Oelemann, MC, et al.
Assessment of an optimized mycobacterial interspersed repetitive- unit-variable-number tandem-repeat typing system combined with spoligotyping for population-based molecular epidemiology studies of tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology
2007; 45: 691–697.
Grant, J, et al.
Tuberculosis genotyping – United States, 2004–2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
2012; 61: 723–725.
Barnes, PF, Cave, MD. Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis. New England Journal of Medicine
2003; 349: 1149–1156.
Dahle, UR, et al.
Tuberculosis in contacts need not indicate disease transmission. Thorax
2005; 60: 136–137.
van Soolingen, D, et al.
Occurrence and stability of insertion sequences in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains: evaluation of an insertion sequence-dependent DNA polymorphism as a tool in the epidemiology of tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology
1991; 29: 2578–2586.
Jonsson, J, et al.
Comparison between RFLP and MIRU-VNTR genotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated in Stockholm 2009 to 2011. PLoS ONE
2014; 9: e95159.
Niemann, S, et al.
Stability of IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in actual chains of transmission. Journal of Clinical Microbiology
2000; 38: 2563–2567.
Benjamin, WH Jr., et al.
Identification of a contaminating Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain with a transposition of an IS6110 insertion element resulting in an altered spoligotype. Journal of Clinical Microbiology
2001; 39: 1092–1096.
Allix-Beguec, C, et al.
Proposal of a consensus set of hypervariable mycobacterial interspersed repetitive-unit-variable-number tandem-repeat loci for subtyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing isolates. Journal of Clinical Microbiology
2014; 52: 164–72.
Cave, MD, et al.
Epidemiologic import of tuberculosis cases whose isolates have similar but not identical IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns. Journal of Clinical Microbiology
2005; 43: 1228–1233.
de Boer, AS, et al.
Analysis of rate of change of IS6110 RFLP patterns of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on serial patient isolates. Journal of Infectious Diseases
1999; 180: 1238–44.
de Boer, AS, van Soolingen, D, Borgdorff, MW. Genetic mutations occur gradually in in vivo populations of Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology
2001; 39: 3814.
de Boer, AS, et al.
Genetic heterogeneity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates reflected in IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns as low-intensity bands. Journal of Clinical Microbiology
2000; 38: 4478–4784.
Warren, RM, et al.
Calculation of the stability of the IS6110 banding pattern in patients with persistent Mycobacterium tuberculosis disease. Journal of Clinical Microbiology
2002; 40: 1705–1708.
Tanaka, MM, Francis, AR. Methods of quantifying and visualising outbreaks of tuberculosis using genotypic information. Infection, Genetics and Evolution
2005; 5: 35–43.
Behr, MA, et al.
Predictive value of contact investigation for identifying recent transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
1998; 158: 465–469.
Warren, RM, et al.
Evolution of the IS6110-based restriction fragment length polymorphism pattern during the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology
2002; 40: 1277–1282.
Benedetti, A, et al.
How close is close enough? Exploring matching criteria in the estimation of recent transmission of tuberculosis. American Journal of Epidemiology
2010; 172: 318–326.
van der Spuy, GD, et al.
Use of genetic distance as a measure of ongoing transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology
2003; 41: 5640–5644.
Lindquist, S, et al.
Prioritizing tuberculosis clusters by genotype for public health action, Washington, USA. Emerging Infectious Diseases
2013; 19: 493–496.
McNabb, SJ, et al.
Added epidemiologic value to tuberculosis prevention and control of the investigation of clustered genotypes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. American Journal of Epidemiology
2004; 160: 589–597.
Case, C, et al.
Examining DNA fingerprinting as an epidemiology tool in the tuberculosis program in the Northwest Territories, Canada. International Journal of Circumpolar Health
2013; 72: 20067.
Anger, HA, et al.
Active case finding and prevention of tuberculosis among a cohort of contacts exposed to infectious tuberculosis cases in New York City. Clinical Infectious Diseases
2012; 54: 1287–1295.
Clark, CM, et al.
Universal genotyping in tuberculosis control program, New York City, 2001–2003. Emerging Infectious Diseases
2006; 12: 719–724.
New York City Public Health Code. 2000. Article 13, Section 13·05.
Groenen, PM, et al.
Nature of DNA polymorphism in the direct repeat cluster of Mycobacterium tuberculosis; application for strain differentiation by a novel typing method. Molecular Microbiology
1993; 10: 1057–1065.
Kamerbeek, J, et al.
Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. Journal of Clinical Microbiology
1997; 35: 907–914.
Kremer, K, et al.
Comparison of methods based on different molecular epidemiological markers for typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains: inter-laboratory study of discriminatory power and reproducibility. Journal of Clinical Microbiology
1999; 37: 2607–2618.
van Embden, JD, et al.
Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology. Journal of Clinical Microbiology
1993; 31: 406–409.
Thierry, D, et al.
IS6110, an IS-like element of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Nucleic Acids Research
1990; 18: 188.
Braden, CR, Crawford, JT, Schable, BA. Quality assessment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotyping in a large laboratory network. Emerging Infectious Diseases
2002; 8: 1210–1215.
Warren, RM, et al.
Patients with active tuberculosis often have different strains in the same sputum specimen. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
2004; 169: 610–614.