Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Stakeholder prioritization of zoonoses in Japan with analytic hierarchy process method

  • M. KADOHIRA (a1), G. HILL (a1), R. YOSHIZAKI (a2), S. OTA (a3) and Y. YOSHIKAWA (a4)...

Summary

There exists an urgent need to develop iterative risk assessment strategies of zoonotic diseases. The aim of this study is to develop a method of prioritizing 98 zoonoses derived from animal pathogens in Japan and to involve four major groups of stakeholders: researchers, physicians, public health officials, and citizens. We used a combination of risk profiling and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Profiling risk was accomplished with semi-quantitative analysis of existing public health data. AHP data collection was performed by administering questionnaires to the four stakeholder groups. Results showed that researchers and public health officials focused on case fatality as the chief important factor, while physicians and citizens placed more weight on diagnosis and prevention, respectively. Most of the six top-ranked diseases were similar among all stakeholders. Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy, severe acute respiratory syndrome, and Ebola fever were ranked first, second, and third, respectively.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Stakeholder prioritization of zoonoses in Japan with analytic hierarchy process method
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Stakeholder prioritization of zoonoses in Japan with analytic hierarchy process method
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Stakeholder prioritization of zoonoses in Japan with analytic hierarchy process method
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

* Author for correspondence: Mr G. Hill, Assistant Professor, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Department of Human Sciences, Inada-cho Nishi 2-11, Obihiro 080-8555 Japan (Email: hill@obihiro.ac.jp)

References

Hide All
1. Shimada, J. Why should the communicable disease prevention law be revised now? [in Japanese]. Nippon Naika Gakkai Zasshi 1999; 88: 13.
2. Nomura, T, Takahashi, H, Takeda, Y. Changes in measures against infectious diseases in Japan and proposals for the future. Japan Medical Association Journal 2003; 46: 390400.
3. Nomura, T. Infectious diseases [in Japanese]. Chiryo 2000; 82: 10431052.
4. Kraüse, G and the Working Group on Prioritisation at the Robert Koch Institute. Prioritisation of infectious diseases in public health – call for comments. Eurosurveillance 2008; 13: 16.
5. Mangen, MJJ, et al. Integrated approaches for the public health prioritization of foodborne and zoonotic pathogens. Risk Analysis 2010; 30: 782797.
6. Ng, V, Sargeant, JM. A stakeholder-informed approach to the identification of criteria for the prioritization of zoonoses in Canada. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e29752.
7. Saaty, TL. Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making. Why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors. The analytic hierarchy/network process. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales, Serie A: Matematicas 2008; 102: 251318.
8. Simões da Silva, AC, Nelderrain, MCN, Pantoja, FCM. Prioritization of R&D projects in the aerospace sector: AHP method with ratings. Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management 2010; 2: 339348.
9. Mulye, R. An empirical comparison of three variants of the AHP and two variants of conjoint analysis. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1998; 11: 263280.
10. Meibner, M, Decker, R. An empirical comparison of CBC and AHP for measuring consumer preferences. International Symposium of Analytical Hierarchy Process, Pittsburgh, 2009.
11. Ng, V, Sargeant, JM. A quantitative and novel approach to the prioritization of zoonotic diseases in North America: A public perspective. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e48519.
12. Humblet, M-F, et al. Multidisciplinary and evidence-based method for prioritizing diseases of food-producing animals and zoonoses. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2012; 18: e1.
13. Takahagi, E, Nakajima, N. Introduction to the AHP method using Excel [in Japanese]. Tokyo: Ohmsha, 2005.
14. IFAH-Europe. Approaches to the prioritisation of diseases: a worldwide review of existing methodologies to prioritise disease. DISCONTOOLS Project, Disease Control Tools, Work Package 2, version 4, Brussels, 2011.
15. WHO. Guideline on setting priorities in communicable disease surveillance (http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/surveillance/WHO_CDS_EPR_LYO_2006_3/en/index.html). Accessed 20 December 2013.
16. ETPGAH Action Plan. 2007. (http://www.etpgah.eu/component/downloads/downloads/61.html). Accessed 20 December 2013.
17. McKenzie, J, Simpson, H, Langstaff, I. Development of methodology to prioritise wildlife pathogens for surveillance. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2007; 81: 194210.
18. Ng, V, Sargeant, J. An empirical and quantitative approach to the prioritization of zoonotic diseases of public health importance in Canada, Abstract (http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10393-010-0376-0). ECOHEALTH 2011; 7 (Suppl. 1): S114
19. Havelaar, AH, et al. Prioritizing emerging zoonoses in the Netherlands. PLoS ONE 2010; 5: e13965.
20. Organisation for Animal Health Phylum. OIE study: listing and categorisation of priority animal diseases, including those transmissible to humans. Mission report 2010 (http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/diseases/strategy/pillars/action_1_3_1_en.htm). Parts 1 and 2. Accessed 20 December 2013.
21. Ng, V, Sargeant, JM. A quantitative approach to the prioritization of zoonotic diseases in North America: A health professionals’ perspective. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e72172
22. Kadohira, M, et al. Bridging the gap between BSE risk assessment and consumer perception of the surveillance system in Japan. Research Bulletin of Obihiro University 2011; 32: 113.
23. Ogoshi, K, et al. Consumer reactions to risk information on bovine spongiform encephalopathy in Japan. Environmental Health and Preventative Medicine 2010; 15: 311318.

Keywords

Stakeholder prioritization of zoonoses in Japan with analytic hierarchy process method

  • M. KADOHIRA (a1), G. HILL (a1), R. YOSHIZAKI (a2), S. OTA (a3) and Y. YOSHIKAWA (a4)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed