Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:03:30.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Salmonella infections in Antarctic fauna and island populations of wildlife exposed to human activities in coastal areas of Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2008

J. B. IVESON*
Affiliation:
PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, QEII Medical Centre Site, Nedlands, Western Australia
G. R. SHELLAM
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia
S. D. BRADSHAW
Affiliation:
School of Animal Biology and Centre for Native Animal Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia
D. W. SMITH
Affiliation:
PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, QEII Medical Centre Site, Nedlands, Western Australia
J. S. MACKENZIE
Affiliation:
Australian Biosecurity CRC, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia
R. G. MOFFLIN
Affiliation:
PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, QEII Medical Centre Site, Nedlands, Western Australia
*
*Author for correspondence: Mr J. B. Iveson, PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, QEII Medical Centre Site, Nedlands 6009, Western Australia (Email: ivendt@iprimus.com.au)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Salmonella infections in Antarctic wildlife were first reported in 1970 and in a search for evidence linking isolations with exposure to human activities, a comparison was made of serovars reported from marine fauna in the Antarctic region from 1982–2004 with those from marine mammals in the Northern hemisphere. This revealed that 10 (83%) Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from Antarctic penguins and seals were classifiable in high-frequency (HF) quotients for serovars prevalent in humans and domesticated animals. In Australia, 16 (90%) HF serovars were isolated from marine birds and mammals compared with 12 (86%) HF serovars reported from marine mammals in the Northern hemisphere. In Western Australia, HF serovars from marine species were also recorded in humans, livestock, mussels, effluents and island populations of wildlife in urban coastal areas. Low-frequency S. enterica serovars were rarely detected in humans and not detected in seagulls or marine species. The isolation of S. Enteritidis phage type 4 (PT4), PT8 and PT23 strains from Adélie penguins and a diversity of HF serovars reported from marine fauna in the Antarctic region and coastal areas of Australia, signal the possibility of transient serovars and endemic Salmonella strains recycling back to humans from southern latitudes in marine foodstuffs and feed ingredients.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

INTRODUCTION

During the past century, sealing and whaling activities in the Southern Ocean, the use of dogs on expeditions to Antarctica, and introduction of rodents, rabbits, reindeer and domesticated animals to sub-Antarctic islands [Reference Holdgate and Wace1] have created man-made opportunities for the spread of exotic pathogens from the Northern hemisphere to marine fauna in previously isolated natural regions. Bay whalers from Europe and North America were active in southern coastal areas of Western Australia prior to settlement by the British in 1826, and this relatively recent translocation of humans and domesticated food animals to temperate coastal areas of the state provides an opportunity to gauge the impact of human activities on the indigenous fauna.

In recent decades the impact from sealing and whaling, has been replaced by the establishment of some 43 Antarctic bases operated by 18 countries, shore visits from cruise ships by tourists [Reference Enzenbacher2, Reference Curry3], the harvesting and processing of Antarctic krill [Reference Nicol, Forster, Spence and Everson4] (Euphausia superba), exposure to sewage effluent [Reference Meyer-Rochow5], food wastes and exotic pathogens [Reference Broman6] with the capacity to cause epizootics in wild birds [Reference Gardner, Kerry and Riddle7]. The risk of acquiring enteric infections from humans is greatest during the Austral summer when peak activities coincide with the group behaviour of marine species such as penguins and seals in coastal habitats and feeding areas. The need for studies designed to establish whether Salmonella enterica forms part of the normal microbial flora of colonies of penguins and seals located close to permanent bases is thus manifest [Reference Bonnedahl8].

Salmonella infections in Antarctic wildlife were first reported in 1970 [Reference Oelke and Steiniger9], and serovars S. Blockley, S. Infantis, S. Johannesburg and S. Panama were isolated from Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adélie) and S. Blockley and S. Typhimurium from south polar skuas (Catharacta maccormicki) at Cape Crozier on Ross Island. In studies in sub-Antarctica [Reference Palmgren10], S. Enteritidis phage type 4 (PT4), PT35, and PT4-like, S. Havana, S. Newport and S. Typhimurium were variously isolated from gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua), fur seal pups (Arctocephalus gazella) and a black-browed albatross (Thalassarche melanophrys). In studies on the sub-Antarctic Auckland islands [Reference Baker11], S. Cerro, S. Derby, S. Enteritidis PT4, PT8, and S. Newport were isolated from New Zealand sea lions (Phocarctos hookeri). S. Cerro and S. Newport were also isolated from feral pigs quarantined after removal from the islands [Reference Fenwick12].

In a comparison of S. enterica and Edwardsiella tarda isolates over a 30-year period from human effluents and indigenous fauna in tropical and temperate latitudes of Western Australia [Reference Iveson13], we proposed that serovars predominant in the epidemiology of salmonellosis in urban areas are strains mostly of European origin [Reference Iveson14] and have spilled over to the indigenous fauna on coastal islands causing public health problems [Reference Iveson and Bradshaw15]. Serovars classed as exotic were not isolated from indigenous species in pristine areas of the state [Reference How16]. Comparison of S. enterica and E. tarda infections in terrestrial and marine fauna in Australia with isolates from marine fauna in Antarctica and sub-Antarctica, provides an adjunct to more definitive biogeographical studies and assessments of the epidemiological significance of zoonotic infections translocated from the Northern hemisphere to geographically isolated natural regions.

The diversity of S. enterica serovars and phage types reported from Antarctic fauna conflicts with the principle of reduced natural biodiversity in polar and sub-polar latitudes, and with the exception of S. Antarctica [Reference Le Minor, Bockemühl and Rowe17], a new serovar isolated from an emperor penguin (Aptenodytes forsteri), and S. Johannesburg isolated from Adélie penguins on Ross Island, it was observed that Salmonella serovars reported from Antarctic fauna are listed in high-frequency (HF) quotients computed by Kelterborn [Reference Kelterborn18], for serovars prevalent in humans and domesticated animals. We have used regional comparisons of Salmonella frequencies previously in defining naturally occurring reservoirs of infection in remote tropical areas of Australia [Reference Iveson13], and the isolation of serovars classed in HF quotients from marine fauna in the Antarctic region, prompted this review of isolates and comparison of serovar frequencies with those recorded from humans, effluents and island population of wildlife in southern coastal areas of Australia.

The aims of this study were (1) to document the occurrence of Salmonella enterica infections in wildlife living in Antarctica and sub-Antarctic islands and to classify them as naturally occurring, or acquired as a consequence of exposure to humans and exotic animals; (2) to compare and contrast these data with samples taken from marine and terrestrial fauna occupying islands off the West Australian coast where both naturally occurring and exotic Salmonella infections are known to occur [Reference Iveson14].

METHODS

Collection of samples in Antarctica

Samples were collected by a number of workers over a period of 4 years from 1982 to 1986 involving two expeditions to Cape Denison in eastern Antarctica and six expeditions to four sub-Antarctic islands and regular trips to coastal islands in Western Australia. For logistic reasons it was not always possible to use the same sample preservation methods and the use of single and pooled swab samples collected in different transport media was adopted in expectation of low rates of Salmonella infection and for detection of E. tarda in a separate study [Reference Shellam19]. Single swabs and pools of up to four cloacal samples collected from different penguins at Cape Denison in eastern Antarctica and on four sub-Antarctic islands were transported without freezing in combinations of Robertson's cooked meat medium (RCM) and strontium chloride B (SCB) [Reference Iveson20]. A total of 502 adult Adélie penguins were sampled over consecutive breeding seasons at Cape Denison (67° 0′ S, 142° 40′ E) near the site of Mawson's Hut. Faecal samples and occasionally swabs from sleeping animals were also collected from 19 Weddell seals (Leptonychetes weddelli) and duplicate swabs were preserved in both RCM and SCB. A total of 718 samples from five other species of penguins (royal penguins, Eudyptes schlegeli, gentoo penguins Pygoscelis papua, king penguins Aptenodytes patagonicus, macaroni penguins Eudyptes chrysolphus and rockhopper penguins Eudyptes chrysocome), were collected in sub-Antarctica at locations on Macquarie Island (54° 37′ 53″ S, 158° 52′ 15″ E), Heard Island (73° 30′ E, 53° 05′ S), Kerguelen Island (49° 20′ S, 70° 20′ E) and Îles Crozet (45° 95′ to 46° 50′ S, 50° 33′ to 52° 58′ E). Faecal samples were also collected from elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) and mud wallow samples near Port-aux-Français on Kerguelen Island (49° 21′ S, 70° 13′ E). Samples from penguins were also collected at Pointe Molloy, Cape Cotter and Cape Ratmanoff (49° 13′ 58″ S, 70° 33′ 4″ E) The majority of samples collected in Antarctica were examined 1–2 months after collection.

Collection of samples from birds and marine life in coastal areas of Western Australia

In southern coastal areas of Western Australia, a total of 2550 single cloacal swabs were collected in SCB broth from eight species of marine birds at island breeding colonies bordering on the Southern and Indian Oceans. The sampling locations comprised the disturbed Carnac Island (32° 7′ 22″ S, 115° 39′ 49″ E), Rottnest Island (32° 0.5′ S, 115° 30.1′ E) and Penguin Island (32° 18′ 21″ S, 115° 41′ 27″ E) and Boullanger Island (30° 18′ 59″ S, 115° 00′ 20″ E) habitats close to urban coastal areas and the less disturbed, Sandy Island, Bald Island (34° 55′ 07″ S, 118° 27′ 44″ E), Abrolhos Island (28° 28′ 03″ S, 113° 13′ 12″ E) and Barrow Island (20° 47′ 57″ S, 115° 24′ 18″ E). The combined total of 947 cloacal swabs and 1537 droppings from silver gulls (Larus novaehollandiae) were collected from birds at mainland forage sites in Perth and Fremantle, and nearby breeding colonies of Carnac, Rottnest and Penguin islands. Gull droppings included samples from birds feeding on offal at a remote whaling station (closed since this study) during the flensing of sperm whales (Phyceter macrocephalus) captured in the Southern Ocean. Samples of mussels (Mytilus edulis) exposed to coastal effluents were examined prior to closing of abattoir facilities and resiting of sewage outfalls. Species of marine birds comprised little penguins (Eudyptes minor-novaehollandiae), flesh-footed shearwaters (Puffinis carneipes), wedge-tailed shearwaters (Puffinis pacificus), crested terns (Sterna bergeii), sooty terns (Sterna fuscata), bridled terns (Sterna anaethetus), white-faced storm petrels (Pelagodroma marina), lesser noddys (Anous tenuirostris) and common noddys (Anous stolidus). Marine mammals comprised Australian sea lions (Neophoca cinerea), false killer whales (Phoecaena crassidens) and bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus.) Sea snakes (Hydrophis major) were collected in nets during prawning operations in the Indian Ocean and cloacal samples were collected from them in the laboratory. Samples from marine mammals comprised fresh droppings from Australian sea lions, rectal swabs and intestinal content from stranded false killer whales and rectal samples from bottlenose dolphins. Samples from stranded marine mammals were transported in SCB and RCM to the laboratory.

Collection of samples from terrestrial fauna of islands in Western Australia

Samples collected in Western Australia from island populations of terrestrial fauna close to urban coastal areas comprised king skinks (Egernia kingii) and tiger snakes (Notechis scutatus) on Carnac Island, king skinks on Penguin Island, king skinks, bobtail lizards (Tiliqua rugosa), dugite snakes (Pseudonaja affinis) and marsupial quokkas (Setonix brachyurus) on Rottnest Island and skinks (Egernia multiscutata, Egernia pulchra, Ctenotus fallens), the marsupial dunnart (Sminthopsis griseoventor) and dibbler (Parantechinus apicalis) on Boullanger Island close to the Jurien Bay townsite. Samples from reptiles and marsupials were also collected on the less disturbed Wallabi Islands in the Abrolhos group and Barrow Island.

Collection of fishmeal samples

Commencing in 1985 and continuing sporadically until 1991, samples of imported fishmeal from producers in South America and the South Pacific region, were examined for evidence of Salmonella contamination prior to blending with locally produced meat meals.

Cultivation of samples and identification of serovars

Cloacal swabs from Antarctic birds and faeces from seals were pre-enriched in buffered peptone water (BPW) for 24 h at 37°C and subcultured in SCB enrichment broth incubated for 48 h at 43°C, with 37°C as a control. After enrichment, samples were plated onto deoxycholate citrate agar (DCA) and bismuth sulphite agar (BSA) at 24 h and 48 h. Selected samples from each batch were plated after pre-enrichment onto McConkey agar as a guide to the survival of target and indicator organisms prior to testing. Suspect colonies were screened in a single-tube Glissuda biochemical test medium (Iveson's medium), a single-tube method developed in our laboratory. This method detects glucose, lactose, sucrose, sorbose and dulcitol fermentation as well as the production of urea and hydrogen sulphide. After 14–16 h, tubes showing negative reactions are discarded and growth on the Glissuda slope is used for slide agglutination. The medium was developed for the economical and rapid screening of suspect colonies and provides a unique colour reaction indicating the presence of pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae. Other methods used for the isolation of S. enterica from humans, animals, waters and effluents and selected data used in this paper have been reported previously [Reference Iveson13, Reference Iveson20]. Notifications of S. enterica isolations from marine fauna in other states of Australia by the National Enteric Pathogens Surveillance Scheme (NEPSS) are included with the permission of the editors.

RESULTS

A total of nine isolates of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis were recorded from 94 cloacal swabs collected in RCM and two from swabs collected in SCB. These PT4, PT8 and PT23 strains were recorded from 298 (3%) Adélie penguins during the first visit to Cape Denison in January 1985. No Salmonella isolates were recorded from 204 penguins sampled at the same site in December of that year. S. Oranienburg was isolated from one sample of pooled cloacal swabs collected from 80 king penguins sampled on Îles Crozet in February 1986.

Plesiomonas shigelloides was identified in eight (7.5%) cloacal swab samples collected in Stuart's transport medium (STM) from penguins on Macquarie Island. No isolates of S. enterica were recorded from samples collected in STM.

S. enterica serovars isolated from seagulls, marine birds and marine mammals in urban and non-urban coastal areas of Western Australia are presented in Table 1. Infection rates in urban areas averaged 17.85%, compared with only 2·61% in non-urban areas, the difference being highly statistically significant (χ2=227·42, P<0·0001). Salmonella isolates from marine fauna in the Antarctic region, the Northern hemisphere and Australia; international frequency quotients, somatic groups and isolates common to humans, domesticated food animals, sewage, effluents, and coastal mussels in Western Australia are presented in Table 2. Salmonella serovars classed in HF groups identified in reptiles and marsupials cohabiting with marine fauna on coastal islands are presented in Table 3, and S. enterica serovars classed as naturally occurring in low-frequency quotients, are presented in Table 4. Salmonella isolates from marine birds and mammals in coastal areas are listed in Table 5.

Table 1. Salmonella isolations from seagulls, marine birds and marine mammals in urban and non-urban coastal areas of Western Australia

Table 2. Salmonella serovar frequency quotients, somatic groups and isolations from humans, marine fauna, livestock and coastal effluents

* NEPSS Notifications, Annual Reports (ed. Powling J, Lightfoot D) [Reference Powling and Lightfoot28].

Fenwick et al. [Reference Fenwick12].

Isolates from coastal mussels given in parentheses; F, frequent; MF, most frequent; U, uncommon; VR, very rare.

Table 3. Salmonella serovars, high-frequency quotients and isolations from reptiles (R) and marsupials (M) on coastal islands in Western Australia

F, Frequent; MF, most frequent.

Table 4. Salmonella serovars, somatic groups, frequency quotients, and isolations from reptiles (R) and marsupials (M) on coastal islands in Western Australia

R, Rare; U, uncommon; VR, very rare.

Table 5. Salmonella isolations from marine mammals and birds in Western Australia

A total of 20 HF Salmonella serovars classed in HF quotients were isolated from 22 (52%) samples of imported fishmeal processed in the Southern Ocean and South Pacific region. Serovars comprised S. Anatum, S. Binza, S. Cerro, S. Cubana, S. Derby, S. Havana, S. Infantis, S. Johannesburg, S. Mbandaka, S. Montevideo, S. Muenster, S. Orion, S. Ohio, S. Oranienburg, S. Schwarzengrund, S. Senftenberg, S. Singapore, S. Stanley, S. Tennessee and S. Thomasville.

DISCUSSION

In recent decades, increases in the volume of effluent from Antarctic bases and the harvesting and pelagic processing of fin fish and krill has expanded human activities impacting on coastal habitats and feeding areas and increased the risk of the marine food chain becoming involved in the epidemiology of salmonellosis. The isolation of S. Enteritidis PT4, PT8 and PT23 strains from Adélie penguins at Cape Denison preceded the pandemic of PT4 infections traced in many countries to reservoirs of infection in poultry flocks [Reference Rodrigue, Tauxe and Rowe21]. The subsequent isolation of S. Enteritidis PT4 from gentoo penguins on Bird Island, South Georgia was reported in a note by Olsen et al. [Reference Olsen22]. The isolation of the previously rare S. Johannesburg from penguins on Ross Island [Reference Palmgren10] also preceded isolates from samples of poultry feed and chicks in Canada [Reference Rigby23], poultry products in the United Kingdom [Reference McCoy and Barnum24], and a major outbreak of human infection in Hong Kong over the period 1971–1974 [Reference Chau and Huang25].

Australia was not included in the list of countries directly associated with the S. Enteritidis pandemic [Reference Rodrigue, Tauxe and Rowe21], and the majority of S. Enteritidis PT4 infections in Western Australia in the 1980s were reported from travellers and immigrants arriving from Asian countries. S. Johannesburg isolates reported by NEPSS in Australia at this time were mainly from pigs, pig meats, the milk-processing industry and occasionally from fishmeal imported from South America and South Pacific countries. Occasional non-human isolates of S. Enteritidis in Western Australia have been reported from rodents, reptiles and coastal sewage effluent [Reference Iveson13].

No event or food vehicle linking S. Enteritidis infections in Adélie penguins at Cape Denison with the history of human activities in the Terre Adélie region has been established and, apart from brief visits by survey parties, occasional cruise ships and the collection of samples during the Operation Blizzard Conservation project, the Commonwealth Bay area has remained free from major human disturbance since Cape Denison served as an operations base for Mawson and his sledge-dogs during the 1911–1914 Australian Antarctic Expedition.

A permanent base was established at Dumont d'Urville some 50 km from Commonwealth Bay in 1956 [Reference Rubin26], and during the summer breeding season the convergence of penguins and seals feeding on Antarctic krill presents opportunities for the recruitment and foodborne spread of S. enterica and E. tarda infections carried by species exposed more directly to human activities. Antarctic krill has the capacity to act as an intermediate host for pathogenic organisms [Reference Nicol, Forster, Spence and Everson4] and krill swarms exposed to factory ships and convergent wildlife provide a marine staging post and vehicle for the spread of Salmonella infections to penguin chicks and seal pups during the breeding season. Infections with Salmonella serovars adapted to the breeding cycle of Antarctic birds may also remain dormant for long periods in carrier hosts, and transfer internally via the reproductive system from infected parent bird to chick embryo, thereby avoiding the external route as demonstrated by S. Enteritidis PT4 infections in poultry flocks [Reference Timoney27].

The possibility of host-adapted Salmonella infections in Antarctic penguins exhibiting a winter breeding cycle is suggested by the isolation of S. Antarctica, a new O group D1 serovar related antigenically to S. Enteritidis from an emperor penguin [Reference Le Minor, Bockemühl and Rowe17]. Other somatic group D1 serovars isolated from marine species in Australia reported by NEPSS, comprise S. Enteritidis PT1 from an Australian fur seal in Victoria (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferis) [Reference Powling and Lightfoot28], and S. Wangata from little penguins in New South Wales also reported by NEPSS. In Western Australia, S. Panama, a serovar rare in Australia, was isolated from little penguins on Bald Island [Reference Hart, Bradshaw and Iveson29], sea lions examined during an oil spill off the southern coast of Western Australia, and S. 9,12:b:z57 isolated from sea snakes.

Salmonella enterica infections in Adélie penguins were not detected over consecutive breeding seasons at Cape Denison. Failure to isolate salmonellae during the second visit may reflect the small sample quota in a single rookery, or a fall in the number of orga isms excreted by carrier birds to below the level critical for their isolation by the swab procedure [Reference Hart, Bradshaw and Iveson29]. Cloacal rinse samples have been shown to increase Salmonella isolations from seagulls [Reference Fenlon30], and in coastal areas of Australia 21% of isolations were recorded from gull droppings, compared with 8% of gulls positive by the single cloacal swab procedure. The utilization of molecular biology techniques, such as PCR, could be appropriate in such circumstances.

The isolation of three S. Enteritidis phage types from nine infected penguins in a single rookery at Cape Denison suggests birds may act as both silent carriers and intermittent excretors during the breeding season in other colonies in the Commonwealth Bay area. Increases in infection rates may occur as a response to population stress induced by adverse conditions or an epizootic triggered by parent birds exposed to processing effluents and unregulated wastes from ships discharged in feeding areas.

The diversity of commonly occurring serovars isolated from fishmeal produced in southern latitudes was a surprise finding and warrants further study of fish offal and krill processed for use as animal feed. The possibility that an unsuspected vehicle or new technology has in recent decades selected for the emergence and international spread of virulent S. Enteritidis PT4 strains has been considered [Reference Tauxe and Seeds31]. Sealing, whaling and fishing activities have impacted on the Antarctic food chain for over a century and selected serovars and strains may be a legacy of past exposure to the insanitary practices of sealers and whalers, and in recent decades, to factory ships observed on krill swarms in feeding areas used by tagged seals [Reference Laws32].

A cause-and-effect relationship between Salmonella infections in marine species and exposure to shipping activities has not been established. In the Northern hemisphere, food and waterborne disease outbreaks due to contamination with S. Typhi, S. Enteritidis and other HF serovars have occurred in passengers and crew on cruise ships [Reference Merson33], and it is possible that, during outbreaks, pathogens may spill over to the marine environment during the unregulated discharge of contaminated wastes. In Australia, S. Typhi infections were notified by NEPSS in passengers on a cruise ship returning from Papua New Guinea and S. Enteritidis PT21 from air crew arriving in Australia after a stopover in Sri Lanka.

In Western Australia, birds and marine mammals frequenting port facilities, coastal waters and feeding areas, are exposed to ships transporting livestock to countries in the Middle East and Asia. Evidence suggesting exposure to wastes, and sheep carcases discarded offshore into the marine environment, was provided by the isolation of S. Adelaide, S. Bovismorbificans, S. Derby, S. Havana and S. Typhimurium from marine birds feeding in shipping lanes and in the wake of ships. Salmonella isolates from clinical cases and sheep fatalities were recorded during on-board veterinary investigations [Reference Jelinek, Franklin and Iveson34] and S. Bovismorbificans, the major isolate from sheep, was present in island populations of flesh-footed shearwaters, common noddys, lesser noddys, bridled terns, sooty terns, seagulls, pelicans and green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas). In 1986 about 76 000 sheep died during loading and transportation [Reference Richards35]. Disposal of carcases, feed and droppings overboard exposes marine birds, and whales during seasonal migrations, to serovars causing clinical infections and fatalities in livestock.

Marine mammals have been implicated in the epidemiology of salmonellosis, and in Japan, S. Enteritidis was isolated from humans consuming meat products prepared from a sick bottlenose whale (Hyperaodon rostratum) [Reference Nakaya36]. Whale meat was implicated in a major outbreak of S. Enteritidis infections in an Eskimo community in Alaska [Reference Bender37]. Salmonella serovars active in the epidemiology of salmonellosis in humans and livestock were also isolated from imported whale meals in the United Kingdom [Reference Taylor38] and from imported fishmeal contaminated with S. Agona implicated in an international outbreak of salmonellosis in humans and livestock [Reference McConnell39].

Isolations of S. Enteritidis recorded from marine mammals in the Northern hemisphere include fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) in Alaska [Reference Jellison and Milner40] and on San Miguel Island in California [Reference Gilmartin, Vainck and Neill41]. S. Enteritidis PT7, PT8, S. Newport, and E. tarda were isolated during post mortems on seals in California [Reference Thornton, Nolan and Gulland42] and from stranded sea lions (Zalophus californianus) near Los Angeles [Reference Schroeder43]. S. Enteritidis was implicated in a fatal case of meningoencephalitis in a northern fur seal on St George Island, Alaska [Reference Stroud and Roelke44]. Other commonly occurring serovars variously reported from pinnipeds in the United Kingdom [Reference Baker45], Hawaii, Japan and New Zealand [Reference Minette46] comprise S. Adelaide, S. Bovismorbificans, S. Havana, S. Newport and S. Typhimurium. All these serovars were variously isolated from humans, effluents, domesticated animals and island populations of wildlife in urban coastal areas of Australia.

An exception to the close relationship between salmonellae in humans, livestock, coastal effluents and marine fauna, was provided by the isolation of S. 4,12:a,:- from the tissues of stranded and deceased harbour porpoises (Phocaena phocaena) in coastal areas of Scotland [Reference Foster, Patterson and Munro47]. Infections were restricted to harbour porpoises and the majority of isolates were recorded from lung tissues infested with nematodes. It was suggested that parasites may act selectively as intermediate hosts and vehicles maintaining circles of infection in seal family groups. It is also possible that other hosts not previously tested may be involved in maintaining infections. Trematodes have been linked with long-term Salmonella infection in humans, and episodes of bacteraemia [Reference Young, Higashi and Kamel48].

Seals foraging in coastal habitats in Antarctica and sub-Antarctica may contribute to numbers of faecal indicator organisms in seawater and effluents from Antarctic bases [Reference Lisle49]. Testing of sewage effluent and kitchen wastewaters for S. enterica and E. tarda using Moore swab samples collected and cultured in SCB broth alongside routine procedures, may assist in defining input levels from marine fauna (mammals and birds) with access to coastal waters receiving sewage effluent and kitchen waste waters from coastal bases.

Public health problems associated with sewage disposal, contaminated surface melt waters and processing of crustaceans, have been reported from Arctic settlements in Greenland [Reference Boggild50], and similar problems may follow in the wake of expanding human activities in the Antarctic region. Further regulations limiting ship-to-shore excursions by tourists, discharge of wastes from ships, pelagic processing of marine foodstuffs in feeding areas south of the Antarctic convergence, and testing of coastal effluents during the Austral summer [Reference Howington51, Reference Statham and McMeckin52] are measures consistent with maintaining biological integrity in the Antarctic food web. Such measures are needed in order to limit the spill-over of Salmonella serovars active in the global epidemiology of salmonellosis to penguin and seal colonies.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Investigations at Cape Denison, Macquarie Island and Heard Island were conducted under the auspices of the Australian National Antarctic Research Expeditions (ANARE) and on Crozet and Kerguelen Islands with a grant and support from Terres Australes et Antarctiques Françaises (Government of France). Sampling and laboratory processing of specimens collected in Antarctica and coastal areas of Australia were funded jointly by the Health Department of Western Australia and the Department of Zoology, University of Western Australia. The authors acknowledge with gratitude Ross Vining and William Blunt, team members of Operation Blizzard and Steve Tramont for collection of samples at Cape Denison and Heard Island, and Grahame Budd who collected samples on Crozet and Kerguelen Islands; Hugh Jones for his contribution, Chris Dickman for the collection of samples from Boullanger Island and Richard Curtis for laboratory and field work at the former Public Health Enteric Diseases Unit, Western Australia. The authors thank Dr Diane Lightfoot of the Microbiological Diagnostic Unit, University of Melbourne, Victoria for phage typing S. Enteritidis strains, Joan Powling for information from the NEPSS Annual Reports, Chris Murray from the National Salmonella Reference Laboratory, Adelaide, for confirming S. enterica serovars, and Robyn Wylie and Diane Nielson for assistance with the manuscript and reference reports.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1. Holdgate, MW, Wace, MN. The influence of man on the flora and faunas of southern islands. Polar Record 1961; 10: 475493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Enzenbacher, DJ. Tourists in Antarctica: numbers and trends. Polar Record 1992; 28: 1722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Curry, CH, et al. Could tourist boots act as vectors for disease transmission in Antarctica? Journal of Travel Medicine 2002; 9: 190193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Nicol, S, Forster, I, Spence, J. Products derived from krill. In: Everson, Ied. Krill Biology Ecology and Fisheries. Blackwell Science, 2000, pp. 262283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Meyer-Rochow, VB. Observations on an accidental case of raw sewage pollution in Antarctica. Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie Mikrobiologie und Hygiene Serie B: Umwelthygiene Krankenhaushygiene Arbeitshygiene Praeventive Medizin 1992; 192: 554558.Google Scholar
6. Broman, T, et al. Isolation and characterisation of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni strains from macaroni penguins (Eudyptes chrysolphus) in sub-Antarctica. Applied Environmental Microbiology 2000; 66: 449452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Gardner, H, Kerry, K, Riddle, M. Poultry virus infection in Antarctic penguins. Nature 1997; 387: 245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Bonnedahl, J, et al. In search of human associated bacterial pathogens in Antarctic wildlife: Report from six penguin colonies regularly visited by tourists. Ambio 2005; 34: 430432.Google Scholar
9. Oelke, H, Steiniger, F. Salmonella in adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adélie) and south polar skua (Catharacta maccormicki) on Ross Island, Antarctica. Avian Diseases 1973; 17: 568573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Palmgren, H, et al. Salmonella in Sub-Antarctica: low heterogeneity in salmonella serotypes in South Georgian seals and birds. Epidemiology and Infection 2000; 125: 257262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Baker, A(ed.). Unusual mortality of the New Zealand sea lion, Phocarctos hookeri Auckland Island January–February 1998. Workshop Report. Department of Conservation and Environment, Wellington, New Zealand, 84 pp.Google Scholar
12. Fenwick, SG, et al. A comparison of Salmonella serotypes isolated from New Zealand Sea lions and feral pigs on the Auckland Islands by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 2004; 40: 566570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Iveson, JB, et al. Salmonella and Edwardsiella isolations from humans, animals, waters and effluents in tropical and temperate latitudes of Australia. Health Department of Western Australia – Occasional Paper 1991; 42: 154.Google Scholar
14. Iveson, JB. Regional aspects of salmonella in humans, livestock, feral animals and wildlife in Western Australia. Western Australian Health Surveyor 1983; 3: 521.Google Scholar
15. Iveson, JB, Bradshaw, SD. Salmonella javiana infection in an infant associated with a marsupial, the quokka (Setonix brachyurus). Journal of Hygiene 1973; 71: 423432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. How, RA, et al. The natural history of Salmonellae in mammals of the tropical Kimberely region, Western Australia. Ecology of Disease 1983; 2: 932.Google Scholar
17. Le Minor, L, Bockemühl, J, Rowe, B. Supplement No. XXII au schema de Kauffman-White. Annales de Microbiologie (Institut Pasteur) 1979; 130B: 191195.Google Scholar
18. Kelterborn, E. On the frequency of occurrence of salmonella species. An analysis of 1·5 million strains of salmonellae isolated in 109 countries during the period 1935–1975. Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie Mikrobiologie und Hygiene Series A: Medical Microbiology Infectious Diseases, Virology, Parasitology 1979; 243: 289307.Google Scholar
19. Shellam, G, et al. a study of viral, bacterial and protozoal infections in Macquarie Island penguins. Biological Sciences Australian National Antarctic Research Expedition Report, ANARE News August 1983; 28: 1.Google Scholar
20. Iveson, JB. Strontium chloride B and E.E. enrichment broth media for the isolation of Edwardsiella, Salmonella and Arizona species from tiger snakes. Journal of Hygiene 1971; 69: 323330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Rodrigue, DC, Tauxe, RV, Rowe, B. International increase in Salmonella Enteritidis: a new pandemic? Epidemiology and Infection 1990; 105: 2127.Google Scholar
22. Olsen, B, et al. Salmonella Enteritidis in Antarctica: zoonosis in man or humanosis in penguins? Lancet 1996; 348: 13191320.Google Scholar
23. Rigby, CE, et al. Flock infection and transport as sources of salmonellae in broiler chickens and carcasses. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 1980; 44: 328337.Google Scholar
24. McCoy, JH. An overview of human: Human salmonellosis: the poultry reservoir. In: Barnum, DAed. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Salmonella and Prospects for Control, 8–11 June, 1997. University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 1977, pp. 2740.Google Scholar
25. Chau, PT, Huang, CT. Salmonellosis in Hong Kong. Public Health, London 1977; 91: 8389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Rubin, J. Antarctica, 2nd edn. Lonely Planet Publications, 2000, pp. 338340.Google Scholar
27. Timoney, JF, et al. Egg transmission after infection of hens with Salmonella Enteritidis phage type 4. Veterinary Record 1989; 125: 600601.Google ScholarPubMed
28. Powling, J, Lightfoot, D(eds.). NEPSS Non-Human Annual Report 1999; 6: 112.Google Scholar
29. Hart, RP, Bradshaw, SD, Iveson, JB. Salmonella infections and animal condition in the mainland and Bald Island populations of the quokka (Setonix brachyurus Marsupialia). Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 1986; 69: 711.Google Scholar
30. Fenlon, DR. Seagulls (Larus sp.) as vectors of salmonella: an investigation into the range of serotypes and numbers of salmonella in gull faeces. Journal of Hygiene 1981; 86: 195202.Google Scholar
31. Tauxe, RV. Salmonella Enteritidis: the continuing public health challenge. XI–XIII. Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis in humans and animals. In: Seeds, AMed. Epidemiology Pathogenosis and Control. Iowa University Press, 1999, vol. 1, pp. 318.Google Scholar
32. Laws, L. Antarctica: a convergence of life. New Scientist 1983; 99: 608616.Google Scholar
33. Merson, MH, et al. Food and waterborne disease outbreaks on passenger cruise vessels and aircraft. Journal of Milk and Food Technology 1976; 39: 285288.Google Scholar
34. Jelinek, PD, Franklin, DA, Iveson, JB. The recovery of salmonella from sheep that die during transportation by sea. Australian Veterinary Journal 1982; 58: 170171.Google Scholar
35. Richards, RB, et al. Causes of death in sheep exported live by sea. Australian Veterinary Journal 1989; 66: 3338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Nakaya, R. Salmonella Enteritidis in a whale. Japan Medical Journal 1950; 3: 279280.Google Scholar
37. Bender, TR, et al. Salmonellosis associated with whale meat in an Eskimo community. Serologic and bacteriologic methods as adjuncts to an epidemiologic investigation. American Journal of Epidemiology 1972; 96: 153160.Google Scholar
38. Taylor, J, et al. Sources of salmonella 1951–1963. Part 1. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 1965; 24: 164280.Google Scholar
39. McConnell, Clark G, et al. Epidemiology of an international outbreak of Salmonella agona. Lancet 1973; 490: 3.Google Scholar
40. Jellison, WL, Milner, KC. Salmonellosis (bacillary dysentery) of fur seals. Journal of Wildlife Management 1958; 22: 199200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. Gilmartin, WG, Vainck, PM, Neill, VM. Salmonellae in feral pinnipeds off the southern Californian coast. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 1979; 15: 511514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Thornton, SM, Nolan, S, Gulland, FM. Bacterial isolates from Californian sea lions (Zalophus californianus), harbour seals (Phoca vitulina), and northern elephant Seals (Mirounga angustirostris) admitted to a rehabilitation centre along the central California coast, 1994–1995. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 1998; 29: 171176.Google Scholar
43. Schroeder, RJ, et al. Marine mammal disease surveillance programme in Los Angeles County. Journal of the American Veterinary Association 1973; 163: 581591.Google ScholarPubMed
44. Stroud, RK, Roelke, ME. Salmonella meningoencephalomyelitis in a northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus). Journal of Wildlife Diseases 1980; 16: 1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45. Baker, JR, et al. Isolation of Salmonella from seals in U.K. waters. Veterinary Record 1995; 136: 471472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46. Minette, HP. Salmonellosis in the marine environment a review and commentary. International Journal of Zoonoses 1986; 13: 7175.Google Scholar
47. Foster, G, Patterson, IAP, Munro, DS. Monophasic group B Salmonella species infecting harbour porpoises (Phocaena phocaena) inhabiting Scottish coastal waters. Veterinary Microbiology 1999; 65: 227231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48. Young, SW, Higashi, G, Kamel, R. Schistosomes as vehicles of salmonella infection. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1973; 67: 437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49. Lisle, JT, et al. Occurrence of microbial indicators and Clostridium perfringens in wastewater, water column samples, sediments, drinking water and weddell seal faeces collected at McMurdo Station Antarctica. Applied Environmental Microbiology 2004; 70: 72697276.Google Scholar
50. Boggild, J. Hygienic problems in Greenland. Archives of Environmental Health 1969; 18: 138143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51. Howington, JP, et al. Distribution of the McMurdo Station sewage plume. Marine Pollution Bulletin 1992; 25: 912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52. Statham, JA, McMeckin, TA. Survival of faecal bacteria in Antarctic coastal waters. Antarctic Science 1994; 6: 333338.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Salmonella isolations from seagulls, marine birds and marine mammals in urban and non-urban coastal areas of Western Australia

Figure 1

Table 2. Salmonella serovar frequency quotients, somatic groups and isolations from humans, marine fauna, livestock and coastal effluents

Figure 2

Table 3. Salmonella serovars, high-frequency quotients and isolations from reptiles (R) and marsupials (M) on coastal islands in Western Australia

Figure 3

Table 4. Salmonella serovars, somatic groups, frequency quotients, and isolations from reptiles (R) and marsupials (M) on coastal islands in Western Australia

Figure 4

Table 5. Salmonella isolations from marine mammals and birds in Western Australia