Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T04:50:33.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ventilation of operating-theatres.*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Robert Blowers
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, General Hospital, Middlesbrough
Beryl Crew
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, General Hospital, Middlesbrough
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Pathogenic bacteria are removed from air by relatively simple filters having an efficiency of 99·9% for 5-μ particles.

2. To prevent ingress of contaminated air from other parts of the hospital an operating-room should be pressurized by a flow of filtered air. An input flow of 1200 cu. ft. (34 cu. m.) per min. will ensure this if mechanical exhaust fans are replaced by pressure-relief valves.

3. Other rooms of the suite should be ventilated in this way with flow rates depending on door area, and with pressure gradients adjusted by relief-valve loadings to cause air flow from dirtier to cleaner zones.

4. All openings between the rooms of an operating-suite should be fitted with doors to prevent airborne cross-contamination and high-level loss of ventilating air.

5. The relative merits of turbulent and downward-displacement ventilation have been studied and are discussed. The choice between them depends on the sites from which pathogenic bacteria are mainly disseminated during operations; these are not yet fully understood but the available evidence favours the displacement system. Methods for producing turbulent and displacement ventilation are described.

6. Discomfort from overheating of operating-rooms is largely due to faulty design and siting of sterilizing equipment. In Britain, if these faults are avoided, ventilation without cooling equipment can give comfortable conditions except on very rare occasions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

References

Blowers, R. (1958). In Medical Annual. Bristol: John Wright and Sons.Google Scholar
Blowers, R., Mason, G. A., Wallace, K. R. & Walton, M. (1955). Lancet, ii, 786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdillon, R. B. & Colebrook, L. (1946). Lancet i, 561 and 601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdillon, R. B., Lidwell, O. M. & Lovelock, J. E. (1948). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun. (Lond.), no. 262, p. 54.Google Scholar
Bourdillon, R. B., Lidwell, O. M. & Thomas, J. C. (1948). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun. (Lond.), no. 262, p. 19.Google Scholar
Duguid, J. P. & Wallace, A. T. (1948). Lancet, ii, 845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. & Thomas, C. G. A. (1956). Brit. med. J. ii, 840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidwell, O. M. (1959). J. sci. Instrum. 36, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. (1954). Lancet, i, 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. & Lilly, H. A. (1955). J. Path. Bact. 70, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. & Lilly, H. A. (1958). Brit. med. J., ii, 1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, K. R. (1949). J. appl. Phys. 20, 932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shooter, R. A., Smith, M. A. & Hunter, C. J. W. (1959). Brit. J. Surg. 47, 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shooter, R. A., Taylor, G. W., Ellis, G. & Ross, J. P. (1956). Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 103, 257.Google Scholar
Williams, R. E. O. & Lidwell, O. M. (1960). J. Hyg., Lond., 58, 449.Google Scholar