Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Growing recognition of the importance of service user involvement in mental health service planning and evaluation

  • Graham Thornicroft (a1) and Michele Tansella (a2)

Summary

Service user involvement in the planning and provision of mental health services has been growing over the last two decades, especially in countries and areas where institutional service provision has been changed to a community-orientated model of care. However, the material involvement of service users in mental health research is still in its infancy. The aim of this paper is to attempt to place these developments in a conceptual context, to summarise the ethics-based and evidence-based reasons why it has to be considered as necessary, and to illustrate some of the emerging evidence which shows the advantages to be gained from it. In particular the results of recent studies are briefly reported, showing that outcomes data rated by service users in some cases are more important than those rated by staff. The reduction in patient-rated unmet needs in the social domain was the strongest predictor of an increase in subjective quality of life. The importance of including service user preferences within the content of the research questions is exemplified by the results of a recent study that showed that joint crisis plans can significantly reduce the use of compulsory admission during crises and by a review that demonstrated that the use of an explicit service user perspective produced distinctive insights into the long-term effects of Electro-Convulsive Therapy (ECT).

Declaration of Interest: none.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Professor G. Thornicroft, Section of Community Psychiatry (PRiSM). Health Service Research Department. Institute of Psychiatry. King's CollegeLondon. De Crespigny Park. London SE5 8AF (UK). Fax: +44-207-277.1462 E-mail: g.thornicroft@iop.kcl.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Beresford, P. (2005). Developing the theoretical basis for service user/survivor-led research and equal involvement in research. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 14, 49.
Bowis, J. (2005). Whose mind is it anyway? Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 14, 3943.
Chamberlain, J. (2005). User/consumer involvement in mental health service delivery. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 14, 1014.
Faulkner, A. & Thomas, P. (2002). User-led research and evidence-based medicine. British Journal of Psychiatry 180, 13.
Hart, A., Saunders, A. & Thomas, H. (2005). Attuned Practice: a service user study of specialist child and adolesent mental health in the UK. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 14, 2231.
Henderson, C., Flood, C., Leese, M., Thornicroft, G., Sutherby, K. & Szmukler, G. (2004). Effect of joint crisis plans on use of compulsion in psychiatric treatment: single blind RCT. British Medical Journal 329, 136138.
Kokaliari, E.D. & Lanzaro, K. (2005). Deliberate self-injury. A consumer-therapist co-run group. A choice or a necessity? Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 14, 3238.
Lasalvia, A., Bonetto, C., Malchiodi, F., Salvi, G.Parabiaghi, A., Tansella, M. & Ruggeri, M. (submitted for publication). Listening to patients' needs to improve their quality of life. A follow-up study in community psychiatric care.
Lehmann, P. (2005). All about PSY DREAM. Psychiatric drug registration, evaluation and all-inclusive monitoring. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 14, 1521.
Rose, D.. Fleischmann, P.. Wykes, T., Leese, M. & Bindman, J. (2003). Patients' perspectives on electroconvulsive therapy: systematic review. British Medical Journal 326, 1363.
Rose, D.Thornicroft, G. & Slade, M. (submitted for publication). Who decides what is evidence? Developing a multiple perspectives paradigm in mental health.
Slade, M., Phelan, M. & Thornicroft, G. (1998). A comparison of needs assessed by staff and by an epidemiologically representative sample of patients with psychosis. Psychological Medicine 28, 543550.
Slade, M., Leese, M., Kuipers, E.. Thornicroft, G., Ruggeri, M. & Tansella, M. (2004). Does meeting needs improve quality of life? Psychotherapy Psychosomatics 73, 183189.
Strategies for Living (2003). Surviving User-Led Research. Mental Health Foundation: London.
Thornicroft, G. & Slade, M. (2002). Comparing needs assessed by staff and by service users: paternalism or partnership in mental health? Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 11, 186191.
Thornicroft, G. & Tansella, M. (1999a). The Mental Health Matrix; a Manual to Improve Services. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Thornicroft, G. & Tansella, M. (1999b). Translating ethical principles into outcome measures for mental health service research. Psychological Medicine 29, 761767.
Thornicroft, G., Rose, D., Huxley, P., Dale, G. & Wykes, T. (2002). Editorial: What are the research priorities of mental health service users? Journal of Mental Health 11(1), 15.
Trivedi, P. & Wykes, T. (2002). From passive subjects to equal partners: qualitative review of user involvement in research. British Journal of Psychiatry 181, 468472.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed