Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T12:48:06.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strontium chloride and strontium selenite enrichment broth media in the isolation of Salmonella

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. B. Iveson  and
E. M. Mackay-Scollay
J. B. Iveson
Affiliation:
Salmonella Diagnostic and Reference Laboratory, Perth, Western Australia
E. M. Mackay-Scollay
Affiliation:
Salmonella Diagnostic and Reference Laboratory, Perth, Western Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two new media, strontium chloride and strontium selenite broths, are described for the enrichment culture of Salmonella from human and animal material.

In comparative trials, strontium chloride was found to be comparable to Rappaport medium for the recovery of a wide range of Salmonella serotypes from human faeces and sewage, and from pig faeces and glands. Both were superior to selenite F medium.

Strontium selenite was found to be superior to selenite F in the recovery of S. typhi from human faeces and sewage.

We are greatly indebted to Mr M. H. Lello for preparing the samples of strontium selenite used in the investigation and for allowing us to publish the notes on his method of preparing the substance.

Our thanks are due to Pro. C. T. Huang of Hong Kong for sending samples of faeces from typhoid cases under his care; and to Dr Joan Taylor for her continuing help in confirming or identifying the serotypes of salmonella isolated.

We thank Dr W. S. Davidson, Commissioner of Public Health, Western Australia, for permission to publish.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , September 1969 , pp. 457 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

References

Anderson, K. & Kennedy, H. (1965). Comparison of selective media for the isolation of salmonellae. J. clin. Path. 18, 747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banič, S. (1964). A new enrichment medium for salmonellae. J. Hyg., Camb. 62, 25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collard, P. & Unwin, M. (1958). A trial of Rappaport's medium. J. clin. Path. 11, 426.Google Scholar
Cook, G. T., Frisby, B. R. & Jebb, W. H. H. (1951). The routine use of selective and enrichment media for the isolation of salmonellae. Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth. 10, 89.Google ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, P. (1918). Untersuchungen über spezifische Desinfektionsvorgänge. II. Ueber die Wirkung von Salzen und Ionen auf Bakterien. Zentbl. Bakt. ParasitKde, (Abt I) 82, 69.Google Scholar
Hobbs, B. C. & Allison, V. D. (1945). Studies on the isolation of Bact. typhosum and Bact. paratyphosum B. Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth 4, 63.Google ScholarPubMed
Hooper, W. L. & Jenkins, H. R. (1965). An evaluation of Rappaport's magnesium chloride/malachite green medium in the routine examination of faeces. J. Hyg., Camb. 63, 491.Google ScholarPubMed
Hotchkiss, M. (1923). Studies on salt action. VI. The stimulatory and inhibitive effect of certain cations upon bacterial growth. J. Bact. 81, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iveson, J. B. & Kovacs, N. (1967). A comparative trial of Rappaport enrichment medium for the isolation of salmonellae from faeces. J. clin. Path. 20, 290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leifson, E. (1936). New selenite enrichment media for the isolation of typhoid and para typhoid (Salmonella) bacilli. Am. J. Hyg. 24, 423.Google Scholar
McCoy, J. H. (1962). The isolation of salmonellae. J. appl. Bact. 25, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, B., Perry, E. L. & Chard, S. T. (1952). A survey by the sewage swab method of latent enteric infection in an urban area. J. Hyg., Camb. 50, 137.Google Scholar
Müller, L. (1923). Un nouveau milieu d'enrichissement pour le recherche du bacilli typhique et des paratyphiques. C. r. Séanc. Soc. Biol. 89, 434.Google Scholar
Preuss, H. (1949). Übereine neue Tetrathionat-Anreicherung. Z. Hyg. InfecktKrankh. 129, 187.Google Scholar
Rappaport, F. & Konforth, N. (1958). Selective enrichment medium for paratyphoid bacteria. Inhibitory and growth-promoting factors. Appl. Microbiol. 7, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, F., Konforti, N. & Navon, B. (1956). A new enrichment medium for certain salmonellae. J. clin. Path. 9, 261.Google Scholar
Sachs, A. (1939). Difficulties associated with the bacteriological diagnosis of bacillary dysentery. Jl. R. Army med. Cps. 73, 235.Google Scholar
Smith, H. Williams.(1952). The evaluation of culture media for the isolation of salmonellae from faeces. J. Hyg., Camb. 50, 21.Google Scholar
Smith, H. Williams.(1959). The isolation of salmonellae from the mesenteric lymph nodes and faeces of pigs, cattle, sheep, dogs and cats and from other organs of poultry. J. Hyg., Camb. 57, 266.Google Scholar
Zajc-Satler, J. & Banič, S. (1965). Efficiency of different selective media for the isolation of salmonellae from faeces. J. clin. Path. 18, 750.Google Scholar