Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Information:

  • Access
  • Cited by 5
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Zhang, Xu-Sheng 2016. Epidemic cycling in a multi-strain SIRS epidemic network model. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, Vol. 13, Issue. 1,

    Peng, Y. Yu, B. Kong, D. G. Zhao, Y. Y. Wang, P. Pang, B. B. and Gong, J. 2018. Reinfection hazard of hand-foot-mouth disease in Wuhan, China, using Cox-proportional hazard model. Epidemiology and Infection, Vol. 146, Issue. 10, p. 1337.

    Yang, Yuwei You, Enqing Wu, Jinju Zhang, Wenyan Jin, Jin Zhou, Mengmeng Jiang, Chunxiao and Huang, Fen 2018. Effects of relative humidity on childhood hand, foot, and mouth disease reinfection in Hefei, China. Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 630, Issue. , p. 820.

    Shi, Chao Liu, Juan Shi, Ping Ji, Hong Shen, Yuan and Qian, Yan-Hua 2018. Epidemiological characteristics and influential factors of hand, foot, and mouth disease reinfection in Wuxi, China, 2008–2016. BMC Infectious Diseases, Vol. 18, Issue. 1,

    Zhang, Qian Zhou, Mengmeng Yang, Yuwei You, Enqing Wu, Jinju Zhang, Wenyan Jin, Jing and Huang, Fen 2019. Short-term effects of extreme meteorological factors on childhood hand, foot, and mouth disease reinfection in Hefei, China: A distributed lag non-linear analysis. Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 653, Issue. , p. 839.

    ×

Actions:

      • Send article to Kindle

        To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

        Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

        Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

        Epidemiological characteristics and influential factors of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) reinfection in children in Anhui province
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Dropbox

        To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

        Epidemiological characteristics and influential factors of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) reinfection in children in Anhui province
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Google Drive

        To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

        Epidemiological characteristics and influential factors of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) reinfection in children in Anhui province
        Available formats
        ×
Export citation

Summary

Hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute contagious condition caused by a spectrum of human enteroviruses. HFMD reinfection is common in the absence of cross-protection from other virus subtypes. This study focused on reinfection in children in Anhui province, China between 2008 and 2013 using surveillance system data. We classified 8960 cases as reinfected, corresponding to a rate of 2·02%. The reinfection rate was higher in boys than in girls [odds ratio (OR) 1·27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·21–1·32, P < 0·001], children aged < 3 years (OR 3·82, 95% CI 3·58–4·07, P < 0·001), and children living in rural areas (OR 1·09, 95% CI 1·04–1·14, P = 0·001). The reinfection rate in children who were originally infected with non-enterovirus A71 (non-EVA71) enteroviruses was higher than those infected with EVA71 (OR 1·36, 95% CI 1·02–1·80, P = 0·034). Influential factors of reinfection rate included annual incidence (β coefficient = 0·715, P = 0·002) and the proportion of EVA71 in patients with mild HFMD (β coefficient = −0·509, P = 0·018). These results demonstrate that boys aged <3 years, especially those in rural areas or regions with a lower EVA71 proportion are more prone to reinfection, and specific health education programmes should be developed to protect these susceptible populations.

INTRODUCTION

Hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is a common acute contagious disease, particularly in children aged <5 years. It is characterized by fever, ulcers or blisters in the mouth, and a rash on the hands, feet, or buttocks [1]. HFMD is typically a mild, self-limiting disorder; however, some patients may progress to develop severe complications such as aseptic meningitis, neuronal pulmonary oedema, myocarditis, or even death [24]. While HFMD is caused by a spectrum of human enteroviruses, enterovirus A71 (EVA71) and coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16) are considered to be the major pathogens [5].

There have been widespread cases of HFMD in the Asia-Pacific region in past decades, especially in East and South East Asia including Taiwan (China), Singapore, Malaysia, Japan and mainland China [68]. The first case of HFMD in mainland China was reported in Shanghai in 1981, and additional cases were gradually reported in other regions [9, 10]. However, HFMD did not receive sufficient attention until two large outbreaks caused 25 deaths in Linyi city, Shandong province and Fuyang city, Anhui province [11, 12]. Subsequently, there was a nationwide epidemic, and HFMD was classified as a category C notifiable infectious disease by the Chinese Ministry of Health on 2 May 2008. More than 100 000 HFMD cases are reported annually through the National Infectious Disease Surveillance System of China, ranking it first among the notifiable infectious disease categories. Between 2008 and 2013, there were approximately 600 severe HFMD cases and 20 deaths annually in Anhui province. As a result, HFMD has become an important public health issue.

Lacking cross-protection from different virus subtypes, HFMD reinfection is quite common [13], which increases the prevalence of HFMD and the associated public health burden. However, few studies have focused on reinfection, which hampers the development of targeted interventions. The present investigation assessed the reinfection rate in children in Anhui province, China between 2 May 2008 and 31 December 2013 in order to summarize the epidemiological characteristics and influential factors of reinfection.

METHODS

Study samples

Since 2 May 2008, HFMD has been required to be reported as a statutorily notifiable infectious disease, with laboratory-confirmed and clinically diagnosed cases to be reported within 24 h. Data on HFMD cases from 2 May 2008 to 31 December 2013, including name, sex, age, date of birth, date of onset, current address, phone number, name of parents, reporting unit, and pathogenic results, were extracted from the National Infectious Disease Surveillance System of China by date of onset and current address.

Case definition

The diagnostic criteria of HFMD were based on the 2010 HFMD Clinic Guidelines issued by the Ministry of Health of China. A clinically diagnosed case of HFMD was defined as a patient presenting with a vesicular rash over the hands, feet, mouth, or buttocks, with or without fever. A laboratory-diagnosed case of HFMD was defined as a clinically diagnosed case with laboratory evidence including enterovirus isolation, detection of enterovirus-specific RNA, or at least a fourfold increase in the antibody titres between the acute and convalescent phases or neutralizing antibody titres ⩾1:256. Patients were diagnosed as severe cases of HFMD, regardless of clinical or laboratory diagnosis, if they presented with any neurological complications (e.g. brainstem encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, acute flaccid paralysis) and/or cardiopulmonary complications (e.g. myocarditis, pulmonary oedema, shortness of breath, cardiorespiratory failure). All other patients were diagnosed with mild HFMD. A reinfected case was defined as a patient who was infected with HFMD at least twice from 2008 to 2013, and a patient who was infected with HFMD only once was identified as a non-reinfected case.

Reinfected case screening

The screening criteria for reinfected cases included (1) the same patient's name; (2) >15 days between the two infections; (3) more than one item alike among the parent's name, phone number, and current address. If only one item was alike, the information was checked with the patient s' guardians.

Reinfected HFMD cases were screened using the Microsoft Excel macro program (Microsoft, USA) that automatically copies eligible case information to a file. All data were then checked manually, and if any inaccuracy was identified, the patients' guardians would be contacted to confirm the information.

Statistics

The numbers and percentages were calculated for categorical variables, and medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) were summarized for continuous variables. The χ 2 test was applied to stratify comparisons of reinfection rate (the number of reinfected cases divided by number of probable and confirmed cases) and case-severity rate (the number of severe cases divided by number of probable and confirmed cases), and the trend χ 2 test was used to analyse the incidence trend with age. A linear regression model was used to explore the influential factors of reinfection rate in different regions. P < 0·05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS v. 11.0 (SPSS Inc., USA).

RESULTS

General patient information

A total of 444 076 paediatric cases of HFMD were reported from 2008 to 2013 in Anhui province, of which 8960 cases were reinfections. The reinfection rate was 2·02%, with 8752 cases infected twice, 200 cases three times, and eight cases four times. The annual reinfection rate increased each year (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. HFMD reinfection rate from 2008 to 2013.

Population and time distribution

The reinfection rate was higher in boys than girls [odds ratio (OR) 1·27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·21–1·32, P < 0·001]. The reinfection rate decreased with age (χ 2 = 3420·090, P < 0·001), and the reinfection rate in children aged < 3 years was higher than that of older children (OR 3·82, 95% CI 3·58–4·07, P < 0·001). Subjects aged <3 years accounted for 87·94% of reinfected cases. The reinfection rate was higher in rural areas than urban areas (OR 1·09, 95% CI 1·04–1·14, P = 0·001; Table 1). The seasonal distributions of primary and secondary infections and non-reinfection were similar, and the peaks occurred from May to July annually (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Seasonal distributions of the primary and secondary infections and non-reinfection.

Table 1. Reinfection rate according to sex, age group, and residence

CI, Confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

* Age calculated according to the primary infection.

Reinfection time interval

In cases that were infected twice, the median time interval between the infections was 11 (IQR 7–17) months, and reinfection was more likely to appear in the next epidemic season in all age groups (Fig. 3). In cases that were infected three times, the median time intervals were 9 (IQR 6–12) and 10 (IQR 5–14) months between the previous two infections and the latter two infections, respectively.

Fig. 3. Time intervals between primary and secondary infections in different age groups.

Influential factors of regional reinfection rate

A linear stepwise regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing the regional reinfection rate. It was significantly correlated with the proportion of EVA71 in laboratory-confirmed HFMD cases of mild illness (β coefficient = −0·509, P = 0·018) and the annual incidence of HFMD (β coefficient = 0·715, P = 0·002), but it was not significantly correlated with the proportion of boys or the proportion of children aged <3 years. The detailed results are listed in Table 2 and Figure 4.

Fig. 4. Distribution of the annual incidence, proportion of non-EVA71 disease, and reinfection rate from 2008 to 2013 in Anhui province, China. The annual incidence is colour coded from pale to dark brown, and the proportion of non-EVA71 disease and reinfection rate are shown according to the area and size of circular symbols.

Table 2. Regression analysis of the factors correlated with reinfection rate at the city level

Clinical classification and reinfection virus subtype

Of all the reinfected cases, 88 were classified as severe, and there were no fatal cases. Of these, 27 severe cases were identified in the second infection; however, the case-severity rate for reinfection was lower than that of non-reinfection (OR 0·55, 95% CI 0·38–0·81, P = 0·002; Table 3).

Table 3. Case-severity rates of reinfection and non-reinfection

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

There were 477 laboratory-confirmed reinfected cases. Of these, 223 cases were only tested in the primary infection, 246 in the reinfection, and eight cases in both. In the mild cases that were analysed, the reinfection rate was higher in patients infected with non-EVA71 enteroviruses (OR 1·36, 95% CI 1·02–1·80, P = 0·034; Table 4).

Table 4. Reinfection rates of different virus subtypes in mild cases

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Eight patients had both primary and secondary laboratory test results (Table 5), and two patients were infected with EVA71 in both infections. The first patient was a 1-year-old child who was infected in May 2012 and March 2013, and the second patient was a 3-year-old child infected in May and November 2013.

Table 5. Pathogenic results in subjects whose pathogens were detected in two infections

DISCUSSION

Children are susceptible to enteroviruses that can cause HFMD. The antibodies produced after natural infection can provide certain protection against the same virus subtype; however, they cannot provide cross-protection for other subtypes [13]. For this reason, HFMD reinfection is quite common. Our results show that the reinfection rate in Anhui province during 2008 to 2013 was 2·02%, and it increased every year.

Ji et al. [14] demonstrated that the seroprevalence rate of anti-EVA71 and anti-CVA16 gradually increased with age and peaked in 4-year-olds. The median time interval between reinfection was 11 months; therefore, children aged <3 years were more prone to HFMD reinfection. We found that the reinfection rate in children aged <3 years was significantly higher than that in older children, with the primary infection age of <3 years accounting for 87·94% of reinfected cases. The present results also demonstrate that the HFMD reinfection rate was higher in boys than in girls, which is in accordance with HFMD incidence outcomes [15]. A possible reason for this discrepancy is that boys are generally more mischievous and active and may therefore have more opportunities to touch objects polluted by other infected children. A difference in the consultation rate between boys and girls in rural areas may also contribute to the sex-specific difference. We observed that the reinfection rate was higher in rural areas, mainly due to the poor sanitary conditions. In summary, boys aged <3 years living in rural areas were more susceptible to HFMD reinfection. Therefore, their parents or guardians need to be alert to signs of HFMD, even if their children were previously infected. In addition, administrations need to develop specific health education programmes to inform susceptible populations of the risk reinfection. These could include videos playing in vaccination clinics, sending text messages to guardians of children aged <3 years through the vaccination system, and handing out fliers to the guardians of HFMD patients at clinics.

There was a significant difference in reinfection rates in different cities with a maximum and minimum of 3·25% and 1·09%, respectively. Both the regional annual incidence and EVA71 proportion in mild cases were associated with the regional reinfection rate. Prior to this report, lower EVA71 prevalence rates were encouraging as they predicted lower case-severity rates and lower HFMD burden [16]. However, according to our study, the lower primary infection rate of EVA71 is associated with a higher reinfection rate. Public health authorities in areas with a lower EVA71 proportion of laboratory-confirmed cases need to promote hygiene education so that children can reduce the likelihood of reinfection.

Since the 2008 HFMD outbreak, EVA71 has been shown to be predominant in Anhui province, and it reached 51·09% in mild HMFD cases. As EVA71 was more prevalent in the environment, children infected with non-EVA71 enteroviruses tended to be reinfected with HFMD. In the present study, the reinfection rate in subjects infected with EVA71 was 1·80%, which was lower than that in those infected with non-EVA71 enteroviruses (2·43%). The case-severity rate in reinfection was also lower than that in non-reinfection. A similar phenomenon was reported for H1N1 influenza reinfection [17], and it was hypothesized that these patients had suboptimal immune protection from the primary natural infection.

HFMD has a high silent infection rate and multiple transmission routes, both of which contribute to the relatively poor effectiveness of public health interventions, and vaccine development is a priority. In mainland China, three EVA71 vaccines have gone through phase 3 clinical trials, with a vaccine efficacy >90% [1820]. However, there were some discrepant results throughout the trials. Chen et al. [21] reported that two HFMD patients were infected with EVA71 twice, and the time intervals were 7 and 15 months. In the present study, there were also two patients infected with EVA71 virus twice, and the time intervals were 5 and 10 months. There are several reasons that may explain this phenomenon. First, more than two genogroups of EVA71 viruses can occur simultaneously in an epidemic. Huang et al. [22] demonstrated that children infected with genogroup B or C EVA71 virus were not cross-protected against genogroup A, and genogroups A and C EVA71 viruses were found throughout China [23, 24]. Therefore, patients can be infected with different EVA71 virus genogroups. Second, individual immune system differences can cause reinfection such as host immunological defects or host sub-optimal immune responses in the primary infection. It is therefore necessary to conduct pathogen tests on reinfected cases to determine the EVA71 reinfection rate, which will provide essential data to guide EVA71 vaccine development.

The present study has several limitations. First, only 5–10% of cases were confirmed with laboratory tests, therefore very few reinfected cases had laboratory results for both infections. Second, the samples of two patients infected with the EVA71 virus in both infections could not be collected for sequence analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that the HMFD reinfection rate in Anhui province was 2·02% from 2008 to 2013. The reinfection-susceptible population comprised children living in rural areas who were aged <3 years, particularly boys, and children who had been primarily infected with non-EVA71 enteroviruses. A higher incidence and lower EVA71 proportion of laboratory-confirmed cases were positively associated with regional reinfection. It is vital that administrations develop specific health education policies to inform susceptible populations and reduce the reinfection rate.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank the hospitals, local health departments, and the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention in Anhui province for data collection assistance.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

REFERENCES

1. Tseng, FC, et al. Epidemiological survey of enterovirus infections occurring in Taiwan between 2000 and 2005: analysis of sentinel physician surveillance data. Journal of Medical Virology 2007; 79: 18501860.
2. Huang, CC, et al. Neurologic complications in children with enterovirus 71 infection. New England Journal of Medicine 1999; 341: 936942.
3. Ooi, MH, et al. Clinical features, diagnosis, and management of enterovirus 71. Lancet Neurology 2010; 9: 10971105.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Deaths among children during an outbreak of hand, foot, and mouth disease – Taiwan, Republic of China, April-July 1998. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 1998; 47: 629632.
5. Liu, W, et al. Co-circulation and genomic recombination of coxsackievirus A16 and enterovirus 71 during a large outbreak of hand, foot, and mouth disease in Central China. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e96051.
6. Ho, M, et al. An epidemic of enterovirus 71 infection in Taiwan. Taiwan Enterovirus Epidemic Working Group. New England Journal of Medicine 1999; 341: 929935.
7. Ang, LW, et al. Epidemiology and control of hand, foot and mouth disease in Singapore, 2001–2007. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2009; 38: 106112.
8. Chan, LG, et al. Deaths of children during an outbreak of hand, foot, and mouth disease in sarawak, malaysia: clinical and pathological characteristics of the disease. For the Outbreak Study Group. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2000; 31: 678683.
9. Zhang, Y, et al. An outbreak of hand, foot, and mouth disease associated with subgenotype C4 of human enterovirus 71 in Shandong, China. Journal of Clinical Virology 2009; 44: 262267.
10. Li, L, et al. Genetic characteristics of human enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16 circulating from 1999 to 2004 in Shenzhen, People's Republic of China. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2005; 43: 38353839.
11. Zhang, Y, et al. An outbreak of hand, foot, and mouth disease associated with subgenotype C4 of human enterovirus 71 in Shandong, China. Journal of Clinical Virology 2009; 44: 262267.
12. Zhang, Y, et al. An emerging recombinant human enterovirus 71 responsible for the 2008 outbreak of hand foot and mouth disease in Fuyang city of China. Journal of Virology 2010; 7: 94.
13. Huang, WC, et al. Seroprevalence of enterovirus 71 and no evidence of crossprotection of enterovirus 71 antibody against the other enteroviruses in kindergarten children in Taipei city. Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection 2012; 45: 96101.
14. Ji, H, et al. Seroepidemiology of human enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16 in Jiangsu province, China. Journal of Virology 2012; 9: 248.
15. Zeng, M, et al. Epidemiology of hand, foot, and mouth disease in children in Shanghai 2007–2010. Epidemiology and Infection 2012; 140: 11221130.
16. Gao, LD, et al. Correlation analysis of EV71 detection and case severity in hand, foot, and mouth disease in the Hunan Province of China. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e100003.
17. Trakulsrichai, S, Watcharananan, SP, Chantratita, W. Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 reinfection in Thailand. Journal of Infection Public Health 2012; 5: 211214.
18. Li, R, et al. An inactivated enterovirus 71 vaccine in healthy children. New England Journal of Medicine 2014; 370: 829837.
19. Zhu, F, et al. Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of an enterovirus 71 vaccine in China. New England Journal of Medicine 2014; 370: 818828.
20. Zhu, FC, et al. Efficacy, safety, and immunology of an inactivated alum-adjuvant enterovirus 71 vaccine in children in China: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2014; 381: 20242032.
21. Chen, C, et al. Analysis of repeated infection in hand foot mouth disease cases in Guangzhou from 2008 to 2011. China Tropical Medicine 2012; 14: 934936.
22. Huang, ML, et al. Cross-reactive neutralizing antibody responses to enterovirus 71 infections in young children: implications for vaccine development. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2013; 7: e2067.
23. Wong, SS, et al. Human enterovirus 71 and hand, foot and mouth disease. Epidemiology and Infection 2010; 138: 10741089.
24. Yu, H, et al. Genetic analysis of the VP1 region of enterovirus 71 reveals the emergence of genotype A in central China in 2008. Virus Genes 2010; 41: 14.