Seroepidemiology of <span class="italic">Toxoplasma gondii</span> infection in free-range chickens (<span class="italic">Gallus domesticus</span>) of Central Ethiopia

E. Z. GEBREMEDHIN; G. TESFAMARYAM; H. A. YUNUS; R. DUGUMA; G. TILAHUN; V. DI MARCO; M. VITALE

doi:10.1017/S0950268814000971

Summary

We performed a seroepidemiological study of Toxoplasma gondii infection in free-range chickens from October 2012 to May 2013. We used cross-sectional two-stage cluster sampling to collect blood samples from wing veins of 601 chickens from central Ethiopia. T. gondii-specific antibodies were assayed by modified agglutination test (MAT). We collected information about risk factors by questionnaire and used univariable and multivariable logistic regression to assess risk factors. An overall seroprevalence of 30·5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26·27–34·14] and 54·2% (95% CI 47·06–61·36) was found at animal- and flock-level, respectively. The MAT end titre of seropositive chickens (n = 183) were 1 : 60 in 46, 1 : 180 in 28, 1 : 540 in 29, ⩾1 : 1620 in 48, 1 : 6000 in 22, 1 : 18 000 in five, 1 : 54 000 in one, and ⩾1 : 162 000 in four. Animal-level risk factors identified using multivariable logistic regression model were: midland altitude [odds ratio (OR) 2·53, 95% CI 1·12–5·72], cross and exotic breeds (OR 3·17, 95% CI 1·39–7·23), increased age of chickens (OR 2·32, 95% CI 1·19–4·49), extensive management (OR 6·92, 95% CI 1·34–35·86) and the presence of cats (OR 2·08, 95% CI 1·20–3·61). Similarly, flock-level risk factors were midland altitude (OR 3·62, 95% CI 1·31–9·99) and the presence of cats (OR 1·19–4·94). The knowledge of the local people about the health risk of cats to humans and animals is poor. Housing and management of cats and chickens are also poor. The widespread presence of T. gondii infection in free-range chickens of Central Ethiopia provides suggestive evidence for the high level of contamination of the living environment of people with T. gondii oocysts. Meat from free-range chickens might be an important source of infection for humans. Altitude, breed, age, management and presence of cats are independent predictors of seropositivity. Education of farmers about toxoplasmosis and further studies to elucidate the burden of toxoplasmosis in animals and humans warrants consideration.

INTRODUCTION

Ethiopia is estimated to have a chicken population of 42 million [1] of which over 95% are kept under a traditional backyard scavenging system [2]. Backyard poultry represents an important part of the national economy and provides about 98·5% and 99·2% of national egg and poultry meat production, respectively [2]. Lack of knowledge about poultry production, limitations of feed resources and prevalence of diseases (Newcastle, coccidiosis, etc.) are among the constraints of backyard poultry production in Ethiopia [3].

Toxoplasma gondii is an obligate intracellular protozoan that infects humans and a wide range of mammals and birds [4]. Felines are the only definitive hosts that shed oocysts in their faeces, although intermediate hosts can harbour infective tissue cysts. Most feline infections occur post-natally through ingestion of infected tissue cysts or rarely oocysts, although congenital infections can occur [5].

Humans acquire T. gondi infections from ingestion of oocyst-contaminated soil and water, from tissue cysts in undercooked meat, by transplantation, blood transfusion, laboratory accidents, or congenitally [4, 6, 7]. The prevalence of Toxoplasma infection is estimated to range from 30% to 50% worldwide, but the majority of infected humans remain asymptomatic [6]. However, it should be noted that T. gondii infection may cause severe illness in immunodeficient people and pregnant women [4].

The prevalence of T. gondii infection in free-range chickens is a good indicator of the prevalence of T. gondii oocysts in the environment, due to the habits of chickens that feed by scratching the earth, which facilitates greater access to hidden faeces of cats [7]. Thus, free-range chickens play an important role in the epidemiology of T. gondii in the rural environment, perhaps more so than rodents, because chickens are clinically resistant to T. gondii and live longer than rodents. Moreover, T. gondii-infected chickens are an efficient source of infection for cats, because cats fed naturally infected chicken tissues may shed millions of oocysts [7, 8].

A thorough knowledge of the extent of contamination of the environment or areas surrounding human habitation by T. gondii oocysts is important for control purposes. In the developing world T. gondii seroprevalence in free-range chickens may be up to 65% and tissue cysts have been found in 81% of seropositive birds [9]. In Africa, little research has been conducted on T. gondii infection of free-range chickens. Lindstrom et al. [10] from Uganda, and Dubey et al. [11] from Ghana, report prevalences of 47% and 64% in chickens, respectively. The epidemiology of T. gondii infection in humans and animals is poorly understood in Ethiopia. Chickens are a good source of protein for humans and very much associated with food, economy, culture and religion [12], yet they pose a strong disease risk for humans via T. gondii. However, there seems to be only one previous study available regarding T. gondii status in Ethiopian chickens. That study was conducted in one area only (Addis Ababa) on free-range chickens and reported a prevalence of 38·2% from 125 chicken sera examined by modified agglutination test (MAT) and viable T. gondii was isolated from only 1/43 (2·3%) bioassayed seropositive chickens [13]. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the objective of estimating animal- and flock-level seroprevalence and assessing the potential risk factors associated with T. gondii infection in free-range chickens (Gallus domesticus) of East and West Shewa zones, Central Ethiopia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Description of the study area

The study was conducted in three selected districts (Ambo, Adea, Fentale) in East and West Shewa zones of Oromia Regional State, Central Ethiopia (Fig. 1). The study areas are separated from each other by 150–289 km and represent the highland [⩾2300 m above sea level (masl)], midland (1500–2300 masl) and lowland (<1500 masl) agro-ecologies of the region.

Fig. 1. Map showing the study districts highlighted in black. 1, Ambo; 2, Adea; 3, Fentale.

Ambo district (longitude 37° 32′ to 38° 3′ E; latitude 8° 47′ to 9° 20′ N) is located in Western Shewa Zone of Oromia Regional State. The altitude within the district ranges from 1400 to 3045 masl. The majority of the locations in Ambo district are highland. The range of annual rainfall and temperature is 800–1000 mm and 15–29 ^oC, respectively. The mean temperature is 18·6°C.

Adea district (longitude 38° 58′ E to 39° 22′ E; latitude 08° 22′ N to 8° 56′ N) and Fentale district (longitude 39·93° E to 39° 56′ 0″ E; latitude 8·975° N to 8·58′ 30″ N) are located in East Shewa Zone at a distance of 45 km and 190 km from Addis Ababa, respectively. The altitude of Adea district ranges from 1500 to >2000 masl, although the majority of the territory is midland. Its average rainfall is ~839 mm with temperature ranging from 7·9°C to 28°C.

Fentale district ranges in altitude from 955 to 2007 masl, but comprises mainly lowland. Its average rainfall and temperature are ~553 mm and 29–38°C, respectively. Fentale district has an arid to semi-arid climate and the production system is predominantly pastoral and agro-pastoral. Sedentary farming, dominated by an extensive type of management system, is a feature of the highlands and midlands of Ambo and Adea districts. However, semi-intensive farming is practised in some urban and peri-urban areas.

Study animal population and production system

Previous reports on T. gondii infection in sheep [14], goats [15] and women of childbearing age [16] from the same study districts initiated this investigation into the level of T. gondii oocyst contamination of the environment by using free-range chickens as indicators.

The biological characteristics and management properties of village chickens in Ethiopia have previously been well described [12, 17]. The chicken production systems in the selected districts are dominated by extensive/free-range system, where main feed sources are insects, worms, cereals and plants. In this system chickens are set free during the day and spend the night on perches in or around the main house.

Study design and sample size

A cross-sectional study design was conducted from October 2012 to May 2013 to estimate the seroprevalence and to identify the potential risk factors in the epidemiology of T. gondii infection in free-range chickens of the three study districts.

In the absence of any well-designed previous studies on chicken toxoplasmosis in Ethiopia, a 50% expected prevalence (p) and a 95% confidence interval (Z = 1·96) with a 5% desired absolute precision (d) was considered to arrive at the required sample size, using the formula: n = p(1−p)Z ²/d ²) [18]. However, the calculated sample size (n = 384) was increased to 601 for better accuracy. The total chicken population of the study area was 196 644. The required sample size was distributed on the basis of the chicken population of each respective district: Ambo (n = 286), Adea (n = 209) and Fentale (n = 109). The study ‘kebeles’ (kebele refers to the smallest administrative unit) from Ambo (n = 7), Adea (n = 5) and Fentale (n = 4) were chosen purposely based on accessibility. The average number of chickens per household in Ethiopia is 2–6 hens and 1–3 cocks [12, 17]. The lower ratio (i.e. 1 male : 2 females) was considered in order to sample three chickens per household using a simple random sampling technique. Accordingly, 88, 65 and 37 households were sampled from Ambo, Adea and Fentale districts, respectively. The households of selected kebeles were sampled by considering the relative distance from one cluster to another, since rural communities live in clusters. Finally, 2–3 households per cluster were sampled.

Questionnaire survey

A questionnaire survey was used to collect data regarding the potential risk factors including breed (local, cross, exotic), age (⩽6 months, 7–12 months, ⩾13 months), sex (male/female), flock size (small, ⩽4; medium, 5–10; large, ⩾11 chickens), management systems (extensive, semi-intensive, intensive), altitude (lowland, ⩽1400 masl; midland, 1500–2200 masl; highland ⩾2300 masl), presence of cat (yes/no), presence of dog (yes/no), presence of feral cat (yes/no), type of residence (rural/peri-urban), owner education (literate/illiterate) and water source (tap, river, pond, well). The questionnaire also included origin and housing of chickens, type of feed and housing for cat(s); and awareness and knowledge of the respondents about toxoplasmosis.

Sample collection and transportation

About 2–3 ml blood samples were collected from the wing vein of each chicken, using a disposable plain vacutainer tube and needle. Samples were labelled and placed in a slant position for a few minutes until clotting. Centrifugation at 2250 g for 5 min was performed for some sera which failed to separate overnight. The sera were collected in 1·5 ml Eppendorf tubes, labelled and transported in an ice box with ice packs to the Ethio-Belgium laboratory of the College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University, Debre-Zeit and stored at −20°C until tested.

MAT

All sera samples collected were examined for the presence of antibodies (IgG) against T. gondii by MAT (Toxo screen DA, bioMérieux, France) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Sera were assayed at a screening dilution of 1 : 40 and 1 : 4000. A titre of 1 : 40 or 1 : 4000 or both was considered indicative of T. gondii exposure. Sedimentation of antigen at the bottom of the well, and clear agglutination above half of the well at either dilution were recorded as negative and positive results, respectively. MAT-positive samples were titrated to obtain the endpoint titre. Positive and negative controls were included in each test.

Data management and analyses

The data generated from the field and laboratory investigations were entered and coded using Microsoft Excel 2007 and analysed using Stata v. 11.0 for Windows (StataCorp., USA). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Flocks containing at least one seropositive animal were considered positive. Seroprevalence was calculated by dividing the total number of seropositive chickens by the total number of chickens tested. Similarly, flock level seroprevalence was calculated as the number of flocks with at least one positive animal, divided by the total number of flocks tested. The variables considered as potential risk factors for T. gondii seropositivity were selected based on existing literature. During analyses, categories of variables, e.g. cross-breed and exotic breed, urban and peri-urban locations, intensive and semi-intensive management were merged. Association of risk factors (independent variables) with dependent variable (T. gondii seropositivity) was assessed initially using cross-tabulation. Strength of association was assessed using univariable logistic regression to compute the odds ratio associated with potential risk factors. Non-collinear variables, that presented a P value ⩽0·25 in univariable analyses, were included in the multivariable logistic regression model. In line with this, the sex, flock size, presence of feral cats and source of water were not entered in the animal-level multivariable model, due to a P value >0·25 in the univariable analyses, while feed was omitted for management due to collinearity. Similarly, during flock-level analysis, district was dropped from joining the model due to collinearity with altitude. Model fitness was assessed by the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test [19]. The receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the reliability of both individual- and flock-level models. The 95% confidence level was used and results were considered significant at P ⩽ 0·05.

RESULTS

Overall seroprevalence and antibody end titre in free-range chickens

The overall seroprevalence of T. gondii infection in the study districts were 30·5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26·76–34·14] and 54·2% (95% CI 47·06–61·36) at animal and flock level, respectively. The highest (animal level 41·4%, flock level 72·3%) and lowest (animal level 9·2%, flock level 21·6%) seroprevalences were recorded in chickens from Adea and Fentale districts, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in seroprevalence of T. gondii infection between districts, both at animal (χ ² ₂ = 34·9632, P ⩽ 0·001) and flock (χ ² ₂ = 24·4104, P ⩽ 0·001) levels.

Titration was conducted for each seropositive serum to evaluate the endpoint titre at which the MAT antibody is no longer detectable. Subsequently, 183/601 chickens were seropositive with an end titre of 1 : 60 in 46, 1 : 180 in 28, 1 : 540 in 29, ⩾1 : 1620 in 48, 1 : 6000 in 22, 1 : 18 000 in five, 1 : 54 000 in one, and ⩾1 : 162 000 in four.

Risk factors of T. gondii infection in free-range chickens

Animal level

The variables altitude, age, management, and presence of cats were all significant factors associated with T. gondii seropositivity in both univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses (P ⩽ 0·05). Presence of dogs and breed were significantly associated with T. gondii seropositivity only in univariable and multivariable logistic regression model, respectively (P ⩽ 0·05, Table 1).

Table 1. Results of logistic regression analysis of animal-level Toxoplasma gondii seropositivity in free-range chickens

N, Number tested; prev., prevalence; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; WBCS, wheat bran, cereals and supplements.

Flock level

Univariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the variables altitude, location, and presence of cats and dogs were all significantly associated (P ⩽ 0·05) with T. gondii seropositivity. However, only altitude and presence of cats were found to be independent predictors of seropositivity by the multivariable logistic regression model (Table 2). From the flock-level multivariable logistic regression model it was evident that not all factors were equally responsible as a risk factor for T. gondii seropositivity, implying that only some factors are sufficient risk factors. Table 3 shows the best-fitting model that contains all the appropriate risk factors for T. gondii seropositivity at both animal and flock levels.

Table 2. Results of logistic regression analyses of flock-level Toxoplasma gondii seropositivity in free-range chickens

N, Number tested; prev., prevalence; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; WBCS, wheat bran, cereals and supplements.

Table 3. Best-fitting model of risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii seropositivity in chickens

OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Animal level: Hosmer–Lemshow χ ² = 0.34, P = 0.95, receiver-operating characteristic curve = 0.68.

Flock level: Hosmer–Lemshow χ ² = 0·08, P = 0·96, receiver-operating characteristic curve = 0·71.

Respondents' awareness of T. gondii infection and its risk factors

From a total of 190 respondents interviewed, 95 (50·0%) owned domestic cats. Table 4 shows that 90·5% of respondents reported that their cats lived completely outdoors. All (100%) respondents indicated that the cats had no separate accommodation while 85·3% reported that the cats ate raw animal products as well as household leftovers. Most respondents do not have adequate knowledge about the health risk posed by cats to animals and humans. This health risk to animals showed no significant difference between districts (χ ² ₂ = 1·6161, P = 0·446). However, there was a significant difference with respect to awareness about health risks of cats to humans across districts, in that awareness was considerably higher in Fentale (37·8%) than Ambo (10·2%) and Adea (15·4%) districts (χ ² ₂ = 14·1072, P = 0·001). The sanitation of chicken houses was judged as poor in 93·7% of cases, while 97·9% of respondents reported that they did not have a separate house for chickens (free ranging during the day and spending the night on perches in or around the owners' home). Dead chickens were simply thrown into open fields by 72·1% of the respondents (Table 4).

Table 4. Awareness of respondents about the risks of cats to humans and animals, management of cats and chickens in the study areas (n = 95)

DISCUSSION

T. gondii occurs widely in humans and animals, including domestic poultry throughout the world. The distribution of T. gondii is believed to be best detected by using its levels of distribution in free-range chickens [7]. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first detailed report on seroprevalence and risk factors of T. gondii infection in free-range chickens in different agro-ecologies of Ethiopia. The choice of MAT as a diagnostic tool for the current study was made because of its high sensitivity (96·22%) and specificity (98·8%) in chickens compared to other serological tests [7, 20].

Overall seroprevalence

An overall animal- and flock-level seroprevalence of 30·5% and 54·2%, respectively, was documented. The highest animal-level (41·4%, 95% CI 34·62–48·06) and flock-level (72·3%, 95% CI 61·27–83·34) seroprevalences were recorded from Adea district while the lowest animal-level (9·2%, 95% CI 3·72–14·63) and flock-level (21·6%, 95% CI 8·09–35·16) seroprevalences were recorded from Fentale district. The variation in seroprevalence between districts can be defined by the difference in temperature, moisture and management practices across the studied districts.

The high overall animal-level seroprevalence of the present study is in agreement with the report of Tilahun et al. [13] from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (38·4%). The high seroprevalence of T. gondii in free-range chickens in the present study also corroborates well with the high prevalence of oocyst shedding (19%, 7/36) previously reported in feral cats which are commonly fed on dead avian carcases in Addis Ababa [21]. Surveys conducted in different countries around the world report prevalences of T. gondii infection in free-range chickens ranging between 5·5% and 100% [10, 22–24]. The differences in the seroprevalence observed between the current and above-mentioned studies may relate to differences in relative cat densities, management, study design, the number of chickens examined, sanitation, housing of chickens, type of serological tests used and the cut-off value reported [4, 7, 25].

Risk factors

Epidemiological data on risk factors of T. gondii infections in chickens are generally limited across the globe. In the present study, the potential risk factors of T. gondii infection in free-range chickens were assessed. Accordingly, altitude, presence of cats, age, management and breed were to a large degree associated with T. gondii seropositivity (P < 0·05), whereas risk factors like sex, location, presence of feral cats, education level of owner, type of feed, source of water and flock size did not show statistical association with T. gondi infection (P > 0·05).

The likelihood of acquiring T. gondii infection in chickens reared in the midland areas is twice that of chickens reared in lowland areas (P = 0·026). This may be due to the fact that the moist and warm macro-climate of midland areas supports survival of oocysts and its higher infection rate, compared to the dry and hot climate of lowland areas which decreases the survival and infection rate of T. gondii [4, 26]. Relatively lower seroprevalence has previously been reported in lowland sheep and goats compared to highland and midland areas [14, 15]. The influence of the environment on the epidemiology of toxoplasmosis has been well documented [20, 22, 26, 27].

The seroprevalence (45·8%) in older chickens was significantly higher than the seroprevalence in young chickens (21·6%, P < 0·001). This difference is partly due to an increase in the cumulative effect of exposure to the parasite by adult chickens, i.e. as the age of chickens increases the likelihood of encountering oocysts of T. gondii from the environment also increases [4]. There have been numerous reports indicating age-related increase in seroprevalence in chickens worldwide [26, 28].

The odds of acquiring T. gondii infection by chickens kept under an extensive management system was nearly seven times higher compared to chickens managed under semi-intensive and intensive management systems (P = 0·021). This variation may be explained by the fact that chickens kept under an extensive system are exposed to T. gondii oocysts shed by cats in the environment since chickens scratch the soil to collect feed, whereas chickens under intensive and semi-intensive management systems receive better hygiene and have limited or no access to the contaminated environment, since they are kept in confinement [4, 29]. The influence of management on seroprevalence of chicken toxoplasmosis has previously been well documented [30].

A significantly high seroprevalence of T. gondii infection in free-range chickens kept in areas where cats are present (P = 0·009) is obviously an indication of the dissemination of cat-originated oocysts in the soil close to the households. The frequent cohabitation of chickens with cats in the same environment was observed during sample collection. An increased risk of infection in the presence of cats has been reported by different studies [7, 26, 29].

Local breeds of chickens have been claimed to have better disease resistance than exotic breeds [2]. In this study, the likelihood of getting T. gondii infection by cross-bred and exotic-bred chickens (50·0%) was significantly higher than for locally bred chickens (29·3%, P = 0·006). A possible reason for increased risk of infection in the exotic and cross-breeds may be due to higher susceptibility to T. gondii infection or the preference of owners to keep these chicken breeds for a longer period as potential breeders for high production purposes, hence there is an increased chance of exposure to the possible source of infection [2, 8]. However, the role of breed in predisposing chickens to T. gondii infection needs further investigation.

With regard to the owners' awareness about the role cats play in the transmission of disease to humans and animals, 17·4% (33/190) of respondents reported association of cats in the transmission of diseases like asthma and parasites to humans, but none of the interviewed owners were aware of the health risk of cats to other animals. None of the respondents were aware of toxoplasmosis. Similarly, none of the respondents kept their cats in a separate house. Cats were fed with raw animal products like viscera of ruminants and chickens slaughtered for human consumption, and meat of dead animals, which might have T. gondii cysts, hence boosting the spread of toxoplasmosis. Moreover, 97·9% of respondents keep their stock free range (outdoors) during day-time hours and at night used a perch housing system, where the sanitation is poor (93%). Furthermore, about 92% of respondents used unsafe methods when disposing of chicken carcases (throw away into fields or fed to pets). Poor housing, feeding and management of free-range chickens and cats together with poor sanitation and the lack of awareness of toxoplasmosis create favourable conditions for the high prevalence of the disease and successful continuation of the life-cycle of the parasite in the study areas.

In view of home slaughtering of free-range chickens, limited refrigeration facilities and poor sanitation in Ethiopia in general, and the study districts in particular, the high seroprevalence in free-range chickens indicates a high likelihood of transmission to humans, unless chicken meat is well cooked and good kitchen sanitation is practised [7].

In conclusion, T. gondii antibodies are widespread in free-range chickens in Central Ethiopia suggesting high contamination of the living environment with oocysts of T. gondii and that the meat from free-range chickens may be an important source of infection for humans. Management, age, presence of cats, altitude and breed are epidemiologically important predictors for T. gondii seropositivity. The general absence of awareness of toxoplasmosis may play an important role in the epidemiology of the disease. Education of farmers about toxoplasmosis and further studies to elucidate the burden of toxoplasmosis in animals and humans warrants consideration.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The financial support of Addis Ababa University (Combating HIV/AIDS and promoting maternal and child health project) as well as the partial financial support to Maria Vitale (grant no. RF 2007/RC 2009 from the Italian Ministry of Health) are greatly appreciated. The study could not have been conducted without this support. We are grateful to Margareta Langbacka Walker, advisor and trainer in the English Language Improvement Centre at Ambo University, for her valuable comments on the language aspect. The authors also extend their gratitude to the owners of chickens for their collaboration during the study.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None

REFERENCES

1. Central Statistical Authority (CSA). Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Central Statistical Agency, Agricultural sample survey 2009/10. Report on livestock and livestock characteristics, Statistical Bulletin No. 468. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2009.

2. Tadelle, D, Kijora, C, Peters, KJ. Indigenous chicken ecotypes in Ethiopia: Growth and feed utilization potentials. International Journal of Poultry Science 2003; 2: 144–152.

3. Ashenafi, H, et al. Study on coccidiosis of scavenging indigenous chickens in central Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 2004; 36: 693–701.

4. Dubey, JP. Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Humans, 2nd edn. Florida: CRC Press. 2010, pp.1–338.

5. Dubey, JP, Jones, JL. Toxoplasma gondii infection in humans and animals in the United States. International Journal for Parasitology 2008; 38: 1257–1278.

6. El-Awady, MK, El-Hosseiny, LA, Ismail, SM. Comparison between Toxoplasma gondii and specific immunoglobulin's during pregnancy. East Mediterranean Health Journal 2000; 6: 888–897.

7. Dubey, JP. Toxoplasma gondii infections in chickens (Gallus domesticus): prevalence, clinical disease, diagnosis and public health significance. Zoonoses and Public Health 2010; 57: 60–73.

8. Dubey, JP, et al. Biological and genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from chickens (Gallus domesticus) from Sao Paulo, Brazil: unexpected findings. International Journal for Parasitology 2002; 32: 99–105.

9. Kijlstra, A, Jongert, E. Control of the risk of human toxoplasmosis transmitted by meat. International Journal for Parasitology 2008; 38: 1359–1370.

10. Lindstrom, I, et al. Isolation and genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii from Ugandan chickens reveals frequent multiple infections. Parasitology 2007; 135: 39–45.

11. Dubey, JP, et al. Seroprevalence and isolation of Toxoplasma gondii from free range chickens in Ghana, Indonesia, Italy, Poland, and Vietnam. Journal of Parasitology 2008; 94: 68–71.

12. Reta, D. Understanding the role of indigenous chicken during the long walk to food security in Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 2009; 21 (www.lrrd.org/lrrd21/8/dugu21116).

13. Tilahun, G, et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii from free-range chicken (Gallus domesticus) from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Journal of Parasitology 2013; 99: 740–741.

14. Gebremedhin, EZ, et al. Seroepidemiological study of ovine toxoplasmosis in East and West Shewa zones of Oromia regional state, central Ethiopia. BMC Veterinary Research 2013; 9: 117.

15. Zewdu, E, et al. Seroepidemiological study of caprine toxoplasmosis in East and West Shewa zones, Oromia regional state, central Ethiopia. Research in Veterinary Science 2013; 94: 43–48.

16. Gebremedhin, EZ, et al. Seroepidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii infection in women of child-bearing age in central Ethiopia. BMC Infectious Disease 2013; 13: 101–112.

17. Fisseha, M, Azage, T, Tadelle, D. Indigenous chicken production and marketing systems in Ethiopia: characteristics and opportunities for market-oriented development. International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2010, pp. 5–8.

18. Thrusfield, M. Veterinary Epidemiology, 3rd edn. London: Blackwell Science Ltd, 2007, pp. 227–247.

19. Dohoo, I, Martin, W, Stryhn, H. Veterinary Epidemiologic Research. Charlottetown, Canada: AVC Inc. 2003, pp. 521–539.

20. Dubey, JP, et al. Serologic and parasitologic responses of domestic chickens after oral inoculation with Toxoplasma gondii oocysts. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1993; 54: 1668–1672.

21. Dubey, JP, et al. Isolation of viable Toxoplasma gondii from tissues and feces of cats from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Journal of Parasitology 2013; 99: 56–58.

22. Dubey, JP. Toxoplasmosis – a waterborne zoonosis. Veterinary Parasitology 2004; 126: 57–72.

23. Dubey, JP. Unexpected oocyst shedding by cats fed Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites: in vivo stage conversion and strain variation. Veterinary Parasitology 2005; 133: 289–298.

24. Dubey, JP. The history and life cycle of Toxoplasma gondii . In: Weiss, LM, Kim, K, eds. Toxoplasma gondii. The Model Apicomplexan: Perspectives and Methods. New York: Academic Press, 2007, pp. 1–17.

25. Beltrame, MAV, et al. Seroprevalence and isolation of Toxoplasma gondii from free-range chickens from Espírito Santo state, southeastern Brazil. Veterinary Parasitology 2012; 188: 225–230

26. Tenter, AM, Heckeroth, AR, Weiss, LM. Toxoplasma gondii: from animals to humans. International Journal for Parasitology 2000; 30: 1217–1258.

27. Yang, N, et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in slaughtered chickens, ducks, and geese in Shenyang, northeastern China. Parasites & Vectors 2012; 5: 237.

28. Alvarado-Esquivel, C, et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Chickens in Durango State, Mexico. Journal of Parasitology 2012; 98: 431–432.

29. Zhu, J, et al. A seroepidemiological survey of Toxoplasma gondii infection in free range and caged chickens in northeast China. Veterinary Parasitology 2008; 158: 360–363.

30. Xu, P, et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in chickens in Jinzhou, northeastern China. Journal of Parasitology 2012; 98: 1300–1301.

Seroepidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii infection in free-range chickens (Gallus domesticus) of Central Ethiopia

Contents:

Information:

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

Figures:

Actions:

Summary

INTRODUCTION