Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Haemophilus ducreyi infections – time for reappraisal

  • M. G. McEntegart (a1), S. Hafiz (a1) and G. R. Kinghorn (a2)

Summary

As the literature on Haemophilus ducreyi and clinical chancroid is reviewed, it becomes obvious that many significant findings have been forgotten over the years. As a result, from the time of Ducrey's original description of the organism in 1890 until about 1977, both clinical and laboratory experts in the United Kingdom believed that H. ducreyi infections were rare, generally acquired abroad, and almost impossible to confirm in the routine laboratory! In consequence it was a common view that it was not worth looking for H. ducreyi until all other possible causes of genital ulceration had been excluded. Moreover, the search for such an infection stopped as soon as any other cause for the patient's lesions had been found.

A decision to ignore this ‘rule’ in Sheffield led to our looking for H. ducreyi in specimens from an unselected series of patients with genital ulceration including a number with herpes genitalis infections. The surprise finding of H. ducreyi in circumstances suggesting that it was a secondary invader made us re-examine the whole question of H. ducreyi infections and chancroid and wonder if the same organism can act as a primary pathogen and as a secondary invader. An account of the media and methods we used and of the characteristics of the organism is presented. In an attempt to find out more about the characteristic coherent colonies of H. ducreyi we studied them with the scanning electron microscope. It is clear that the whole subject of H. ducreyi infections has been neglected in the United Kingdom, but we believe that interest has now been aroused and progress will surely follow. Some areas for further investigation are suggested.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Haemophilus ducreyi infections – time for reappraisal
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Haemophilus ducreyi infections – time for reappraisal
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Haemophilus ducreyi infections – time for reappraisal
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Ajello, G. W., Deacon, W. E., Paul, L. & Walls, K. W. (1966). Nutritional studies of a virulent strain of Haemophilus ducreyi. Journal of Bacteriology 72, 802808.
Barile, M. F., Blumberg, J. M., Kraul, C. W. & Yaguchi, R. (1962). Penile lesions among US Armed Forces personnel in Japan. Archives of Dermatology 86, 273281.
Bezançon, F., Griffon, V. & Le Sourd, L. (1900). Recherche sur la culture du bacille de Ducrey. Presse Médicale 2, 385390.
Beeson, P. B. (1946). Studies on chancroid. IV. The Ducrey bacillus growth requirements and inhibition by antibiotic agents. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 61, 8185.
Borchardt, K. A. & Hoke, A. W. (1970). Simplified laboratory technique for diagnosis of chancroid. Archives of Dermatology 102, 188192.
Brams, J. (1924). Isolation of Ducrey bacillus from smegma of thirty men. Journal of the American Medical Association 82, 11661167.
Bruck, C. (1915). Concerning the control of venereal diseases in the field and also a contribution to the pathogenesis of soft sore. Münchener Medizinische Wochenschrift B1z 4, quoted by Sturm, A W. (1981) in a thesis entitled ‘Clinical and Bacteriological Aspects of Soft Sore – Rodopi’, Amsterdam 1981. p. 60.
Brunton, J. L., Maclean, A. R. & Albritton, W. L. (1979). Plasmid-mediated ampicillin resistance in Haemophilus ducreyi. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 15, 294299.
Chapel, T., Brown, W. J., Jeffries, C. & Stewart, J. A. (1978). The microbiological flora of penile ulcerations. Journal of Infectious Diseases 137, 5056.
Deacon, W. E., Albritton, D. C., Olansky, S. & Kaplan, W. (1956). V.D.R.L. Chancroid Studies. I. A simple procedure for the isolation and identification of Haemophilus ducreyi. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 26, 399406.
Deneer, H. G., Slaney, L., Maclean, I. W. & Albritton, W. L. (1982). Mobilization of non-conjugative antibiotic resistance plasmids in Haemophilus ducreyi. Journal of Bacteriology 149, 726732.
Ducrey, A. (1890). Recherches expérimentales sur la nature intime du principle contagieux du chancre mou. Annales de Dermatologie et de Syphiligraphie 1, 5657.
Greenwald, E. (1943). Chancroidal infection; treatment and diagnosis. Journal of the American Medical Association 121, 911.
Hafiz, S., Kinghorn, G. R. & McEntegart, M. G. (1981). Chancroid in Sheffield. British Journal of Venereal Diseases 57, 382386.
Hammond, G. W., Lian, C. J., Wilt, J. C. & Ronald, A. R. (1978 a). Comparison of specimen collection and laboratory techniques for isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 7, 3943.
Hammond, G. W., Lian, C. H., Wilt, J. C. & Ronald, A. R. (1978 b). Antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus ducreyi. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 13, 608612.
Handsfield, H. H., Totten, P. A., Fennel, C. L., Falkow, S. & Holmes, K. K. (1981). Molecular epidemiology of Haemophilus ducreyi infections. Annals of Internal Medicine 95, 315318.
Hewlett, R. T. (1929). Chancroid and Bacillus ducreyi. In Mrc System of Bacteriology, vol. 2, pp. 411419. London: HMSO
Heyman, A., Beeson, P. B. & Sheldon, W. H. (1945). Diagnosis of chancroid. Journal of the American Medical Association 129, 935938.
Himmel, J. (1901). Des animaux vis-a-vis du bacille du chancre mou. Annales de l'Institut Pasteur 15, 928940.
Kaplan, W., Deacon, W. E., Olansky, S. & Albritton, D. C. (1956). VDRL chancroid studies. II. Experimental chancroid in the rabbit. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 26, 407414.
Kellog, D. S.Peacock, W. L., Deacon, W., Brown, L. & Pirkle, C. I. (1963). N. gonorrhoeae. I. Virulence genetically linked to clonal variation. Journal of Bacteriology 85, 12731279.
Kerber, R. E., Rowe, C. E. & Gilbert, K. R. (1969). Treatment of chancroid. Archives of Dermatology 100, 604607.
Kilian, M. (1976). A taxonomic study of the genus Haemophilus with the proposal of a new species Journal of General Microbiology 93, 962.
Khoo, R., Sng, E. H. & Goh, A. J. (1977). A study of sexually transmitted disease in 200 prostitutes in Singapore. Asian Journal of Infectious Diseases 1, 7779.
Kinghorn, G. R., Hafiz, S. & McEntegart, M. G. (1982 a). Modified Haemin-containing medium for isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi. Lancet i, 393394.
Kinghorn, G. R., Hafiz, S. & McEntegart, M. G. (1982 b). The pathogenic microbial flora of genital ulcers in Sheffield. British Journal of Venereal Diseases. (In the Press.)
Kornblith, B. A., Jacoby, A. & Chargin, L. (1941). Chancroid, treatment with Sulfathiazole and Sulfanilamide. Journal of the American Medical Association 117, 21502153.
Lykke-Olesen, L., Larsen, L., Pedersen, T. G. & Gaarslev, K. (1979). Epidemic of chancroid in Greenland 1977–78. Lancet i, 654–5.
Maclean, I. W., Bowden, G. H. W. & Albritton, W. L. (1980). Tem type beta-lactamase production in Haemophilus ducreyi. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 17, 897900.
Nayyar, K. C., Stolz, E. & Michel, M. F. (1979). Rising incidence of chancroid in Rotterdam: epidemiological. clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects. British Journal of Venereal Diseases 55, 439441.
Saelhof, C. (1924). Observations on chancroidal infections. Journal of Infectious Diseases 35, 591602.
Satulsky, E. M. (1945). Management of chancroid in a tropical theatre. Journal of the American Medical Association 127, 259262.
Sottnek, F. O., Biddle, J. W., Kraus, S. J., Weaver, R. K. & Stewart, J. A. (1980). Isolation and identification of Haemophilus ducreyi in a clinical study. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 12, 170174.
Stein, R. (1908). Die Plattencultur der streptobacillen des ulcus molle. Zeniralblatt für Bacteriologie (Originale B) 46, 664670.
Strakosch, E. A., Kendell, H. W., Craig, R. M. & Scheimelein, G. X. (1945). Clinical and laboratory investigation of 370 cases of chancroid. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 6, 95107.
Tan, T., Rajan, V. S.Koe, S. L., Tan, N. J., Tan, B. H. & Goh, A. J. (1977). Chancroid: A study of 500 cases. Asian Journal of Infectious Diseases 1, 2728.
Teague, O. & Deibert, O. (1920). The value of cultural method in the diagnosis of chancroid. Journal of Urology 4, 543550.

Haemophilus ducreyi infections – time for reappraisal

  • M. G. McEntegart (a1), S. Hafiz (a1) and G. R. Kinghorn (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed