Skip to main content Accessibility help

Implementing a data sharing culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2016

Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]


Image of the first page of this article
Editors' Note
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Data sharing is the process of sharing with other researchers the deidentified individual patient data underlying the results presented in scientific articles. Recently, the US Institute of Medicine urged biomedical journals, as evaluators and publishers of research results, and implementers of academic standards, to enforce policies that require sharing of clinical trial data (Institute of Medicine, 2015). The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) pointed out that there is an ethical obligation to responsibly share data generated by interventional clinical trials because participants have put themselves at risk (Longo & Drazen, Reference Longo and Drazen2016; Taichman et al. Reference Taichman, Backus, Baethge, Bauchner, Leeuw, Drazen, Fletcher and Frizelle2016). In addition to clinical trial data, it has been argued that results from observational studies should similarly be shared for the same reasons (Barbui, Reference Barbui2016).

Accountability is a first reason for sharing data. By accessing the raw information underlying the results presented in an article, other researchers may re-run the same analyses that are presented by the study authors, or may plan different analyses to answer the same research question, thus confirming (replicating) the main findings or raising concerns about their robustness and validity under different analytical or statistical assumptions. A second reason for sharing the data is that other researchers may use the shared dataset to answer a different research question. A third reason is that shared datasets of similarly collected data may be used within systematic reviews, to run meta-analyses and individual-patient data meta-analyses. Some also argue that shared datasets may be effectively used for educational purposes (Feldman et al. Reference Feldman, Patel, Ortmann, Robinson and Popovic2012).

There are also challenges in sharing data (Gewin, Reference Gewin2016), such as preserving patient privacy and confidentiality (Sarpatwari et al. Reference Sarpatwari, Kesselheim, Malin, Gagne and Schneeweiss2014), giving credit to those who conducted the study and collected the data (Longo & Drazen, Reference Longo and Drazen2016), the cost for developing reliable repositories of data, and the additional work and cost for researchers, who may be asked to develop datasets suitable for use by others and perhaps to pay for hosting the data in a repository. Running new analyses on shared datasets may also pose scientific issues, as these new analyses, by definition, cannot be pre-planned and may therefore suffer from being guided by the data.

However, solutions to these challenges are coming. Researchers should consider the issue of data sharing from the very beginning of their research projects, by including for example a data sharing plan in the study protocol. It may report a procedure for including provision for data sharing when gaining informed consent, preserving patient confidentiality and privacy when data are shared (Sarpatwari et al. Reference Sarpatwari, Kesselheim, Malin, Gagne and Schneeweiss2014; El Emam et al. Reference El Emam, Rodgers and Malin2015), and details of what is planned to be shared and how, with a timeline. This is relevant as developing a high-quality database in a way suitable for secondary uses may require considerable work, and how the raw data are shared may depend on the type of data that are collected (sometimes it is possible to present the raw data in the main manuscript or in additional supporting files, sometimes a web-based repository is needed). Researchers should also draft a detailed publication plan, with a timeline, in order to give those who gathered the data a chance to make the best use of the database (Drazen, Reference Drazen2014).

Current policies of biomedical journals are very heterogeneous (Barbui, Reference Barbui2016). Some journals do not mention data sharing, and do not require any statement to be published along with the study report on the possibility to access the raw data. Other journals encourage data sharing, and require a formal statement describing under which conditions raw data are accessible. A third policy is implemented by PLOS journals, which require fully availability of all data underlying the findings described in published study reports.

Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences announces the implementation of the following requirement on data sharing:

For all research articles (randomised controlled trials, observational studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses) authors are encouraged to link their articles to the raw data from their studies. We encourage authors to ensure that their datasets are either deposited in publicly available repositories (where available and appropriate) or presented in the main manuscript or additional supporting files whenever possible. All authors must include an ‘Availability of Data and Materials’ section in their manuscript detailing where the data supporting their findings can be found. Authors who do not wish to share their data must state that data will not be shared, and give the reason.”

We hope to contribute to the implementation of a new data sharing culture. Currently, a scientific output only corresponds to a study report published in a medical journal, while in the near future it might consist of all materials described in the manuscript, including all relevant raw data. We need to change how we think about data (Drazen, Reference Drazen2015). Data sharing and open science are the future of science.



Financial Support


Conflict of Interest

No financial conflicts of interest to declare. CB, as one of the Editors of the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders group, has a strong interest in accessing raw data from clinical studies. As a researcher, CB has recently been involved in the publication of an observational study that required full data sharing.


Barbui, C (2016). Sharing all types of clinical data and harmonizing journal standards. BMC Med 14, 63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drazen, JM (2014). Open data. New England Journal of Medicine 370, 662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drazen, JM (2015). Sharing individual patient data from clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine 372, 201202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El Emam, K, Rodgers, S, Malin, B (2015). Anonymising and sharing individual patient data. BMJ 350, h1139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, L, Patel, D, Ortmann, L, Robinson, K, Popovic, T (2012). Educating for the future: another important benefit of data sharing. Lancet 379, 18771878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gewin, V (2016). Data sharing: an open mind on open data. Nature 529, 117119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute of Medicine (2015). Sharing clinical trial data: maximizing benefits, minimizing risk. Scholar
Longo, DL, Drazen, JM (2016). Data sharing. New England Journal of Medicine 374, 276277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarpatwari, A, Kesselheim, AS, Malin, BA, Gagne, JJ, Schneeweiss, S (2014). Ensuring patient privacy in data sharing for postapproval research. New England Journal of Medicine 371, 16441649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taichman, DB, Backus, J, Baethge, C, Bauchner, H, Leeuw, PW, Drazen, JM, Fletcher, J, Frizelle, FA (2016). Sharing clinical trial data. BMJ 532, i255.Google ScholarPubMed

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 68
Total number of PDF views: 266 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-77fc7d77f9-w9qs9 Total loading time: 0.885 Render date: 2021-01-16T19:15:37.983Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "1", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Sat Jan 16 2021 19:00:55 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": true, "languageSwitch": true, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Implementing a data sharing culture
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Implementing a data sharing culture
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Implementing a data sharing culture
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *