Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T17:04:45.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of pH of the culture medium on the sensitivity of Mycoplasma gallisepticum antigens for use in certain serological tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Janet M. Bradbury
Affiliation:
Poultry Research Section, University of Liverpool Veterinary Field Station, ‘Leahurst’, Neston, Wirral, Cheshire L64 7TE
F. T. W. Jordan
Affiliation:
Poultry Research Section, University of Liverpool Veterinary Field Station, ‘Leahurst’, Neston, Wirral, Cheshire L64 7TE
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Mycoplasma gallisepticum antigens were prepared from organisms cultured in broth medium with glucose. The influence of period of growth, pH of the medium and duration of incubation at low pH (5·0) on the sensitivity of these antigens was determined in certain tests. The most sensitive antigen for the serum plate test was harvested after no more than 8 hr. incubation at pH 5·0. Sensitivity in serum plate, haemagglutination and gel diffusion tests was impaired if organisms were incubated at pH 5·0 for long periods. Antigens prepared from buffered broth medium were found to be at least as sensitive as those from unbuffered medium for the haemagglutination and gel precipitation tests, but considerably less so for the serum plate test.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

References

REFERENCES

Adler, H. E. & DaMassa, A. (1965). Antigenicity of six isolates of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Avian Diseases 9, 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, H. E. & DaMassa, A. J. (1968). Effect of dextrose in the medium for the preparation of Mycoplasma gallisepticum plate antigens. Applied Microbiology 16, 558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, D. R. (1969). The Mycoplasmatales and the L-phase of bacteria, p. 391, edited by Hayflick, L., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Barber, C. W. (1962). An evaluation of PPLO agglutination antigens for the detection of PPLO agglutinins in turkey sera 1957–60. Avian Diseases 6, 349.Google Scholar
Bradbury, J. M. & Jordan, F. T. W. (1971). Investigation into rabbit infusion media for the growth of Mycoplasma gallisepticum antigens for inoculation into rabbits. Journal of Hygiene 69, 73.Google Scholar
Coller, D. E., Strout, R. G. & Dunlop, W. R. (1955). A survey of breeding flocks and their chicks by means of profile tests for PPLO. Proceedings of the Northeast Conference of Laboratory Workers in Pullorum Disease Control.Google Scholar
Dunlop, W. R. & Strout, R. G. (1956). State wide testing for PPLO infection of poultry. Proceedings of the U.S. Livestock Sanitary Association, p. 197.Google Scholar
Eng, J. (1969). Studies on the complement fixation test with Mycoplasma pneumoniae antigen. 3. Observations on the development of complement fixing antigen in broth culture. Acta pathologica et microbiologica scandinavica 75, 598.Google Scholar
Freundt, E. A. (1969). The Mycoplasmatales and the L-phase of bacteria, p. 294, edited by Hayflick, L., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Halen, Ph. & Schyns, P. (1969). Les antigènes mycoplasmiques aviaires, Essai de standardisation des méthodes de contrôle. Annales de Médecine Vétérinaire 5, 277.Google Scholar
Herbert, W. J. (1967). Handbook of Experimental Immunology, p. 1211, edited by Weir, D. M., Oxford.Google Scholar
Hromatka, L. & Adler, H. E. (1969). Effect of pH, physical factors, and preservatives on the sensitivity of Mycoplasma gallisepticum slide agglutination antigens. Avian Diseases 13, 452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, R. E., Jungherr, E. L., Luginbuhl, R. E. & Gianforte, E. (1953). Serological studies on air sac infection. Proceedings of the Northeast Conference of Laboratory Workers in Pullorum Disease Control.Google Scholar
Jordan, F. T. W. & Kulasegaram, P. (1968 a). Serological tests for the detection of antibodies to Mycoplasma gallisepticum in chickens and turkeys. Journal of Hygiene 66, 249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordan, F. T. W. & Kulasegaram, P. (1968 b). Non-specific antibodies in chickens inoculated intratracheally with Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Journal of Comparative Pathology 78, 407.Google Scholar
Jungherr, E. L., Luginbuhl, R. E., Tourtellotte, M. E. & Burr, M.E. (1955). Significance of serological testing for chronic respiratory disease. Proceedings of the American Veterinary Medical Association, p. 315.Google Scholar
Kulasegaram, P. (1967). Serological studies on M. gallisepticum. Ph.D. thesis, University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Leach, R. H. & Blaxland, J. D. (1966). The need for standardisation of serological techniques for the detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection in poultry. Veterinary Record 79, 308.Google Scholar
Mayeda, B. & Lewis, R. V. (1969). The effect of incubation time longer than 24 hours on Mycoplasma gallisepticum serum tube agglutination test titres. Avian Diseases 13, 783.Google Scholar
Miles, A. A. & Misra, S. S. (1938). The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. Journal of Hygiene 38, 732.Google ScholarPubMed
Pollack, J. D., Somerson, N. L. & Senterfit, L. B. (1969). Effect of pH on the immunogenicity of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Journal of Bacteriology 97, 612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, D. H., Olesiuk, O. M. & Van Roekel, H. (1967). Immunologic response of fowl to Mycoplasma gallisepticum and its relationship to latent infection. American Journal of Veterinary Research 28, 1135.Google Scholar
Roberts, D. H. (1970). Non-specific agglutination reactions with Mycoplasma gallisepticum antigens. Veterinary Record 87, 125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornton, G. A. (1969). Serum treatment and antigen dose effects on agglutination and haemagglutination inhibition by Mycoplasma gallisepticum antibodies. British Veterinary Journal 125, 195.Google Scholar
White, F. H., Wallace, G. I. & Alberts, J. O. (1954). Serological and electron microscope studies of chronic respiratory disease agent of chickens and of turkey sinusitis agent. Poultry Science 33, 500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar