Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684bc48f8b-mkrr2 Total loading time: 0.399 Render date: 2021-04-10T20:18:08.094Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

The impact of household transmission on duration of outpatient colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2010

E. LAUTENBACH
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
P. TOLOMEO
Affiliation:
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
I. NACHAMKIN
Affiliation:
Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
B. HU
Affiliation:
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
T. E. ZAOUTIS
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA, USA
Corresponding
E-mail address:
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Summary

We identified eight consecutive patients who presented with a skin or soft tissue infection due to MRSA. Of seven household members of these cases, three were colonized with MRSA. The mean duration of MRSA colonization in index cases was 33 days (range 14–104), while mean duration of colonization in household cases was 54 days (range 12–95). There was a borderline significant association between having a concurrent colonized household member and a longer duration of colonization (mean 44 days vs. 26 days, P=0·08).

Type
Short Report
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have risen markedly over the past 20 years [1]. Although historically limited to healthcare settings, MRSA infections in the community [i.e. community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA)] have increased rapidly [Reference Herold2]. Efforts to control CA-MRSA have been challenging due to an incomplete understanding of the epidemiology of colonization with this organism. Focusing on CA-MRSA colonization is critical because the longer a patient remains colonized, the greater the likelihood of both developing a new CA-MRSA infection as well as transmitting the organism to others. Reports have described spread of MRSA in households [Reference Wagenvoort3, Reference Huang4]. However, no longitudinal studies of CA-MRSA colonization and transmission in the household setting have been performed. The goals of this study were to determine the duration of CA-MRSA colonization and explore the impact of household MRSA transmission on duration of colonization.

During a 2-week period in June 2008, we identified all consecutive adult patients who presented to a University of Pennsylvania Health System outpatient setting with a skin or soft tissue infection (SSTI) confirmed by culture to be due to MRSA. Eligible subjects were contacted via phone and asked whether they and all household members were willing to participate in the study. For those households in which all members agreed to participate, research staff visited the household within 1 week of the initial presentation of the SSTI in the household index case. Following enrolment, each subject in the household (i.e. the index case and all household members) underwent self-sampling for MRSA colonization. It should be noted that self-sampling for MRSA is highly sensitive compared to sampling by a healthcare professional [Reference Lautenbach5]. Every subject provided self-collected swabs from the following anatomic sites: nares, axillae, throat, groin, and perineum. These swabs were obtained every 2 weeks and sent to the study laboratory via express mail. Subjects were requested to submit swabs for a total of 3 months after the first swab was obtained (i.e. about 14 weeks total).

ChromAgar MRSA medium (BBL™ CHROMagar™ MRSA, BD Diagnostic Systems, USA) was used to plate swab samples [Reference Han6]. The genetic relatedness of MRSA isolates was determined by molecular typing using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Chromosomal DNA was digested with SmaI restriction profiles [Reference Peacock7] with the results analysed using the Fingerprinting II Informatix Software version 3.0 (Bio-Rad, USA) and interpreted using established criteria [Reference Tenover8]. SCCmec typing was performed using a PCR protocol previously described [Reference Zhang9]. Presence of Panton–Valentine leukocidin (PVL) was not assessed.

The actual end date of colonization was considered as the midpoint between the date of the last positive culture and the date of the first negative culture. If the last culture during the follow-up period was positive, this was considered the date of last positive culture. The unadjusted association between specific variables and duration of colonization was assessed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. A two-tailed P value of <0·05 was considered significant. All statistical calculations were performed using Stata version 10 (StataCorp, USA).

This study was reviewed and approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board.

Eight households comprising 15 subjects were enrolled in the study. Of the 15 subjects, 10 (67%) were female, eight were white, three were African American, and four were of unknown race. The median age of subjects was 46 years (range 21–76). There was one four-person household, four two-person households, and three one-person households. By definition, there were eight index cases (i.e. subjects who initially presented with a SSTI due to MRSA) who were all colonized with MRSA upon enrolment. In addition, of seven household members, three (43%) were found to be colonized with MRSA. Of the latter, one was positive at baseline (upon initial sampling) while another two became newly colonized after enrolment. No clinical MRSA infections were identified during the study nor were any decolonization protocols offered to subjects.

The mean duration of follow-up in all subjects was 56 days (range 14–104). The mean duration of colonization in index cases was 33 days (range 14–104), while mean duration of colonization in household cases was 54 days (range 12–95). Of all 11 subjects who were colonized (eight index cases and three household members), three remained colonized at the end of follow-up. For index cases, there were no significant associations between baseline demographics and duration of MRSA colonization. However, there was a borderline significant association between having a concurrent colonized household member and a longer duration of colonization (mean 44 days vs. 26 days, P=0·08). Several PFGE types were detected, with the same type detected within a family. One of the types was identical to USA300 [Reference McDougal10]. Both SCCmecII and SCCmecIVa MRSA isolates were identified although the SCCmec type was not associated with duration of colonization.

We found that MRSA colonization in the outpatient setting is often prolonged. Furthermore, nearly 50% of household members were also found to be colonized. This raises issues both for the impact of colonization of the index case on potential spread to household members, as well as the potential for spread from household members to the index case. Indeed, the borderline association between presence of an MRSA-colonized household member and prolonged MRSA colonization in the index case supports this concept. We also demonstrated the feasibility of longitudinal self-collection of swab samples for MRSA by study subjects. Overall, our results demonstrate the important role of household transmission in the epidemiology and propagation of CA-MRSA. Future efforts to curb the spread and impact of CA-MRSA must be based on a thorough understanding of the longitudinal dynamics of MRSA colonization within households.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by a Commonwealth Universal Research Enhancement (CURE) grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Health (E.L.), a National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant K24AI080942 (E.L.) and by grant no. U18HS016946 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

Dr Lautenbach has received research support from Merck, Ortho-McNeil, Cubist and AstraZeneca.

References

1.National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report. Data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. American Journal of Infection Control 2004; 32: 470485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Herold, BC, et al. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children with no identified predisposing risk. Journal of the American Medical Asssociation 1998; 279: 593598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Wagenvoort, JH, et al. Risk of re-introduction of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus into the hospital by intrafamilial spread from and to healthcare workers. Journal of Hospital Infection 2005; 59: 6768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Huang, YC, et al. Nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in household contacts of children with community-acquired diseases in Taiwan. Pediatric Infectious DiseasesJournal 2007; 26: 10661068.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Lautenbach, E, et al. Surveillance cultures for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Diagnostic yield of anatomic sites and comparison of provider- and patient-collected samples. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2009; 30: 380382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Han, Z, et al. Evaluation of mannitol salt agar, CHROMagar™ Staph aureus and CHROMagar™ MRSA for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from nasal swab specimens. Journal of Medical Microbiology 2007; 56: 4346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Peacock, SJ, et al. Comparison of multilocus sequence typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as tools for typing Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a microepidemiological setting. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2002; 40: 37643770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Tenover, FC, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995; 33: 22332239.Google Scholar
9.Zhang, K, et al. Novel multiplex PCR assay for characterization and concomitant subtyping of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec types I to V in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2005; 43: 50265033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.McDougal, LK, et al. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: establishing a national database. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003; 41: 51135120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 69
Total number of PDF views: 55 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 10th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Access Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The impact of household transmission on duration of outpatient colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The impact of household transmission on duration of outpatient colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The impact of household transmission on duration of outpatient colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *