Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-wgjn4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T09:02:19.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The relative potencies of heat-killed and acetone-killed vaccines against Salmonella typhimurium in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Sujatha Cronly-Dillon
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology, University of Edinburgh
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Mice were immunized against Salmonella typhimurium with graded doses of heat-killed (HK) and acetone-killed (AK) vaccines and then challenged by the oral or intraperitoneal routes with two doses of S. typhimurium. HK and AK vaccines gave good protection against an intraperitoneal challenge, but failed to protect against an oral challenge which is presumably the natural mode of infection. HK vaccine was as potent as AK vaccine in reducing the mortality rate among mice challenged by the intraperitoneal route but, unlike HK vaccine, AK vaccine was also able to reduce the infectivity rate. With a small intraperitoneal challenge dose it was observed that a gradual increase in vaccine dose is associated with a corresponding fall in mortality rate, but with a larger challenge dose an increase in vaccine dose was associated with a corresponding increase in mortality rates. It was concluded that the protective potency of this type of vaccine may partly depend upon the total amount of antigen in the animal, i.e. including both the vaccine and the challenge organisms, at a critical time after challenge.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

References

REFERENCES

Cronly-Dillon, S. (1972). Comparative efficacy of whole and disintegrated killed vaccines against Salmonella typhimurium in mice. Journal of Medical Microbiology 5, 183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobson, D. (1957 a). Resistance to reinfection in experimental mouse typhoid. Journal of Hygiene 55, 334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobson, D. (1957 b). Chronic bacterial carriage in survivors of experimental mouse typhoid. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 73, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, D. R. E. (1954). Immunity to salmonella infection in mice. Journal of Hygiene 52, 9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, A. A. & Misra, S. S. (1938). The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. Journal of Hygiene 38, 732.Google ScholarPubMed
Raistrick, H. & Topley, W. W. C. (1934). Immunizing fractions isolated from Bact. aertrycke. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 15, 113.Google Scholar
Rowley, D. (1963). In Symposium on Bacterial Endotoxins (ed. Landy, and Braun, ), p. 359Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Topley, W. W. C., Greenwood, M. & Wilson, J. (1931). A strain of Bact. aertrycke with unusual epidemic characters. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 34, 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topley, W. W. C., Wilson, J. & Lewis, E. R. (1925). Immunisation and selection as factors in herd resistance. Journal of Hygiene 23, 421.Google ScholarPubMed