1.
Fujino, T, et al.
On the bacteriological examination of Shirasu-food poisoning. Medical Journal of Osaka University
1953; 4: 299–304.
2.
National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis and Infectious Diseases Control Division, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.
Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Japan, 1996–1998. Infectious Agents Surveillance Reports
1999; 20: 159–160.
3.
National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis and Infectious Diseases Control Division, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Bacterial food poisoning in Japan, 1998–2007. Infectious Agents Surveillance Reports
2008; 29: 213–214.
4.
Bag, PK, et al.
Clonal diversity among recently emerged strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 associated with pandemic spread. Journal of Clinical Microbiology
1999; 37: 2354–2357.
5.
Chiou, CS, et al.
Vibrio parahaemolyticus serovar O3:K6 as cause of unusually high incidence of food-borne disease outbreaks in Taiwan from 1996 to 1999. Journal of Clinical Microbiology
2000; 38: 4621–4625.
6.
Vuddhakul, V, et al.
Isolation of a pandemic O3:K6 clone of a Vibrio parahaemolyticus strain from environmental and clinical sources in Thailand. Applied and Environmental Microbiology
2000; 66: 2685–2689.
7.
Wong, HC, et al.
Characterization of Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 from Asia. Applied and Environmental Microbiology
2000; 66: 3981–3986.
8.
Martinez-Urtaza, J, et al.
Pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6, Europe. Emerging Infectious Diseases
2005; 11: 1319–1320.
9.
Ottaviani, D, et al.
First clinical report of pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 infection in Italy. Journal of Clinical Microbiology
2008; 46: 2144–2145.
10.
Daniels, NA, et al.
Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections in the United States, 1973–1998. Journal of Infectious Disease
2000; 181: 1661–1666.
11.
Daniels, NA, et al.
Emergence of a new Vibrio parahaemolyticus serotype in raw oysters a prevention quandary. Journal of the American Medical Association
2000; 284:1541–1545.
12.
Gendel, SM, et al.
Automated ribotyping differentiates Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 strains associated with a Texas outbreak from other clinical strains. Journal of Food Protection
2001; 64: 1617–1620.
13.
Newton, A, et al.
Increasing rates of vibriosis in the United States, 1996–2010: review of Surveillance Data From 2 Systems. Clinical Infectious Disease. 2012; 54: S391–S395.
14.
González-Escalona, N, et al.
Vibrio parahaemolyticus diarrhea, Chile, 1998 and 2004. Emerging Infectious Diseases
2005; 11: 129–131.
15.
Nair, GB, et al.
Global dissemination of Vibrio parahaemolyticus serotype O3:K6 and its serovariants. Clinical Microbiological Review
2007; 20: 39–48.
16.
Bej, AK, et al.
Detection of total and hemolysin-producing Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shellfish using multiplex PCR amplification of tl, tdh and trh
. Journal of Microbiological Methods
1999; 36: 215–225.
17.
Nordstrom, JL, et al.
Development of a multiplex real-time PCR assay with an internal amplification control for the detection of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus bacteria in oysters. Applied and Environmental Microbiology
2007; 73: 5840–5847.
18.
Tada, J, et al.
Detection of the thermostable direct hemolysin gene (tdh) and the thermostable direct hemolysin-related hemolysin gene (trh) of Vibrio parahaemolyticus by polymerase chain reaction. Molecular and Cellular Probes
1992; 6: 477–487.
19.
Ward, LN, Bej, AK. Detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shellfish by use of multiplexed real-time PCR with TaqMan fluorescent probes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology
2006; 72: 2031–2042.
20.
Bilung, LM, et al.
Detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in cockle (Anadara granosa) by PCR. FEMS Microbiology Letters
2005; 252: 85–88.
21.
Dileep, V, et al.
Application of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus associated with tropical seafoods and coastal environment. Letters in Applied Microbiology
2003; 36: 423–427.
22.
Jones, JL, et al.
Comparison of molecular detection methods for Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus
. Food Microbiology
2012; 30: 105–111.
23.
Kirs, M, et al.
A survey of oysters (Crassostrea gigas) in New Zealand for Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus
. International Journal of Food Microbiology
2011; 147: 149–153.
24.
Terzi, G, Büyüktanir, O, Yurdusev, N. Detection of the tdh and trh genes in Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates in fish and mussels from Middle Black Sea Coast of Turkey. Letters in Applied Microbiology
2009; 49: 757–763.
25.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization. Risk assessment of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood: interpretative summary and technical report. Microbiological risk assessment series no. 16. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization, 2011.
27.
Kumagai, S. Occurrence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus foodborne infections. Report on prevention of Vibrio parahaemolyticus foodborne infections [in Japanese]. Tokyo: Committee of Milk, Meat and Seafood in Food Sanitation Investigation Council, pp. 4–6, 2000.
28.
Akahane, S, et al.
Occurrence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus food poisoning outbreaks and serotyping of isolates from food poisoning cases in Shizuoka prefecture (1993–1984). Bulletin of Shizuoka Prefectural Institute of Public Health and Environmental Science
1984; 27: 89–95.
29.
Hara-Kudo, , et al.
Characteristics of a sharp decrease in Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections and seafood contamination in Japan. International Journal of Food Microbiology
2012; 157: 95–101.
30.
Kumagai, S. Researches on use of hygienic seawater in seafood market. Report on prevention of Vibrio parahaemolyticus foodborne infections [in Japanese]. Tokyo: Committee of Milk, Meat and Seafood in Food Sanitation Investigation Council, p. 14, 2000.
31.
Hara-Kudo, Y, Kumagai, S. Investigation on seafood and measures against Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Japan [in Japanese]. Japanese Journal of Food Microbiology
2003; 24: 165–169.
32.
Committee of Milk, Meat and Seafood in Food Sanitation Investigation Council. Researches on Vibrio parahaemolyticus contamination of seawater in seafood markets [in Japanese]. Conference material no. 3-3, 31 October 2000. Tokyo: Committee of Milk, Meat and Seafood in Food Sanitation Investigation Council, 2000.
33.
Shimada, T, et al. Research on Vibrio parahaemolyticus contamination: advanced hygienic control on animal foodstuff [in Japanese]. Report of a Health Sciences Research Grant from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, 2000, pp. 233–258.
34.
International Commission on Microbiological Specification for Foods.
Vibrio parahaemolytocus
. In: Microoganisms in Foods 5. Characteristics of Microbial Pathogens, 1996, pp. 426–435. London, UK: Blackie Academic & Professional.
35.
Committee of Milk, Meat and Seafood in Food Sanitation Investigation Council. Researches on Vibrio parahaemolyticus contamination level in seafood [n Japanese]. Conference material no. 3-2, 31 October 2000. Tokyo: Committee of Milk, Meat and Seafood in Food Sanitation Investigation Council, 2000.
36.
Sugiyama, K, et al. Detection of TDH-producing Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seawater and sea mud. Research on Vibrio parahaemolyticus contamination: Advanced hygienic control on animal foodstuff [in Japanese]. Report of a Health Sciences Research Grant from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, 2000, pp. 202–210.
37.
Committee of Milk, Meat and Seafood in Food Sanitation Investigation Council. Researches on Vibrio parahaemolyticus contamination level in food associated with infections in 1999 [in Japanese]. Conference material no. 3, 21 January 2000. Tokyo: Committee of Milk, Meat and Seafood in Food Sanitation Investigation Council, 2000.
38.
Kumagai, S. Studies on prevention measure for bacterial foodborne infections. Report of a Health Sciences Research Grant from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare [in Japanese], pp. 87–139, 2010.
39.
Hara-Kudo, Y, et al.
Prevalence of pandemic TDH-producing Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 in seafood and the coastal environment in Japan. Applied and Environmental Microbiology
2003; 69: 3883–3891.
40.
Fukushima, H. Distribution of thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH)- and TDH-related hemolysin (TRH)-producing Vibrio parahaemolyticus in coastal Shimane Prefecture and TDH and TRH V. parahaemolyticus contamination of retail shellfish [in Japanese]. Kansenshogaku Zasshi
2007; 81: 138–148.
41.
Miwa, N, et al.
Levels of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and thermostable direct hemolysin gene-positive organisms in retail seafood determined by the most probable number-polymerase chain reaction (MPN-PCR) method. Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan
2006; 47: 41–45.