeyuki Morita on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday (Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics, 52). Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 2008.Google Scholar