Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-15T01:49:51.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The survival of bacteria during and after drying

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. M. Fry
Affiliation:
Public Helath Laboratory Service, Cambridge and Departmant of Pathology, University of Cambridge
R. I. N. Greaves
Affiliation:
Public Helath Laboratory Service, Cambridge and Departmant of Pathology, University of Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An investigation of the survival rate of bacteria after drying in vacuo by the ' spin–freeze' method showed that one of the most important factors was the fluid in which the bacteria were suspended. Broth or nutrient gelatin gave a moderate survival rate, but in various other protein solutions, even though there might be a fair survival immediately after drying, a large fall occurred in the viable count after storage. The addition of glucose to the suspending fluid in concentrations of between 5 and 10% greatly increased the survival rate both immediately and after storage. Some experiments showed that, without added glucose, the longer the drying process was continued the lower was the survival rate, and it is thought that glucose acts by automatically retaining a small amount of water which is necessary for survival. Lactose appears to produce the same effect.

It is shown that the highest death-rate generally occurs during the early stages of drying, the further drop after 24 hr. being small if glucose is used in the suspending fluid. Very young cultures (4½–6 hr.) seem to be far more sensitive to drying than older ones (18–24 hr.). The bacteria that survive drying are not more resistant to subsequent drying.

Most of these results have been obtained with one strain of paracolon bacillus, but a limited number of other experiments show that the same principles hold good for other organisms such as Salmonella typhi-murium, staphylococci, streptococci, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Vibrio cholerae. In the case of the last two species the percentage survival is much lower than with the others, but survivals up to 1% have been obtained after storage for from 1 to 3 years.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1951

References

REFERENCES

Greaves, R. I. N. (1944). Centrifugal vacuum freezing. Its application to the drying of biological materials from the frozen state. Nature, Lond. 153, 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greaves, R. I. N. (1946). The preservation of proteins by drying. Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Lond. no. 258.Google Scholar
Herbert, D. (1949). Studies on the nature of Pasteurella pestis, and factors affecting the growth of isolated cells on an agar surface. Brit. J. exp. Path. 30, 509.Google Scholar
Leshchinskaya, E. N. (1944). The immunizing value of the B.C.G. dry glucose vaccine. Problemy tuberculeza, no. 6, pp. 55–9. Translated in Amer. Rev. Soviet Med. Feb. 1946, pp. 210–15. Reviewed in Publ. Hlth Rep., Wash. (1947), 62, 211.Google Scholar
Miles, A. A. & Misra, S. S. (1938). Estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. J. Hyg., Camb. 38, 732.Google ScholarPubMed
Proom, H. & Hemmons, L. M. (1949). The drying and preservation of bacterial cultures. J. gen. Microbiol. 3, 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stamp, Lord (1947). The preservation of bacteria by drying. J. gen. Microbiol. 1, 251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, G. S. & Miles, A. A. (1946). Topley and Wilson's Principles of Bacteriology and Immunity, 3rd ed.London: Edward Arnold and Co.Google Scholar
Wright, A. E. & Colebrook, L. (1921). Technique of the Teat and Capillary Glass Tube, 2nd ed.London: Constable and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar