Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Evaluation of procedures for hygienic hand-disinfection: controlled parallel experiments on the Vienna test model

  • M. L. Rotter (a1), W. Koller (a1), G. Wewalka (a1), H. P. Werner (a2), G. A. J. Ayliffe (a3) and J. R. Babb (a3)...

Summary

Controlled parallel experiments were performed on the Vienna test model for the evaluation of procedures for hygienic hand-disinfection in three laboratories (Vienna, Mainz, Birmingham). The degerming activity of four procedures, each taking 1 min, was assessed repeatedly and compared with that of a standard disinfection procedure (ST) using isopropanol 60 % (v/v). The mean log reductions (mean log RF) for each procedure were as follows: n−propanol 50% (v/v) 4·85 and 5·14 in Vienna (V) and Mainz (M) respectively, ethanol 70 % (v/v) + chlorhexidinegluconate 0·5% (w/v), 4·01 (V), 3·76 (M) and 4·00 in Birmingham (B). Washing procedures were less effective, mean log RF 's of 3·19 (V), 3·49 (M) and 3·04 (B) were obtained with povidone-iodine soap, and 2·91 (V), 3·37 (M) and 3·27 (B) with a liquid phenolic soap. Analysis of variance on the data from Vienna and Mainz revealed significant differences of means not only between procedures (‘preparations’) but also on repeat testing. To compensate for the influence of variables such as test subjects, laboratory and day, the Vienna test model provides a method of standardization by testing a ST in parallel with the test procedure (P).

Standardization of the results was obtained by pair-wise substraction, log . Analysis of variance on the resulting values demonstrated that comparability of the results between laboratories and on repeat testing was achieved. The relative variation of the measurements within the laboratories ranged from 0·9 to 4·2%. As assessed by power-analysis, a disinfection procedure will be detected as significantly (P= 0·1) inferior to the standard processes in 95 of 100 experiments if it produces a mean log RF that is at least 0·55–0·65 log units smaller than that of the standard.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Evaluation of procedures for hygienic hand-disinfection: controlled parallel experiments on the Vienna test model
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Evaluation of procedures for hygienic hand-disinfection: controlled parallel experiments on the Vienna test model
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Evaluation of procedures for hygienic hand-disinfection: controlled parallel experiments on the Vienna test model
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Ayliffe, G. A. J. & Babb, J. R. (1979) Hygienic hand disinfection: selection of test organisms. Hospital-Hygiene, Sanderheft, 09 pp. 3738.
Ayliffe, G. A. J., Babb, J. R. & Quoraishi, A. H. (1978). A test for ‘hygienic’ hand disinfection. Journal of Clinical Pathology 31, 923928.
Cohen, J. (1977). In Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences, revised edition. Academic Press.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hygiene und Mikrobioloqie (1981). Richtlinien für die Prüfung und Bewertung chemischer Desinfektionsverfahre – erster Teilabschnitt. Zentralbatt für Bakteriologie und Hygiene (I. Abteilung Orginale, Reihe B) 172, 528556.
Kundi, M., Roller, W., Mittermayer, H. & Rotter, M. (1975). Zur erstellung von Anforderungen an Verfahren zur Hygienischen Händedesinfektion. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie und Hygiene I. Abteilung Originale, Reihe B) 161, 165177.
Österreichische Gesellschaft Für Hygiene, Mikrobiologie und Präventivmedizin (1981). Richtlinie vom 4 November 1980 für die Bewertung der Desinfektionswirkung von Verfahren für die Hygienische Händedesinfektion. Österreichische Krankenhauszeitung 22, 2331; Hygiene±Medizin 6, 4–9.
Rotter, M., Roller, W. & Kundi, M. (1977). Eignung dreier Alkohole für eine Standard-Desinfektionsmethode in der Wertbestimmung von Verfahren für die Hygienische Händedesinfektion. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie und Hygiene (I. Abteilung Originate, Reihe B) 164, 428438.
Rotter, M., Mittermayer, H. & Kundi, M. (1974). Untersuchungen zum Modell derkünstlich kontaminierten Hand – Vorschlag für eine Prüfmethode. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie und Hygiene (I. Abteilung Originale, Reihe B) 159, 560581.
Siegel, S. (1956). The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks tests. In Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences, pp. 7583. New York, Toronto, London: McGraw-Hill.

Evaluation of procedures for hygienic hand-disinfection: controlled parallel experiments on the Vienna test model

  • M. L. Rotter (a1), W. Koller (a1), G. Wewalka (a1), H. P. Werner (a2), G. A. J. Ayliffe (a3) and J. R. Babb (a3)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed