Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:14:26.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of an intramammary infusion of endotoxin on the establishment of experimental mastitis by Streptococcus agalactiae inthe cow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. Brownlie
J. Brownlie
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council, Institute for Research on Animal Diseases, Compton, Newbury, Berks.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An infusion of E. coli endotoxin (10 μg) into the mammary gland of the cow 16 h before experimental infection with St. agalactiae prevented the establishment of mastitis. A clinical examination of the affected gland did not reveal signs of inflammation, all organisms were eliminated from the milk by 36 h after infection. Mammary glands not pretreated with endotoxin, and injected with the same number of viable streptococci, showed signs of severe inflammation, the milk yield was reduced and the injected pathogen could be isolated from the gland for up to 14 days when sampling was discontinued. The injection of endotoxin alone produced a rapid increase in the cell count of the milk, there were some signs of inflammation and 80% of the cells in the milk were neutrophils. The cell counts in the milk remained above normal for 7–10 days. Untreated control quarters appeared to be unaffected by the injection of E. coli endotoxin into an adjacent quarter, on the other hand the injection of St. agalactiae into the adjacent quarter on the same side of the udder produced a cell response which reached a peak after 2 days and returned to preinoculation levels by the fourth day. No inflammation was observed in these control quarters and no streptococci were isolated from the milk.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 83 , Issue 1 , August 1979 , pp. 103 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

References

Broadhurst, J. & Paley, C. (1939). A single-dip stain for the direct examination of milk. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 94, 525–6.Google Scholar
Brownlie, J. (1971). Antimicrobial proteins in bovine neutrophils. Biochemical Journal 125, 81–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El hagri, M. A. A. M. (1945). Study of the arterial and lymphatic systems in the udder of the cow. Veterinary Journal 101, 7–33, 51–63.Google Scholar
Hibbitt, K. G. & Hill, A. W. (1977). Non-specific resistance to infection in relation to mastitis. In Antibodies and Antibiosis in Agriculture(ed. M. Woodbine), p. 245. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mergenhagen, S. B., Synderman, R., Gewurz, H. & Shin, H. S. (1969). Significance of complement to the mechanism of action of endotoxin. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 47, 37–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, A. A., Misra, S. S. & Irwin, J. O. (1938). The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. Journal of Hygiene 38, 732–49.Google ScholarPubMed
Neter, E. (1969). Endotoxin and the immune response. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 47, 82–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peavy, D. L., Adler, W. H. & Smith, R. T. (1970). The mitogenic effects of endotoxin and staphylococcal enterotoxin B on mouse spleen cells and human peripheral lymphocytes. Immunology 105, 1453–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Russell, M. W., Brooker, B. E. & Reiter, B. (1976). Inhibition of the bactericidal activity of bovine polymorphonuclear leucocytes and related systems by casein. Research in Veterinary Science 20, 30–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowley, D. (1955). Stimulation of natural immunity to Escherichia coli infections. Observations in mice. Lancet i, 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalm, O. W., Lasmanis, J. & Carroll, E. J. (1966). Significance of leucocyte infiltration into the milk in experimental Streptococcus agalactiae mastitis in cattle. American Journal of Veterinary Research 27, 1537–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Schalm, O. W., Lasmanis, J. & Carroll, E. J. (1967). Experimental Streptococcus agalactiae mastitis in cattle: Attempts to superimpose the organism in lactating glands harboring unrelated bacterial infections and in glands with experimentally induced sterile inflammation. American Journal of Veterinary Research 28, 685–695.Google ScholarPubMed
Schalm, O. W. & Ziv-silberman, G. (1968). Reactions following intramammary infusions of E. coli endotoxin. Veterinary Record 82, 100–103.Google Scholar
Sisson, S. & Grossman, J. D. (1938). The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar