Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Household structure and infectious disease transmission

  • T. HOUSE (a1) and M. J. KEELING (a1)

Summary

One of the central tenets of modern infectious disease epidemiology is that an understanding of heterogeneities, both in host demography and transmission, allows control to be efficiently optimized. Due to the strong interactions present, households are one of the most important heterogeneities to consider, both in terms of predicting epidemic severity and as a target for intervention. We consider these effects in the context of pandemic influenza in Great Britain, and find that there is significant local (ward-level) variation in the basic reproductive ratio, with some regions predicted to suffer 50% faster growth rate of infection than the mean. Childhood vaccination was shown to be highly effective at controlling an epidemic, generally outperforming random vaccination and substantially reducing the variation between regions; only nine out of over 10 000 wards did not obey this rule and these can be identified as demographically atypical regions. Since these benefits of childhood vaccination are a product of correlations between household size and number of dependent children in the household, our results are qualitatively robust for a variety of disease scenarios.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Household structure and infectious disease transmission
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Household structure and infectious disease transmission
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Household structure and infectious disease transmission
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Author for correspondence: Dr T. House, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. (Email: T.A.House@warwick.ac.uk)

References

Hide All
1. Cauchemez, S, et al. A Bayesian MCMC approach to study transmission of influenza: application to household longitudinal data. Statistics in Medicine 2004; 23: 34693487.
2. Longini, IM, et al. Estimating household and community transmission parameters for influenza. American Journal of Epidemiology 1982; 115: 736751.
3. Hope-Simpson, RE. Infectiousness of communicable diseases in the household. Lancet 1952; 2: 549554.
4. Wu, JT, et al. Reducing the impact of the next influenza pandemic using household-based public health interventions. PLoS Medicine 2006; 3: 15321540.
5. Dodd, PJ, Ferguson, NM. Approximate disease dynamics in household-structured populations. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2007; 4: 11031106.
6. Fraser, C. Estimating individual and household reproduction numbers in an emerging epidemic. PLoS ONE 2007; 2: 112.
7. Ball, F, O'Neill, P. Stochastic epidemic models in structured populations featuring dynamic vaccination and isolation. Journal of Applied Probability 2007; 44: 571585.
8. Ball, F, Lyne, O. Optimal vaccination schemes for epidemics among a population of households, with application to variola minor in Brazil. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2006; 15: 481497.
9. Ball, F, Lyne, O. Optimal vaccination policies for stochastic epidemics among a population of households. Mathematical Biosciences 2002; 177–178: 333354.
10. Ferguson, NM, et al. Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic. Nature 2006; 442: 448452.
11. Viboud, C, et al. Synchrony, waves, and spatial hierarchies in the spread of influenza. Science 2006; 312: 447451.
12. Germann, T, et al. Mitigation strategies for pandemic influenza in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2006; 103: 59355940.
13. Chowell, G, Nishiura, H, Bettencourt, LMA. Comparative estimation of the reproduction number for pandemic influenza from daily case notification data. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2006; 4: 155166.
14. Roberts, MG, et al. A model for the spread and control of pandemic influenza in an isolated geographical region. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2006; 4: 325330.
15. Ferguson, N, et al. Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in southeast asia. Nature (London) 2005; 437: 209214.
16. Gani, R, et al. Potential impact of antiviral drug use during influenza pandemic. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2005; 11: 13551362.
17. Duerr, H, et al. The impact of contact structure on infectious disease control: influenza and antiviral agents. Epidemiology and Infection 2007; 135: 11241132.
18. House, T, Keeling, MJ. Deterministic epidemic models with explicit household structure. Mathematical Biosciences 2008; 213: 2939.
19. Anderson, RM, May, RM. Infectious Diseases of Humans. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
20. Keeling, MJ, Rohani, P. Modelling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.
21. Melegaro, A, Gay, N, Medley, G. Estimating the transmission parameters of pneumococcal carriage in households. Epidemiology and Infection 2004; 132: 433441.
22. Diekmann, O, Heesterbeek, J, Metz, J. On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R 0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Mathematical Biology 1990; 28: 365382.
23. Dieckmann, O, Heesterbeek, JAP. Mathematical Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases: Model Building, Analysis and Interpretation. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 2000.
24. Department of Health. Pandemic flu: a national framework for responding to an influenza pandemic. Department of Health, London, 2007.
25. Ball, F, Mollison, D, Scalia-Tomba, G. Epidemics with two levels of mixing. Annals of Applied Probability 1997; 7: 4689.
26. Kermack, WO, McKendrick, AG. Contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 1927; 115: 700721.
27. Office for National Statistics. 2001 census: Commissioned table C0844. ESRC/JISC Census Programme.
28. Office for National Statistics. 2001 census: Digitised boundary data (England and Wales) [computer file].
29. General Register Office for Scotland. 2001 census: Digitised boundary data (Scotland) [computer file].

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

House supplementary pdf
House supplementary pdf

 PDF (99 KB)
99 KB

Household structure and infectious disease transmission

  • T. HOUSE (a1) and M. J. KEELING (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed