Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A Study Of English Diets By The Individual Method: Part II. Women

  • E. M. Widdowson (a1) and R. A. McCance (a1)

Summary

1. The food intakes of sixty-three women of the English middle class have been studied by the individual method and compared with those of men which were described in a previous paper.

2. The average calorie consumption was 2187 per day. Although it is not suggested that this is the optimum intake, it would appear from these results that the “man value” of a woman is 0·7, and not 0·8 as is usually supposed. The individual calorie consumptions varied from 1453 to 3110 per day.

3. The average daily protein intake was 67 g., and no subject was eating more than 90 g.

4. Fat and carbohydrate contributed almost equally to the calorie value of the diet. The proportion of total calories derived from fat (42·7 per cent.) is higher than any previously recorded figures in Europe or America.

5. The average amount of calcium in the diets was 0·63 g. per day. Fourteen individuals were having less than 0·5 g., and one only 0·23 g.

6. The mean intakes of total and available phosphorus were 1·32 and 1·09 g. respectively.

7. A study has been carried out on six women, whose husbands were unemployed. Their intake of all dietary constituents, except carbohydrate, were considerably lower than were found for the women of the middle class.

Acknowledgments. The authors wish to thank Miss E. E. Franklin for her help with the calculations, Miss A. Cameron for her co-operation with regard to the unemployed, and all the subjects, without whose support the investigation would never have been carried out. One of us (E. M. W.) is indebted to the Medical Eesearch Council for a part-time grant.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A Study Of English Diets By The Individual Method: Part II. Women
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A Study Of English Diets By The Individual Method: Part II. Women
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A Study Of English Diets By The Individual Method: Part II. Women
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Actuarial Society of America (1929). Medical Impairment Studies.
Atwater, W. O. (1902). U.S. Dept. Agric. Farmers' Bull. 142, 88.
Biowood, E. J. and Roost, G. (1934). L'Alimentation rationlle. Publ. de l'Institut Solvay, Bruxelles.
British Medical Association (1933). Report of Committee on Nutrition.
Cathcart, E. P. and Murray, A. M. T. (1931 a). J. Nutrition, 3, 483.
Cathcart, E. P. and Murray, A. M. T. (1931 b). Med. Res. Counc. Special Report Series, No. 151.
Clark, M. L. (1933). Brit. Med. J. ii, 977.
Denis, W. and Borgstrom, P. (1924). J. Biol. Chem. 61, 109.
Hawley, E. (1927). U.S. Dept. Agric. Tech. Bull. No. 8. Washington.
Hawley, E. (1929). U.S. Dept. Agric. Circular, No. 89.
Hetler, R. A. (1932). J. Nutrition, 5, 69.
Kramer, M. M., Evers, H. P. et al. (1934). Ibid. 7, 89.
League of Nations (1932). Quart. Bull, of the Health Organisation.
League of Nations (1935). Report on the Physiological Bases of Nutrition.
Lusk, G. (1917). The Science of Nutrition. 3rd ed.
Magee, H. E. et al. (1935). Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 28, 713.
Mccance, R. A. and Widdowson, E. M. (1935). Biochem. J. 29, 2694.
Ministry of Health (1934). Committee on Nutrition. The Criticism and Improvement of Diets.
Mitchell, H. (1935). J. Amer. Diet. Ass. 11, 28.
Orr, J. B. (1936). Food, Health and Income. Macmillan.
Peller, S. (1931). Z.f. Ernährung, 1, 247.
Sherman, H. C. (1920). J. Biol. Chem. 44, 21.
Sherman, H. C. (1933). Chemistry of Food and Nutrition. New York.
Stiebeling, H. K. and Ward, M. M. (1933). U.S. Dept. Agric. Circular, No. 296.
Toverud, K. U. and Toverud, G. (1930). Act. paediat. 2, 543.
Tyszka, v. (1935). Klin. Wochenschr. 14, 553 and 593.
Wheeler, R. and Mallay, R. (1935). J. Amer. Diet. Ass. 10, 453.
Widdowson, E. M. (1936). J. Hygiene, 36, 269.
Widdowson, E. M. and Mccance, R. A. (1936). Ibid. 36, 13.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed