Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T16:59:31.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bacteriological quality of potable water sources supplying Morogoro municipality and its outskirts: a case study in Tanzania.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

S. F. H. Jiwa ,
J. K. Mugula  and
M. J. Msangi
S. F. H. Jiwa
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Parasitology
J. K. Mugula
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Technology, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3086, Morogoro, Tanzania
M. J. Msangi
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Technology, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3086, Morogoro, Tanzania
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Bacteriological quality of potable water supplying Morogoro municipality and its outskirts (population 135000 people) was assessed by the determination of the most probable number (MPN) of faecal coliforms, Escherichia coli, faecal streptococci and Clostridium perfringens for a period of 6 months. River water and chlorinated pipeborne water were found contaminated with microorganisms in the order of 3·8 x 101 to 4·95 x 103; 3·2 x 101 to 4·5 x 103; 101 to 6·4 x 101 and 1·2 x 101 to 2·5 x 102/100 ml of water respectively. Injured coliforms in treated water averaged 87 %. Pollution of river water by organic matter was much above acceptable standard. These findings indicate that there is a need for further treatment of water before consumption in order to avoid potential health hazards.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 107 , Issue 3 , December 1991 , pp. 479 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

References

REFERENCES

1.Alabi, DA, Adesiyum, AA.Studies on microbial quality of filtered water in households of a university community in Nigeria J Hyg 1982; 89: 69–78.Google Scholar
2.Evinson, LM.James, A.A comparison of the distribution of intestinal bacteria in British and East African, water sources. J Appl Bacteriol 1973; 36: 109–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Laila, EA, Aleya, AG, Amal, EMK, Olfat, ES.The sanitary contamination of drinking water in a Nile delta village: II. Bacterial contamination of drinking water in a Nile delta village. J Hyg 1982; 88: 63–7.Google Scholar
4.Srindhar, MKC, Oluwande, PA, Akubadejo, AO.Health hazards and pollution from open drains in a Nigerian city. Ambio 1981; 10: 29–33.Google Scholar
5.WHO. Community water supply and sewage disposal in developing countries. World Health Statistic Report 1973; 26: 720–83.Google Scholar
6.WHO. Guidelines for drinking water quality. Geneva: World Health Organization. 1983.Google Scholar
7.Wright, RC.A comparison of the levels of faecal indicator bacteria in water and human faeces in a rural area of a tropical developing country (Sierra Leone). J Hyg 1982: 89: 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Wright, RC.The seasonality of bacterial quality of water in a tropical developing country (Sierra Leone) J Hyg 1986; 96: 75–82.Google Scholar
9.Barrell, RAE, Rowland, MGM. Infant food as potential source of diarrhoeal illness in rural West Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1979; 73: 85–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.UNICEF. Hali ya watoto Tanzania. Dar es Salaam; Mkuki na Nyota Publishers. 1986.Google Scholar
11.Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre. Data report on food and nutrition 1974/75–1979/80.Dar es Salaam, 1980.Google Scholar
12.Anon. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. 15th ed.Washington: American public Health Association, 1976.Google Scholar
13.McFeters, GA.Le Chavallier, MW, Cameron, SC.Influence of diluents, media and membrane filters on detection of injured waterborne coliform bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982; 43: 97–103.Google Scholar
14.Thatcher, FS, Clark, DS. Microorganisms in foods; their significance and methods of enumeration. Recommendations of the International Committee on Microbiological Specifications for Foods. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1968.Google Scholar
15.Speck, ML (ed.). Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. Washington: American Public Health Association. 1976.Google Scholar
16.Harrigan, WF, McCance, ME.Laboratory methods in food and dairy microbiology. London: Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar
17.Hamad, ZH.Dirar, H.Microbiological examination of seebel water. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982; 43: 1238–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis. 12th ed.Washington: Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 1975.Google Scholar
19.Henry, JF.Huttly, SRA.Patway, Y.Aziz, KMA. Environmental sanitation, food and water contamination and diarrhoea in rural Bangladesh. Epidemiol Infect 1990: 104: 253–9.Google Scholar
20.Sandiford, P, Gorter, AC.Davey-Smith, G.Pauw, JPC.Determinants of drinking water quality in rural Nicaragua. Epidemiol Infect 1989; 102: 429–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Feachem, RG.Faecal coliforms and faecal streptococci in streams in the New Guinea highlands. Water Research 1974: 8: 367–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Holden, WS.Water treatment and examination. London: Churchill. 1970.Google Scholar
23.Clark, JA, Vlassoff, LT.Relationship among pollution indicator bacteria isolated from rawwater and distribution systems by the presence-absence (P-A) test. Health Lab Sci 1973: 10: 163–72.Google Scholar
24.Jerome, LM.Comparative analysis of modelling techniques for coliform organisms in streams. Appl Microbiol 1973: 27: 340–5.Google Scholar
25.WHO. Guidelines of drinking water quality. Vol. 3. Drinking water quality control in small community supplies. Geneva: World Health Organization. 1985.Google Scholar