Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:11:06.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subdivision of Salmonella enteritidis phage types by plasmid profile typing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

E. J. Threlfall
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory Service, Central Public Health Laboratory, Division of Enteric Pathogens, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT
B. Rowe
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory Service, Central Public Health Laboratory, Division of Enteric Pathogens, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT
L. R. Ward
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory Service, Central Public Health Laboratory, Division of Enteric Pathogens, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Differentiation of Salmonella enteritidis by plasmid profile typing has been compared to differentiation by phage typing. Examination of the type strains of the 27 S. enteritidis phage types showed that only 11 profile patterns could be identified. Moreover, two profile patterns were found in 15 of the type strains, including those of the two most common phage types in Britain, types 4 and 8. On this basis, plasmid profile typing is not as sensitive as phage typing for the primary subdivision of S. enteritidis.

When differentiation of 534 strains of the 27 phage types was attempted using plasmid profiles, variation in pattern suitable for epidemiologieal subdivision was found in 13 phage types and there were 9 profile patterns in strains of phage type 4. Plasmid profile typing can, therefore, be regarded as an effective adjunct to phage typing for the subdivision of S. enteritidis

Type
Special Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

References

REFERENCES

Brunner, F., Margadant, A. & Peduzzi, R. (1983). The plasmid pattern as an epidemiologic tool for Salmonella typhimurium epidemics: comparison with the lysotype. Journal of Infectious Diseases 148, 711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmberg, S. D., Wachsmuth, I. K., Hickman-Brenner, F. W. & Cohen, M. L. (1984). Comparison of plasmid profile analysis, phage typing, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing in characterising Salmonella typhimurium isolates from outbreaks. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 19, 100104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kado, C. I. & Liu, S. -T. (1981). Procedure for detection and isolation of large and small plasmids. Journal of Bacteriology 145, 13651373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macrina, F. L., Kopecko, D. J., Jones, K. R., Ayers, D. J. & McCowan, S. M. (1978). A multiple plasmid-containing Escherichia coli strain: convenient source of size reference plasmid molecules. Plasmid 1, 417420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Threlfall, E. J., Hall, M. L. M. & Rowe, B. (1986). Salmonella gold-coast from outbreaks of food-poisoning in the British Isles can be differentiated by plasmid profiles. Journal of Hygiene 97, 115122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Threlfall, E. J., Rowe, B., Ferguson, J. L. & Ward, L. R. (1986). Characterization of plasmids conferring resistance to gentamicin and apramycin in strains of Salmonella typhimurium phage type 204c isolated in Britain. Journal of Hygiene 97, 419426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Threlfall, E. J., Rowe, B. & Ward, L. R. (1987). Increase in prevalence of a neomycin/kanamycin-sensitive variant of S. typhimurium DT204c in cattle in Britain. Veterinary Record 120, 366367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, L. R., De Sa, J. D. H. & Rowe, B. (1987). A phage-typing scheme for Salmonella enteritidis. Epidemiology and Infection 99, 291294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wray, C., McLaren, I., Parkinson, N. M. & Beedell, Y.(1987). Differentiation of Salmonella typhimurium DT204c by plasmid profile and biotyping. Veterinary Record 121, 514516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed