Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T11:55:30.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The comparative susceptibility of hysterectomy-produced, colostrum-deprived pigs and naturally born, enzootic-pneumonia-free pigs to enzootic pneumonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. F. W. Goodwin  and
P. Whittlestone
R. F. W. Goodwin
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge
P. Whittlestone
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Hysterectomy-produced, colostrum-deprived (HPCD) pigs and naturally born, enzootic-pneumonia-free (EPF) pigs were compared with respect to their susceptibility to two strains of enzootic pneumonia induced by intranasal inoculation of suspensions of ground pneumonic tissue. All but one of the HPCD pigs developed enzootic pneumonia, whereas the EPF pigs commonly failed to develop the disease; secondly, the pneumonic lesions were more extensive in the HPCD pigs.

When the dose of inoculum was increased in EPF pigs, the resulting pneumonic areas were larger.

In a small, in-contact experiment the disease was also more readily transmitted to HPCD pigs than to EPF pigs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 69 , Issue 3 , September 1971 , pp. 391 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

References

REFERENCES

Betts, A. O., Lamont, P. H. & Littlewort, M. C. G. (1960). The production by hysterectomy of pathogen-free, colostrum-deprived pigs and the foundation of a minimal-disease herd. Veterinary Record 72, 461.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R. F. W., Hodgson, R. G., Whittlestone, P. & Woodhams, R. L. (1969 a). Immunity in experimentally induced enzootic pneumonia of pigs. Journal of Hygiene 67, 193.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R. F. W., Hodgson, R. G., Whittlestone, P. & Woodhams, R. L. (1969 b). Some experiments relating to artificial immunity in enzootic pneumonia of pigs. Journal of Hygiene 67, 465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, R. F. W., Pomeroy, A. P. & Whittlestone, P. (1965). Production of enzootic pneumonia in pigs with a mycoplasma. Veterinary Record 77, 1247.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R. F. W., Pomeroy, A. P. & Whittlestone, P. (1967). Characterization of Mycoplasma suipneumoniae: a mycoplasma causing enzootic pneumonia of pigs. Journal of Hygiene 65, 85.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R. F. W., Pomeroy, A. P. & Whittlestone, P. (1968). Attempts to recover Mycoplasma suipneumoniae from experimental and natural cases of enzootic pneumonia in pigs. Journal of Hygiene 66, 595.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, R. F. W. & Whittlestone, P. (1963). Production of enzootic pneumonia in pigs with an agent grown in tissue culture from the natural disease. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 44, 291.Google Scholar
Whittlestone, P. (1967). Mycoplasma in enzootic pneumonia of pigs. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 143 (art. 1), 271.Google Scholar