Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:44:43.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Smooth foliations by circles of $S^{7}$ with unbounded periods and nonlinearizable multicentres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

MASSIMO VILLARINI*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, Informatiche e Matematiche, via Campi 213/b 41100, Universitá di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy email massimo.villarini@unimore.it

Abstract

We give an example of a $C^{\infty }$ vector field $X$, defined in a neighbourhood $U$ of $0\in \mathbb{R}^{8}$, such that $U-\{0\}$ is foliated by closed integral curves of $X$, the differential $DX(0)$ at $0$ defines a one-parameter group of non-degenerate rotations and $X$ is not orbitally equivalent to its linearization. Such a vector field $X$ has the first integral $I(x)=\Vert x\Vert ^{2}$, and its main feature is that its period function is locally unbounded near the stationary point. This proves in the $C^{\infty }$ category that the classical Poincaré centre theorem, true for planar non-degenerate centres, is not generalizable to multicentres. Such an example is obtained through a careful study and a suitable modification of a celebrated example by Sullivan [A counterexample to the periodic orbit conjecture. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 46 (1976), 5–14], by blowing up the stationary point at the origin and through the construction of a smooth one-parameter family of foliations by circles of $S^{7}$ whose orbits have unbounded lengths (equivalently, unbounded periods) for each value of the parameter and which smoothly converges to the Hopf fibration $S^{1}{\hookrightarrow}S^{7}\rightarrow \mathbb{CP}^{3}$.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Besse, A.. Manifolds All of Whose Geodesics are Closed (Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 93) . Springer, Berlin, 1978.Google Scholar
Brunella, M. and Villarini, M.. On the Poincaré–Lyapunov centre theorem. Bol. Soc. Mat. Mexicana (3) 5 (1999), 155161.Google Scholar
Edwards, R., Millet, K. and Sullivan, D.. Foliations with all leaves compact. Topology 16 (1977), 1332.Google Scholar
Epstein, D. B. A.. Periodic flows on three-manifolds. Ann. of Math. (2) 95 (1972), 6682.Google Scholar
Epstein, D. B. A. and Vogt, E.. A counterexample to the periodic orbit conjecture in codimension 3. Ann. of Math. (2) 108(3) (1978), 539552.Google Scholar
Godbillon, C.. Feuilletages: Etude Geometriques (Progress in Mathematics, 98) . Birkhauser, Boston, MA, 1991.Google Scholar
Kreyszig, E.. Differential Geometry. Dover, Mineola, NY, 1991, reprinted from University of Toronto Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Milnor, J.. On manifolds homeomorphic to the 7-sphere. Ann. of Math. (2) 64 (1956), 309405.Google Scholar
Moser, J.. Regularization of the Kepler’s problem and the averaging method on a manifold. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. XXIII (1970), 609636.Google Scholar
Moussu, R.. Une démonstration d’un théoreme de Lyapunov–Poincaré. Astérisque 98–99 (1982), 216223.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H.. Sur les courbes definies par les equations differentielles. J. Math. Pures Appl. (4) 1 (1885), 167244 or Oeuvres. Tome I. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1956, pp. 90–114.Google Scholar
Steenrod, N.. The Topology of Fibre Bundles (Princeton Mathematical Series, 14) . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1951.Google Scholar
Stillwell, J.. Naive Lie Theory (Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, 140) . Springer, New York, 2008.Google Scholar
Sullivan, D.. A counterexample to the periodic orbit conjecture. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 46 (1976), 514.Google Scholar
Urabe, M. and Sibuya, Y.. On centers of higher dimensions. J. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. A 19(1) (1955), 87100.Google Scholar
Villarini, M.. Smooth linearization of centres. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse IX(3) (2000), 565570.Google Scholar