Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T11:53:39.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors affecting lecithinase activity and production in Clostridium welchii*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

M. Nakamura
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59801
Judith A. Schulze
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59801
W. R. Cross
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59801
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A variety of factors that affect lecithinase activity and lecithinase production by Cl. welchii were studied. The lecithinase activity was time and temperature dependent. The optimum temperature varied from 30° to 46° C. according to the strain of Cl. welchii employed. Maximum lecithinase activity was produced after 12–60 hr. There was considerable strain variation. This could easily account for the differences in the published data.

Commercial purified lecithinase was more readily destroyed by heat than the lecithinase produced by Cl. welchii in culture media. The enzyme inactivation pattern at 60° C. was similar to that at 90° C. This is not in agreement with the reports of others who found that less enzyme was inactivated at the higher temperatures.

Acid pH values completely inactivated the enzyme. However, alkaline pH values did not significantly destroy the enzyme. The lecithovitellin reaction was completely inhibited at pH values of 1–5. The optimum pH for the reaction was around pH 7–8.

The production of lecithinase was dependent upon the pH of the culture medium. One strain produced measurable lecithinase at pH values of 5·5–8·5, whereas another strain produced lecithinase only at pH values 6–5–7–5.

Lecithin stimulated the production of lecithinase in a chemically defined medium.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

References

Adams, M. H. & Hendee, E. D. (1945). Methods for the production of the alpha and theta toxins of Clostridium welchii. J. Immun. 51, 249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adams, M. H., Hendee, E. D. & Pappenheimer, A. M. (1947). Factors involved in production of Clostridium welchii alpha toxin. J. exp. Med. 85, 701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, M. J., Logan, M. A. & Tytell, A. A. (1948). The growth requirements of Clostridium perfringens (welchii) BP 6K. J. biol. Chem. 174, 1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collee, J. G., Knowlden, J. A. & Hobbs, B. C. (1961). Studies on the growth, sporulation and carriage of Clostridium welchii with special reference to food poisoning strains. J. appl. Bact. 24, 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dack, G. M. (1947). Problems and errors in assigning causes of bacterial food poisoning. Am. J. publ. Hlth 37, 360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dische, F. E. & Elek, S. D. (1957). Experimental food-poisoning by Clostridium welchii. Lancet ii, 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, E. F. & Van Heyningen, W. E. (1942). The effect of the pH and the presence of glucose during growth on the production of α and toxins and hyaluronidase by Clostridium welchii. Biochem. J. 36, 624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J., Turner, G. C. & Dmochowski, L. (1954). The inhibition of the alpha and theta toxins of Clostridium welchii by lecithin. J. Path. Bact. 67, 605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobbs, B. C., Smith, M. E., Oakley, C. L., Warrack, G. H. & Cruickshank, J. C. (1953). Clostridium welchii food poisoning. J. Hyg., Camb. 51, 75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kushner, D. J. (1957). An evaluation of the egg-yolk reaction as a test for lecithinase activity. J. Bact. 73, 297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macfarlane, M. G. & Knight, B. C. J. G (1941). The biochemistry of bacterial toxins. I. The lecithinase activity of Cl. welchii toxins. Biochem. J. 35, 884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsumoto, M. (1961). Studies on phospholipids. II. Phospholipase activity of Clostridium perfringens toxin. J. Biochem. 49, 23.Google Scholar
Miles, E. M. & Miles, A. A. (1950). The relation of toxicity and enzyme activity in the lecithinases of Clostridium bifermentans and Clostridium welchii. J. gen. Microbiol. 4, 22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakamura, M., Cook, J. A. & Cross, W. R. (1968). Lecithinase production by Clostridium perfringens in chemically defined media. Appl. Microbiol. 16, 1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, M. & Cross, W. R. (1968). The lecithinase (α toxin) activity of strains of Clostridium perfringens. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 127, 719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nygren, N. (1962). Phospholipase C-producing bacteria and food poisoning. An experimental study on Clostridium perfringens and Bacillus cereus. Acta path. microbiol. scand., suppl. no. 160.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. E. (1957). Toxin production by Clostridium perfringens. I. Synthesis of α- and θ-hemolysins, lecithinase and proteinase in a synthetic medium. J. Bact. 74, 439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, L. Des. & Gardner, M. V. (1949). The anomalous heat inactivation of Clostridium perfringens lecithinase. Archs Biochem. 25, 54.Google Scholar
van Heyningen, W. E. (1941). The biochemistry of the gas gangrene toxins. I. Estimation of the α toxin of Cl. welchii, type A. Biochem. J., 35, 1246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, K. F. & Strong, D. H. (1967). Some properties of heat-resistant and heat-sensitive strains of Clostridium perfringens. I. Heat resistance and toxigenicity. J. Bact. 93, 21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed