1.Ohkusa, Y, et al. An experimental fully automatic syndromic surveillance in Japan. Advances in Disease Surveillance 2007; 4: 59.
2.Doroshenko, A, et al. Evaluation of syndromic surveillance based on National Health Service Direct derived data – England and Wales. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports 2005; 54 (Suppl.): 117–122.
3.Lazarus, R, et al. Use of automated ambulatory-care encounter records for detection of acute illness clusters, including potential bioterrorism events. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2002; 8: 753–760.
4.Wu, TS, et al. Establishing a nationwide emergency department-based syndromic surveillance system for better public health responses in Taiwan. BMC Public Health 2008; 8: 18.
5.Greenko, J, et al. Clinical evaluation of the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) ambulance dispatch-based syndromic surveillance system, New York City. Journal of Urban Health 2003; 80 (2 Suppl. 1): i50–56.
6.Dembek, ZF, et al. Hospital admissions syndromic surveillance – Connecticut, September 2001–November 2003. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports 2004; 53 (Suppl.): 50–52.
7.Lober, WB, et al. Syndromic surveillance using automated collection of computerized discharge diagnoses. Journal of Urban Health 2003; 80 (2 Suppl. 1): i97–106.
8.Osaka, K, Takahashi, H, Ohyama, T. Testing a symptom-based surveillance system at high-profile gatherings as a preparatory measure for bioterrorism. Epidemiology and Infection 2002; 129: 429–434.
9.Ohkusa, Y, et al. Experimental surveillance using data on sales of over-the-counter medications – Japan, November 2003–April 2004. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports 2005; 54 (Suppl.): 47–52.
10.Besculides, M, et al. Evaluation of school absenteeism data for early outbreak detection, New York City. BMC Public Health 2005; 5: 105.
11.Henning, KJ. What is syndromic surveillance? Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports 2004; 53 (Suppl.): 5–11.
12.Sugawara, T, et al. Full automatic syndromic surveillance system using prescription in Japan. Advances in Disease Surveillance 2008; 5: 192.
13.CDC. Update: Investigation of anthrax associated with intentional exposure and interim public health guidelines, October 2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports 2001; 50: 889–893.
14.Heffernan, R, et al. New York City syndromic surveillance systems. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports 2004; 53 (Suppl.): 23–27.
15.Suzuki, S, et al. WDQH-based Japanese syndromic surveillance for FIFA World Cup 2002. Journal of Urban Health 2003; 80 (Suppl. 1): i123.
16.Buehler, JW, et al. Framework for evaluating public health surveillance systems for early detection of outbreaks: recommendations from the CDC Working Group. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports (Recommended Reports) 2004; 53: 1–11.
17.Lombardo, JS, Burkom, H, Pavlin, J. ESSENCE II and the framework for evaluating syndromic surveillance systems. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports 2004; 53 (Suppl.): 159–165.
18.Meyer, N, et al. A multi-data source surveillance system to detect a bioterrorism attack during the G8 Summit meeting in Scotland. Epidemiology and Infection 2008; 136: 876–885.
19.de Jong, B, Ancker, C. Web-based questionnaires – a tool used in a Campylobacter outbreak investigation in Stockholm, Sweden, October 2007. Eurosurveillance 2008; 13(17).
20.Hutwagner, LTW, Seeman, GM, Treadwell, T. The bioterrorism preparedness and response Early Aberration Reporting System (EARS). Journal of Urban Health 2003; 80: 89–96.
21.Sugawara, T, et al. Development of automatic syndromic surveillance for infectious diseases using electronic medical record. Japan Journal of Medical Informatics 2009; 28: 13–20.
22.Ohkusa, Y, et al. Symptoms of outpatients as data for syndromic surveillance. Kansenshogaku Zasshi 2006; 80: 366–376
23.Hutwagner, LC, et al. A simulation model for assessing aberration detection methods used in public health surveillance for systems with limited baselines. Statistics in Medicine 2005; 24: 543–550.
24.Najmi, AH, Magruder, SF. An adaptive prediction and detection algorithm for multistream syndromic surveillance. BMC Medical Informatics Decision Making 2005; 5: 33.